J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 114, No. 15, 15 April 2001
Raman investigation of ClNO
6639
and Fourier transformation to obtain Raman scattering
amplitudes15–17,57 provides for comparison with the observed
patterns of intensity.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Grateful acknowledgment is made to the National Sci-
ence Foundation and the Robert A. Welch Foundation for
support of this work.
1 C. F. Goodeve and S. Katz, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 172, 432 ͑1939͒.
2 N. M. Ballash and D. A. Armstrong, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 30, 941
͑1974͒.
3 G. S. Tyndall, K. M. Stedman, W. Schneider, J. P. Burrows, and G. K.
Moortgat, J. Photochem. 36, 133 ͑1987͒.
4 B.-M. Haas, P. Felder, and J. R. Huber, Chem. Phys. Lett. 180, 293
͑1991͒.
5 P. Felder and G. P. Morley, Chem. Phys. 185, 145 ͑1994͒.
6 V. Skorokhodov, Y. Sato, K. Suto, Y. Matsumi, and M. Kawasaki, J.
Phys. Chem. 100, 12321 ͑1996͒.
7 D. Solgadi, F. Lahmani, C. Lardeux, and J. P. Flament, Chem. Phys. 79,
225 ͑1983͒.
8 Y. Y. Bai, A. Ogai, C. X. W. Qian, L. Iwata, G. A. Segal, and H. Reisler,
J. Chem. Phys. 90, 3903 ͑1989͒.
9 L. Werner, B. Wunderer, and H. Walther, Chem. Phys. 60, 109 ͑1981͒.
10 M. D. Moser, E. Weitz, and G. C. Schatz, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 757 ͑1983͒.
11 I. T. F. Gillan, D. J. Denvir, H. F. J. Cormican, I. Duncan, and T. Morrow,
Chem. Phys. 167, 193 ͑1992͒.
12 H. L. Kim, Y. Mo, Y. Matsumi, and M. Kawasaki, Bull. Korean Chem.
Soc. 13, 162 ͑1992͒.
13 D. L. Phillips and A. B. Myers, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 226 ͑1991͒.
14 G. E. Galica, B. R. Johnson, M. O. Hale, and J. L. Kinsey, J. Phys. Chem.
95, 7994 ͑1991͒.
FIG. 7. Comparing the normal modes of McDonald et al., with the Jacobi
coordinates found in this study. ͑a͒ and ͑b͒ are the N–O stretches in each
coordinate system and are virtually identical. ͑c͒ is McDonald’s Cl–N–O
bend. ͑d͒ is the Jacobi bend. ͑e͒ is McDonald’s N–Cl stretch, while ͑f͒ is the
Jacobi Cl–͑NO͒ stretch. In ͑a͒ through ͑d͒ the chlorine atom appears to be
stationary because to make its motion visible would make the other motion
arrows extend beyond the figure’s border.
15 E. J. Heller, Acc. Chem. Res. 14, 368 ͑1981͒.
16 E. J. Heller, in Potential Energy Surfaces and Dynamics Calculations,
edited by D. G. Truhlar ͑Plenum, New York, 1981͒.
17 E. J. Heller, R. L. Sundberg, and D. Tannor, J. Phys. Chem. 86, 1822
͑1982͒.
18 B. R. Johnson, C. Kittrell, P. B. Kelly, and J. L. Kinsey, J. Phys. Chem.
100, 7743 ͑1996͒.
19 A. J. Bell and J. G. Frey, Mol. Phys. 69, 943 ͑1990͒.
20 D. A. Baugh ͑private communication͒.
interference effects are evident in the CINO results. While
absence of interferences does not conclusively rule out par-
ticipation of more than one excited electronic state in the
absorption, it weighs in on that side of the issue, at least
insofaras the absorption and early dynamical evolution is
concerned. On the basis of this evidence, therefore, we prefer
a picture in which the initial excitation for these wavelengths
is predominantly to a single excited electronic state, Bai’s
21 Houston Valve Company, Corrosion Charts, 1996.
22 H. Okabe, Photochemistry of Small Molecules ͑Wiley, New York, 1978͒.
23 C. M. Beeson and D. M. Yost, J. Chem. Phys. 7, 44 ͑1939͒.
24 P. Botschwina, H. Haertner, and W. Sawodny, Chem. Phys. Lett. 74, 156
͑1980͒.
25 W. G. Burns and H. J. Bernstein, J. Chem. Phys. 18, 1669 ͑1950͒.
26 J. R. Durig and R. C. Lord, Spectrochim. Acta 19, 421 ͑1963͒.
27 W. H. Eberhardt and T. G. Burke, J. Chem. Phys. 20, 529 ͑1952͒.
28 M. Feuerhahn, W. Hilbig, R. Minkwitz, and U. Engelhardt, Spectrochim.
Acta, Part A 34, 1065 ͑1978͒.
S (4 1A ). In order to account for the observed bimodal dis-
Ј
5
29 I. C. Hisatsune and P. Miller, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 38, 49 ͑1963͒.
30 L. H. Jones, R. R. Ryan, and L. B. Asprey, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 581 ͑1968͒.
31 L. H. Jones and B. I. Swanson, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 86 ͑1991͒.
32 L. Landau and W. H. Fletcher, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 4, 276 ͑1960͒.
33 J. K. McDonald, J. A. Merritt, V. F. Kalasinsky, H. L. Heusel, and J. R.
Durig, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 117, 69 ͑1986͒.
tribution in ET and the different  parameters for the two
components, one would then have to postulate either bifur-
cation of the evolving wave packet into two pieces on that
surface or nonadiabatic transfer of part of the amplitude to
another electronic PES. In either case, the difference in 
parameters could only be understood if the two channels
involved significant differences in the amount of molecular
rotation ͑of the triatomic entity͒ during the course of the
dissociation.
We are in the process of constructing a code for time-
dependent propagation in curvilinear coordinates using
wavelets.56 This will be used to model the observed Raman
spectra, determining the minimum number of PES’s re-
34 A. M. Mirri and E. Mazzariol, Spectrochim. Acta 22, 785 ͑1966͒.
35 A. G. Pulford and A. Walsh, Trans. Faraday Soc. 47, 347 ͑1951͒.
36 J. H. Wise and J. T. Elmer, J. Chem. Phys. 18, 1411 ͑1950͒.
37 J. E. Stewart, Infrared Spectroscopy ͑Marcel Decker, New York, 1970͒.
38 G. L. Bendazzoli, G. Cazzoli, C. D. Esposti, G. Fano, F. Ortolani, and P.
Palmieri, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 5351 ͑1986͒.
39 G. Cazzoli, C. Degli Esposti, D. Dmiani, and A. M. Mirri, Chem. Phys.
Lett. 80, 365 ͑1981͒.
40 G. Cazzoli, C. Degli Esposti, P. Palmierii, and S. Simeone, J. Mol. Spec-
trosc. 97, 165 ͑1983͒.
41 B. Gatehouse, H. S. P. Muller, N. Heineking, and M. C. L. Gerry, J.
Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 91, 3347 ͑1995͒.
¨
quired. Solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation
202.28.191.34 On: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:06:31