7472
C. J. Nichols, N. S. Simpkins / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 7469–7473
N. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 2001, 80, 1; For more recent
9. Yadav, J. S.; Madhuri, C.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Reddy, G. S.
K. K.; Sabitha, G. Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 2771.
10. Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004.
11. (a) Carpintero, M.; Jaramillo, C.; Fernandez-Mayoralas,
A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 1285; (b) See also Gourlain,
T.; Wadouachi, A.; Beaupere, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 659.
12. The regiochemistry observed in the series of examples
described in Ref. 11b suggests to us that an a-lithiation-
carbenoid C–H insertion mechanism might operate, as
established for a somewhat analogous reaction involving
epoxides (see Ref. 17).
13. For asymmetric reactions using chiral alkoxides, see, for
example, (a) Jones, C. D.; Simpkins, N. S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 1023; (b) Amadji, M.; Vadecard, J.;
Plaquevent, J. C.; Duhamel, L.; Duhamel, P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12483.
contributions, and leading references to biological areas,
see: (c) Faul, M. M.; Engler, T. A.; Sullivan, K. A.;
Grutsch, J. L.; Clayton, M. T.; Martinelli, M. J.; Pawlak,
J. M.; LeTourneau, M.; Coffey, D. S.; Pederson, S. W.;
Kolis, S. P.; Furness, K.; Malhotra, S.; Al-awar, R. S.;
Ray, J. E. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2967; (d) Zhu, G.;
Conner, S. E.; Zhou, X.; Chan, H.-K.; Shih, C.; Engler, T. A.;
Al-awar, R. S.; Brooks, H. B.; Watkins, S. A.; Spencer,
C. D.; Schultz, R. M.; Dempsey, J. A.; Considine, E. L.;
Patel, B. R.; Ogg, C. A.; Vasudevan, V.; Lytle, M. L.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 3057; (e) Zhang, L.;
Carroll, P.; Meggers, E. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 521; (f)
Messaoudi, S.; Anizon, F.; Pfeiffer, B.; Golsteyn, R.;
Prudhomme, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 4643.
3. In the form of their imide N–H derivatives many of these
systems display nanomolar inhibition of enzymes such as
protein kinase C (PKC).
4. This dihydroxylation appears in a patent, see: Roder, H.;
Lowinger, T. B.; Brittelli, D. R.; VanZandt, M. C. U.S.
Patent 6,013,646, Jan. 11, 2000.
14. For a review of chiral lithium amide base chemistry, see:
(a) OÕBrien, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 1439;
For a special journal edition dedicated to chiral lithium
amide base chemistry, see: (b) OÕBrien, P. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 4567–4733; Symposium in print guest editor. For
our most recent chiral lithium amide chemistry, see: (c)
Bennett, J. D.; Pickering, P. L.; Simpkins, N. S. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 1392.
5. For an excellent review of cyclic sulfate chemistry, see: (a)
Byun, H.-S.; He, L.; Bittman, R. Tetrahedron 2000, 56,
7051; For the seminal contribution, see: (b) Gao, Y.;
Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7538.
6. The use of NaH as base seems more usual, but was
ineffective in our system, see, for examples, (a) Tewson, T.
J.; Soderlind, M. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1985, 4, 529; (b)
Hanessian, S.; Vatele, J.-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22,
3579.
15. A mixture of chiral lithium amide 14 and LiCl was
prepared by treatment of a solution of the appropriate
secondary amine–HCl salt (88.0mg, 0.34mmol) in THF
(1mL) at ꢀ78ꢁC under N2 with nBuLi (1.27M in hexanes,
0.52, 0.66mL). The mixture was allowed to warm to room
temperature for 0.5h before being recooled to ꢀ78ꢁC and
then a solution of cyclic sulfate 6 (50.0mg, 0.08mmol) in
THF (15mL) pre-cooled to ꢀ78ꢁC was added dropwise.
After 4h the reaction mixture was quenched with H2O
(1mL) and 20% H2SO4 (3.3mL) added. The reaction
mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature with
stirring for 18h and was then partitioned between EtOAc
(75mL) and H2O (75mL). The organic layer was washed
with H2O (75mL), saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution
(75mL), brine (75mL), dried (MgSO4), and concentrated
in vacuo to give a yellow solid, which was purified by flash
column chromatography using a 2–10% MeOH–CH2Cl2
solvent system to give firstly ketone 13 (17.0mg, 39%),
7. Synthesis of azide 7a: Cyclic sulfate 6 (0.48g, 0.79mmol)
was dissolved in dry DMF (50mL) with stirring under N2.
NaN3 (0.52g, 7.92mmol) was added and the reaction
mixture heated to 80ꢁC. After 5h TLC showed complete
consumption of starting material and the reaction mixture
was allowed to cool to rt and concentrated in vacuo to
give a brown solid. The brown solid was redissolved in
THF (20mL), 20% H2SO4 (5mL) was added and the
resulting mixture stirred vigorously for 18h. The reaction
mixture was partitioned between EtOAc (200mL) and
H2O (100mL) and the organic layer was washed with H2O
(200mL), saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution (150mL),
brine (2 · 200mL), dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in
vacuo to give crude azido alcohol. Purification by flash
column chromatography using 5% MeOH–CH2Cl2 as the
solvent system yielded 7a as an orange solid (0.41g, 91%);
mp 267–269ꢁC; (Found: m/z (FAB+) M+ 568.1836
C33H24N6O4 requires 568.1859); mmax (CHCl3)/cmꢀ1
3449, 2930, 2108, 1750, 1695, 1385, 1350; dH (DMSO-d6,
500MHz) 2.76 (1H, d, J 14.8, 10-Ha), 3.28 (1H, ddd, J
14.8, 7.5, 6.5, 10-Hb), 3.74 (3H, s, OMe), 3.87 (1H, dd, J
5.3, 4.8, 30-H), 4.45 (1H, dd, J 5.9, 5.3, 40-H) 4.84 (2H, s,
CH2Ar), 5.40 (1H, d, J 7.5, 20-H), 5.93 (1H, dd, J 6.5, 5.9,
50-H), 6.35 (1H, d, J 4.8, OH), 6.94 (2H, d, J 8.8, PMB),
7.39 (2H, d J 8.8, PMB), 7.45 (2H, dd, J 8.4, 7.2, 3-H, 9-
H), 7.70 (2H, dd, J 8.2, 7.2, 2-H, 10-H), 7.94 (1H, d, J 8.2,
11-H), 7.95 (1H, d, J 8.2, 1-H), 9.07 (1H, d, J 8.4, 8-H),
9.09 (1H, d, J 8.4, 4-H); dC (DMSO-d6, 125MHz) 36.3 (10-
CH2), 41.0 (CH2Ar), 56.0 (OMe), 59.6 (50-CH) 63.1 (20-
CH), 72.2 (40-CH), 83.6 (30-CH), 111.1 (CH) 111.2 (CH),
114.9 (PMB-CH), 116.6 (C), 116.8 (C), 119.5 (C), 119.6
(C), 121.6 (2CH), 122.0 (2C), 125.4 (CH), 125.5 (CH),
128.0 (CH), 128.2 (CH), 129.3 (C), 129.6 (C), 129.9 (PMB-
CH), 130.4 (C), 141.0 (C), 142.6 (C), 159.5 (C), 170.1
(CO), 170.2 (CO); m/z (FAB+) 569 (M++H, 8%), 568 (M+,
12), 419 (5), 329 (5), 289 (15), 137 (52), 108 (5), 77 (13).
8. Cyclic sulfate ring opening by heating in neat amine has
been used previously, see, for example, Hirsenkorn, R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 7591.
26
½aꢁD ꢀ 62:9 (c 0.60, CHCl3); mp >280ꢁC; (Found: m/z
(FAB+) M+ 525.1663. C33H23N3O4 requires 525.1689);
m
max (CHCl3)/cmꢀ1 1753, 1697, 1384, 1349; dH (DMSO-d6,
500MHz) 2.49 (1H, dd, J 3.1, 19.4, 40-Ha), 3.07 (1H, dd, J
7.0, 19.7, 40-Hb), 3.26 (1H, dd, J 6.8, 19.4, 40-Ha), 3.53
(1H, m, 10-Hb), 3.74 (3H, s, OMe), 4.76 (2H, s, CH2PMB),
5.59 (1H, d, J 8.1, 20-H), 6.14 (1H, dd, J 6.8, 6.4, 20-H),
6.92 (2H, d, J 8.8, PMB), 7.35 (2H, d J 8.8, PMB), 7.45
(2H, dd, J 7.3, 7.9, 3-H, 9-H), 7.67 (2H, dd, J 6.7, 8.1, 2-H,
10-H), 7.89 (1H, d, J 8.4, 11-H), 7.97 (1H, d, J 8.4, 1-H),
9.04 (1H, d, J 7.9, 8-H), 9.05 (1H, d, J 7.9, 4-H); dC
(DMSO-d6, 100MHz) 37.3 (10-CH2), 40.9 (CH2PMB),
45.0 (40-CH2), 54.1 (50-CH), 56.0 (OMe), 58.3 (20-CH),
110.8 (CH), 111.0 (CH), 114.9 (PMB-CH and C), 116.6
(C), 116.9 (C) 119.3 (C), 119.9 (C), 121.6 (CH), 121.8
(CH), 121.9 (C), 125.4 (CH), 125.5 (CH), 128.1 (CH),
128.2 (CH), 128.9 (C), 129.2 (C), 129.9 (PMB-CH), 130.3
(C), 141.0 (C), 141.2 (C), 159.4 (C), 169.9 (2CO), 215.1
(CO).
Diol 5 was also recovered (5.0mg, 11%).
16. Our lack of success in obtaining a high yield and
enantiomeric excess in the asymmetric hydroboration (or
hydrosilylation) of alkene 1 was another reason that the
new cyclic sulfate rearrangement was pursued. Hydro-
boration of 1 with excess (ꢀ)-(Ipc)2BH, followed by the