1492 J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2000, Vol. 43, No. 8
Rautio et al.
from 2b (0.96 g, 3.2 mmol) and 4-morpholinylacetic acid (0.46
g, 3.2 mmol). Flash chromatography (5% MeOH in CH2Cl2)
gave 3b as a viscous oil (0.27 g, 20%): TLC Rf 0.68 (5% MeOH
ity of naproxen. The permeability coefficients of the
prodrugs which, unlike flux, are independent of donor
concentration were 0.3-160- and 0.001-3-fold higher
than that of naproxen at pH 7.4 and 5.0, respectively.
The permeability of these compounds in aqueous solu-
tions increased as the solubility decreased. Thus, 3a ,
having the lowest aqueous solubility among all pro-
drugs, showed the highest permeability coefficient while
its value for flux was much lower than that for any other
compound. Therefore, the flux, which measures the
mass of material transported through the skin, is a more
relevant parameter, therapeutically, than the perme-
ability coefficient. Finally, comparing the flux and
solubilities of these compounds confirms earlier obser-
vations which indicated that an effective prodrug for
topical drug delivery must possess good biphasic solu-
bility characteristics: i.e., adequate aqueous solubility
as well as lipophilicity over the parent drug.21,22,29
In conclusion, the present study shows that the
permeation of naproxen through human skin can be
markedly improved by using bioreversible methylpip-
erazinylacyloxyalkyl prodrugs of naproxen. The ioniz-
able basic prodrugs combine the desirable aqueous
solubility and lipophilicity for skin permeation, which
can vary widely by changing the acyl group. Further-
more, these prodrugs were rapidly bioconverted to the
parent drug in human serum. These properties make
these novel methylpiperazinylacyloxyalkyl esters prom-
ising prodrugs for improved topical delivery of naproxen.
1
in CH2Cl2); H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.72-7.11 (6H, m,
aromatic), 4.10 (2H, t, J ) 6.1 Hz, OCH2-), 4.06 (2H, t, J )
6.1 Hz, OCH2-), 3.92 (3H, s, CH3O), 3.85 (1H, q, J ) 7.1 Hz,
CHMe), 3.74 (4H, t, J ) 4.7 Hz, CH2OCH2), 3.15 (2H, s, -CH2-
COO), 2.55 (4H, t, J ) 4.6 Hz, CH2NCH2), 1.62 (4H, m,
CCH2CH2C), 1.58 (3H, d, J ) 7.2 Hz, CH3C); HRMS m/z
429.2281, calcd for C24H31NO6 429.2151. Anal. (C24H31NO6‚
0.5H2O) C, H, N.
2-[(4-Meth yl-1-piper azin yl)acetyloxy]eth yl (6-Meth oxy-
2-n a p h th yl)p r op a n oa te (3c). 3c was prepared as described
for 3a from 2a (0.39 g, 1.4 mmol) and (4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-
acetic acid (0.24 g, 1.5 mmol), DMAP (70 mg, 0.6 mmol), and
DCC (0.44 g, 2.1 mmol). The flash chromatography (20%
MeOH in CH2Cl2) provided 3c as a viscous oil (0.41 g, 71%):
TLC Rf 0.45 (50% MeOH in CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400
MHz) δ 7.71-7.11 (6H, m, aromatic), 4.29 (4H, m, OCH2CH2O,),
3.91 (3H, s, CH3O), 3.84 (1H, q, J ) 7.1 Hz, CHMe), 3.02 (2H,
s, -CH2COO), 2.54 (8H, bm, N(CH2CH2)2N), 2.33 (3H, s,
NCH3), 1.56 (3H, d, J ) 7.1 Hz, CH3C); HRMS m/z 414.2208,
calcd for C24H31NO6 414.2155. Anal. (C23H30N2O5‚0.8H2O) C,
H; N: calcd, 6.53; found, 5.97.
4-[(4-Meth yl-1-p ip er a zin yl)a cetyloxy]bu tyl 2-(6-Meth -
oxy-2-n a p h th yl)p r op a n oa te (3d ). 3d was prepared as de-
scribed for 3a from 2b (0.85 g, 2.8 mmol) and (4-methyl-1-
piperazinyl)acetic acid (0.44 g, 2.8 mmol). Flash chromatography
(10% MeOH in CH2Cl2) gave 3d (0.50 g, 40%) as a viscous oil:
TLC Rf 0.42 (50% MeOH in CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400
MHz) δ 7.71-7.10 (6H, m, aromatic), 4.07 (4H, m, OCH2-),
3.91 (3H, s, CH3O), 3.84 (1H, q, J ) 7.1 Hz, CHMe), 3.16 (2H,
s, -CH2COO), 2.6-2.5 (8H, bm, N(CH2CH2)2N), 2.33 (3H, s,
NCH3), 1.62 (4H, m, CCH2CH2C), 1.56 (3H, d, J ) 7.1 Hz,
CH3C); HRMS m/z 442.2569, calcd for C25H34N2O5 442.2468.
Anal. (C25H34N2O5‚0.5H2O) C, H, N.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l P r oced u r es. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were
recorded on a Bruker AM 400 WB operating at 400.1 MHz,
and chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (δ) using
TMS as the internal standard. The splitting pattern abbrevia-
tions are as follows: s ) singlet, d ) doublet, t ) triplet, q )
quartet, qui ) quintet, m ) multiplet, dt ) doublet of triplets,
bs ) broad singlet, bm ) broad multiplet. Electron impact (EI)
mass spectra of the prodrugs were determined by a VG 70-
250SE magnetic sector mass spectrometer (VG Analytical,
Manchester, U.K.). Flash chromatography was accomplished
using silica gel (30-60 µm, J . T. Baker 7024-02). Thin-layer
chromatography (TLC) analyses of reactions were run on
aluminum foil plates coated with silica gel 60 F254 (Merck).
Elemental analysis was carried out by a Perkin-Elmer Series
II CHNS/O Analyzer 2400.
4-[3-(4-Meth yl-1-p ip er a zin yl)p r op ion yloxy]bu tyl 2-(6-
Meth oxy-2-n a p h th yl)p r op a n oa te (3e). 3e was prepared as
described for 3a from 2b (2.0 g, 6.6 mmol) and 3-(4-methyl-
1-piperazinyl)propionic acid (1.2 g, 6.9 mmol). Flash chroma-
tography (50% MeOH in CH2Cl2) gave 3e (2.45 g, 54%) as a
viscous oil: TLC Rf 0.39 (50% MeOH in CH2Cl2); 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.72-7.11 (6H, m, aromatic), 4.10 (1H, t,
J ) 6.4 Hz, CO2CH2-), 4.09 (1H, t, J ) 6.1 Hz, CO2CH2-),
4.02 (2H, t, J ) 6.1 Hz, CH2O2C-), 3.91 (3H, s, CH3O) 3.85
(1H, q, J ) 7.2 Hz CHMe), 2.66 (2H, t, J ) 7.3 Hz, -CH2-
COO), 2.45 (2H, t, J ) 7.5 Hz, CH2N), 2.6-2.3 (8H, bm, N(CH2-
CH2)2N), 2.27 (3H, s, NCH3), 1.7-1.5 (4H, m, CCH2CH2C), 1.57
(3H, d, J ) 7.0 Hz, CH3C); HRMS m/z 456.2728, calcd for
C
26H36N2O5 456.2624. Anal. (C26H36N2O5‚0.7H2O) C, H, N.
4-[4-(4-Met h yl-1-p ip er a zin yl)b u t yr yloxy]b u t yl 2-(6-
All reagents were obtained from commercial suppliers and
were used without further purification.The hydroxyalkyl esters
of naproxen (2a ,b) were synthesized and identified as de-
scribed earlier.12
Meth oxy-2-n a p h th yl)p r op a n oa te (3f). 3f was prepared as
described for 3a from 2b (1.0 g, 3.3 mmol) and 4-(4-methyl-
1-piperazinyl)butyric acid (0.61 g, 3.3 mmol). Flash chroma-
tography (MeOH) gave 3f (1.17 g, 75%) as a viscous oil: TLC
Rf 0.35 (50% MeOH in CH2Cl2); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ
7.72-7.11 (6H, m, aromatic), 4.10 (1H, t, J ) 6.4 Hz, CO2CH2-
), 4.09 (1H, t, J ) 6.1 Hz, CO2CH2-), 4.00 (2H, t, J ) 6.2 Hz,
CO2CH2-), 3.91 (3H, s, CH3O) 3.85 (1H, q, J ) 7.2 Hz, CHMe),
2.6-2.3 (8H, bm, N(CH2CH2)2N), 2.33 (2H, t, J ) 7.3 Hz, -CH2-
COO), 2.29 (2H, m, CH2N), 2.27 (3H, s, NCH3), 1.78 (2H, m, J
) 7.4 Hz, CCH2C), 1.7-1.5 (4H, m, CCH2CH2C), 1.57 (3H, d,
J ) 7.3 Hz, CH3C); HRMS m/z 470.2593, calcd for C27H38N2O5
470.2781. Anal. (C27H38N2O5‚0.5H2O) C, H, N.
4-Mor p h olin yla cetic Acid . Morpholine (5.5 g, 63 mmol)
in 10 mL of benzene was added dropwise to a solution of ethyl
bromoacetate (5.5 g, 33 mmol) in 10 mL of benzene and the
solution was refluxed for 30 min.30 After cooling, morpholine
hydrobromide was filtered and the filtrate was evaporated to
provide ethyl 4-morpholinylacetate (5.2 g, 91%) as a yellowish
liquid: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 1.28 (3H, t), 2.58 (4H, t),
3.21 (2H, s), 3.75 (4H, t), 4.19 (2H, q). A portion of the above
ester (3.3 g, in 75 mL of water) was refluxed for 30 h. Water
was evaporated and the residue was recrystallized form
2-[(4-Mor ph olin yl)acetyloxy]eth yl 2-(6-Meth oxy-2-n aph -
th yl)p r op a n oa te (3a ). To a solution of 2-hydroxyethyl 2-(6-
methoxy-2-naphthyl)propanoate (2a ) (0.32 g, 1.2 mmol), 4-mor-
pholinylacetic acid (0.18 g, 1.2 mmol), and DMAP (40 mg, 0.2
mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (15 mL) was added DCC (0.41 g, 2.0
mmol) and the mixture was stirred at 30 °C for 3 days. The
precipitated dicyclohexylurea (DCU) was filtered, and the
filtrate was evaporated. The resulting residue was purified by
flash silica gel column chromatography, eluting with 5% MeOH
in CH2Cl2 and affording 3a as a white solid (0.19 g, 40%): mp
84.9-85.6 °C; TLC Rf 0.56 (5% MeOH in CH2Cl2); 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.72-7.11 (6H, m, aromatic), 4.27 (4H,
m, OCH2CH2O), 3.91 (3H, s, CH3O) 3.86 (1H, q, J ) 7.1 Hz,
CHMe), 3.69 (4H, m, CH2OCH2), 3.00 (2H, s, -CH2COO), 2.43
(4H, m, CH2NCH2), 1.58 (3H, d, J ) 7.1 Hz, CH3C); HRMS
m/z 401.1918, calcd for C22H27NO6 401.1838. Anal. C: calcd,
65.82; found, 66.74; H, N.
4-[(4-Mor ph olin yl)acetyloxy]bu tyl 2-(6-Meth oxy-2-n aph -
th yl)p r op a n oa te (3b). 3b was prepared as described for 3a