6
and I, have been shown to undergo the 1,2-migration during
simulate such a base with a simple three-water molecule
14
this process. Traditionally, generation of metal-vinylidenes
from alkynes is well-precedented for W, Mo, Ru, Rh, Ir,
Co, Mn, and Re complexes; however, it has recently been
cluster. Employment of pyridine or the substrate molecules
as proton shuttles in place of the water cluster in DFT
calculations did not affect the overall energetic profile of
1
7
8
15
evidenced to play a key role in Pt- and Au-catalyzed
the reaction. The computed energy surface for the AuBr-
16
transformations. Along this line, we recently reported the
Au-catalyzed cycloisomerization of propargylpyridines 1 into
indolizines, featuring the 1,2-shifts of H- and Si-, Sn-, and
Ge-containing groups via a putative Au-vinylidene interme-
catalyzed cycloisomerization of propargylpyridine 1′ pos-
sessing a terminal alkyne moiety is provided in Figure 1.
8
a,b
diate i (eq 1).
Besides, based on the DFT-computational
and labeling experiments, formation of Pt-vinylidene species
was established by Yamamoto in the synthesis of indenes
7
a
(
eq 2). Furthermore, F u¨ rstner observed a 1,2-halogen shift
in the phenanthrene synthesis, proceeding through the Au-
8c
vinylidene (eq 3), intermediacy of which was later validated
8
d
by the DFT calculations. Nonetheless, evidence was
8
e,9
12
accumulated in support of alternative pathways in Au-,
Pt-,
2
d,10
11
and even “classical” W- and Ru-catalyzed
processes that could account for the reactivities commonly
attributed to the alkyne-metal-vinylidene isomerization. This
prompted us to investigate the validity of the proposed Au-
vinylidene species i in the Au-catalyzed cycloisomerization
of 1 (eq 1). Herein, we report our theoretical and experi-
mental results on the mechanism of this transformation. Our
studies indicate that the observed 1,2-H and 1,2-Si shifts are,
indeed, outcomes of a sequence of elementary steps alterna-
tive to the formation of the Au-vinylidene.
Figure 1. Potential energy surfaces for the AuBr-catalyzed cycloi-
somerization of terminal pyridylalkynes 1′.
According to it, coordination of AuBr to the alkyne moiety
of 1′ gives the π-complex 2′ with the free energy decreased
by 15.7 kcal/mol in toluene solution. A subsequent alkyne-
vinylidene isomerization of 2′ should occur via the transition
To shed light on a mechanism of the above-mentioned
13
cycloisomerization, DFT calculations have been performed
first. Considering the fact that a basic pyridine moiety of a
substrate may play a significant role in possible H-migration
steps during the cycloisomerization of 1, we decided to
(
9) Dias Jurberg, I.; Odabachian, Y.; Gagosz, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
1
32, 3543.
(10) Vadola, P. A.; Sames, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16525.
(11) (a) Maeyama, K.; Iwasawa, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1928.
(
b) Iwasawa, N.; Maeyama, K.; Kusama, H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3871. (c)
Kusama, H.; Yamabe, H.; Iwasawa, N. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2569. (d)
Iwasawa, N.; Miura, T.; Kiyota, K.; Kusama, H.; Lee, K.; Lee, P. H. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 4463. See also: (e) Onizawa, Y.; Kusama, H.; Iwasawa, N.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 802.
(
(
6) (a) Miura, T.; Iwasawa, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 518.
7) (a) Bajracharya, G. B.; Pahadi, N. K.; Gridnev, I. D.; Yamamoto,
Y. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6204. (b) Tobisu, M.; Nakai, H.; Chatani, N.
J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5471. (c) Bigeault, J.; Giordano, L.; de Riggi, I.;
Gimbert, Y.; Buono, G. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3567. (d) Mart ´ı n-Matute, B.;
Nevado, C.; C a´ rdenas, D. J.; Echavarren, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
(12) Lin, M.-Y.; Maddirala, S. J.; Liu, R.-S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1745.
(13) The B3LYP/6-31G*(LANL2DZ for Au and Br) method was used
for all the calculations, and solvation effect was calculated by the CPCM
model. See Supporting Information for details.
1
25, 5757.
(
8) (a) Seregin, I. V.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
(14) For examples of DFT calculations demonstrating the importance
of the water molecule or water clusters in various catalytic reactions, see:
(a) Shi, F.-Q.; Li, X.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Z.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 15503. (b) Rossin, A.; Gonsalvi, L.; Phillips, A. D.; Maresca,
O.; Lled o´ s, A.; Peruzzini, M. Organometallics 2007, 26, 3289. (c) Xia, Y.;
Liang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, M.; Jiao, L.; Huang, F.; Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Yu,
Z.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3470.
1
2
2
2
2050. (b) Seregin, I. V.; Schammel, A. W.; Gevorgyan, V. Tetrahedron
008, 64, 6876. (c) Mamane, V.; Hannen, P.; F u¨ rstner, A. Chem.sEur. J.
004, 10, 4556. (d) Soriano, E.; Marco-Contelles, J. Organometallics 2006,
5, 4542. (e) Raba aˆ , H.; Engels, B.; Hupp, T.; Hashmi, A. S. K. Int. J.
Quantum Chem. 2007, 107, 359. (f) Lavallo, V.; Frey, G. D.; Kousar, S.;
Donnadieu, B.; Bertrand, G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 13569.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 23, 2010
5539