Experimental setup using microwave heating
Tests under microwave conditions were performed in commer-
cial microwave equipment (Discover series, BenchMate model,
CEM Corporation, USA) with a capacity of 4 ml. It was
equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a fibre-optic sensor
to monitor the temperature, which was set by varying the
microwave power. For the esterification reactions of LA, 10 W
◦
energy was used to hold the reaction temperature on 40 C. The
volume and the composition of the reaction mixture was the
same as under conventional conditions.
Fig. 4 Composition of the unreacted compounds in the reaction mix-
ture during reaction under microwave conditions (reaction conditions:
see Fig. 2).
Analytical methods
Water content of the substrates and the reaction mixture
was measured by a Mettler Toledo DL31 type Karl Fisher
titrator. The product samples were analysed by a HP 5890A
gas chromatograph with a HP-FFAP column and FID detector.
The HPLC analyses were carried out on MERC type equipment
with a Zorbax SB-Aq 76 column and L-7450 detector. The
monitoring wavelength was 215 nm. All reactions were carried
out in triplicate and the average error was less than 6%.
Conclusions
The enzymatic synthesis of ethyl lactate was successfully
achieved in Cyphos 104 and Cyphos 202 ILs. These media
have also been applied to extract LA from the fermentation
broth, thus the same media can be used for both extraction and
4
reaction. Further improvement of the esterification reaction
is possible using microwave heating instead of conventional
conditions. According to our results, microwave irradiation
enhanced the ethyl lactate production accelerating the hydrolysis
of lactoyllactic acid. Based on our findings, combining the
advantage of microwave treatment with the esterification in
the extracting agent as co-solvent can result in a reaction with
enhanced yields and higher rate.
Acknowledgements
This work was partly supported by the Hungarian–Slovak Sci-
ence and Technology Cooperation (Project No. SK-03/2006).
Notes and references
1
2
3
R. Datta and M. Henry, J. Chem. Technol. Biot., 2006, 81, 1119–1129.
S. Aparicio and R. Alcalde, Green Chem., 2009, 11, 65–78.
H. G. Joglekar, I. Rahman, S. Babu, B. D. Kulkarni and A. Joshi,
Sep. Purif. Technol., 2006, 52, 1–17.
Experimental
ˇ
4
5
J. Mart a´ k and S. Schlosser, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2007, 57, 438–494.
Materials
E. Feh e´ r, V. Illeova, I. Kelemen-Horv a´ th, K. B e´ lafi-Bak o´ , M.
Polakovic and L. Gubicza, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2008, 50, 28–32.
S. Cantone, U. Hanefeld and A. Basso, Green Chem., 2007, 9, 945–
971.
ꢀ
R
Immobilized CALB (Novozym 435 ) was received from
Novozymes (Bagsvaerd, Denmark) as a gift. Cyphos 104 (purity
6
>
95 w/w%) and 202 ILs were purchased from IoLiTec GmbH,
7 D. Bogdal, Microwave-assisted Organic synthesis: One Hundred
Reaction Procedures, Elsevier Sciences, 2005.
Germany. Ethanol (absolute) and lactic acid (90 w/w% solution)
were purchased from Spektrum 3D, Hungary. All the organic
solvents of analytical grade were received from Scharlau,
Spain.
8
W. Qi, M. Watanabe, T. M. Aida and R. L. Smidt, Jr., Green Chem.,
008, 10, 799–805.
2
9 D. Yu, Z. Wang, P. Chen, L. Jin, Y. Cheng, J. Zhou and S. Cao,
J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2007, 48, 51–57.
0 B. R e´ jasse, S. Lamare, M.-D. Legoy and T. Besson, Org. Biomol.
Chem., 2004, 2, 1086–1089.
1 B. R e´ jasse, T. Besson, M.-D. Legoy and S. Lamare, Org. Biomol.
Chem., 2006, 4, 3703–3707.
2 K. Lundell, T. Kurki, M. Lindroos and L. T. Kanerva, Adv. Synth.
Catal., 2005, 347, 1110–1118.
1
1
1
The exact composition of the LA solution (53 w/w% LA,
26 w/w% lactoyllactic acid, 7 w/w% lactide and 14 w/w%
water) was determined by acid–base titration and Karl Fisher
titrator.
1
1
3 S. Parida and J. S. Dordick, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 2253–2259.
4 S. Hasegawa, M. Azuma and K. Takahashi, Enzyme Microb.
Technol., 2008, 43, 309–316.
Experimental setup using conventional heating
The reactions using conventional heating were carried out in a
1
1
1
1
1
5 K. R. Seddon, A. Stark and M. J. Torres, Pure Appl. Chem., 2000,
◦
GFL 3031 shaking incubator on 40 C, at 150 rpm.
72, 2275–2287.
6 M. D. Romero, L. Calvo, C. Alba, A. Daneshfar and H. S.
Ghaziaskar, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 2005, 37, 42–48.
7 W. Huang, Y.-M. Xia, H. Gao, Y.-J. Fang, Y. Wang and Y. Fang,
J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2005, 35, 113–116.
In a typical experiment a solution of the substrates consisting
of 340 mg LA solution (containing 2 mmol LA), 14 mmol
ethanol, 0.77 mmol IL and 25 mg enzyme were prepared and
reacted. 50 mL samples were taken and extracted by 4 ¥ 80 mL
hexane before GC analysis. As a preparation for HPLC analysis
the samples were diluted in 5 ml phosphate buffer (pH: 2.3, 6%
acetonitrile content).
8 L. Gubicza, N. Nemest o´ thy, T. Fr a´ ter and K. B e´ lafi-Bak o´ , Green
Chem., 2003, 5, 236–239.
9 L. Gubicza, K. B e´ lafi-Bak o´ , E. Feh e´ r and T. Fr a´ ter, Green Chem.,
2
008, 10, 1284–1287.
20 A. Engin, H. Haluk and K. Gurkan, Green Chem., 2003, 5, 460–466.
6
16 | Green Chem., 2009, 11, 614–616
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009