Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article
supercritically dried and coated with a fine carbon layer. Afterward,
the samples were examined by SEM using secondary and backscatter
electron detectors. ICP-OES measurements were carried out in a
Varian 715 ICP optical emission spectrometer.
Synthesis of 2′-(4-Nitrophenoxycarbonyl)paclitaxel (1). 2′-(4-
Nitrophenoxycarbonyl)paclitaxel, 1, was synthesized according to the
literature procedure.11
replaced with fresh media, containing compounds PTX and Pro-PTX
(0.001−10 μM). Untreated cells were incubated with DMSO (0.1%
v/v). After 3 days of incubation, PrestoBlue cell viability reagent (10%
v/v) was added to each well and the plate was incubated for 90 min.
Fluorescence emission was detected using a PerkinElmer EnVision
2101 multilabel reader (Ex/Em: 540/590 nm). All conditions were
normalized to the untreated cells (100%) and curves were fitted using
GraphPad Prism using a sigmoidal variable slope curve. Experiments
were performed in triplicate.
Prodrug-into-Drug Conversion Studies. Pro-PTX (100 μM) was
dissolved in PBS (1 mL) with 2 mg of Pd devices (Pd-resin diameter
size 30 μm, prepared as previously reported41) and incubated at 37 °C
in a Thermomixer at 1200 rpm for 10 h. Reaction crudes were
centrifuged (13 000 rpm, 5 min) to sediment the Pd devices and
supernatants were analyzed by LCMS/MS (Agilent 1200) using a
micrOTOF II detector. PTX (100 μM) was dissolved in PBS (1 mL)
for 10 h and analyzed as a positive control.
Synthesis of N-(Propargyloxycarbonyl)-N,N′-dimethylethylene-
diamine (4). Tert-butyl methyl[2-(methylamino)ethyl]carbamate, 2
(284 mg, 1.5 mmol), and pyridine (275 μL, 3.4 mmol) were dissolved
in a mix of H2O:1,4-dioxane (3:6, 9 mL). A solution of propargyl
chloroformate (221 μL, 2.3 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (1 mL) was then
added dropwise to the mixture at room temperature and the reaction
was stirred overnight. Subsequently, solvents were removed by rotary
evaporation, the crude was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (20 mL), and the
mixture was washed with an aqueous solution of 1 N HCl (2 × 15
mL) and water (2 × 15 mL). The organic phase was dried over
anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated by rotary evaporation. The crude
residue was purified by flash chromatography with 2.5% MeOH in
CH2Cl2 to give compound 3 as a pale oil. Rf = 0.48 (5% MeOH in
CH2Cl2). Without further characterization, compound 3 was then
dissolved in a 9:1 (v/v) mixture of TFA/water (5 mL) and the
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Solvents were
removed by rotary evaporation and the addition of cold diethyl ether
(10 mL) afforded pure compound 4 as a yellow solid (90% yield, two
steps). Rf = 0.15 (5% MeOH in CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (500 MHz,
DMSO-d6) δ 8.48 (s, 1H), 4.68 (s, 2H), 3.55 (s, 1H), 3.50 (t, J = 6.0
Hz, 2H), 3.08 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 2.87 (s, 3H), 2.58 (s, 3H). 13C
NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 155.8 (C), 79.5 (C), 78.0 (CH), 53.4
(CH2), 46.5 (CH2), 45.5 (CH2), 34.4 (CH3), 33.2 (CH3). HRMS
(ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C8H15N2O2, 171.11280; found,
171.11360.
Synthesis of Pro-PTX. Compound 1 (14 mg, 14 μmol) was
dissolved in dry DMF (1 mL) under a N2 atmosphere and cooled
down to 0 °C. Compound 4 (7 mg, 42 μmol) and DIPEA (12 μL, 70
μmol) were dissolved in dry DMF (0.5 mL) and added dropwise to
the solution and the mixture was allowed to reach room temperature
and stirred overnight. The solvent was removed by rotary evaporation
and the crude was purified via semipreparative TLC chromatography
(2.5% MeOH in CH2Cl2) to yield a white solid (36% yield). Rf = 0.40
(5% MeOH in CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.17 (d, J
= 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.98−7.94 (m, 2H), 7.87−7.81 (m, 2H), 7.73 (t, J =
7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.59−7.53 (m, 1H), 7.49 (t, J =
7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.47−7.43 (m, 4H), 7.19−7.17 (m, 1H), 6.29 (s, 1H),
5.87−5.81 (m, 1H), 5.66−5.54 (m, 1H), 5.41 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H),
5.30−5.12 (m, 1H), 4.88 (dd, J = 14.5, 8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.62−4.52 (m,
2H), 4.13−4.08 (m, 1H), 4.03−3.97 (m, 2H), 3.58 (d, J = 7.1 Hz,
1H), 3.46 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 3.40 (s, 1H), 2.88 (s, 1H), 2.85 (s,
1H), 2.81 (s, 1H), 2.77 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (d, J = 0.6 Hz, 2H),
2.35−2.20 (m, 4H), 2.10 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H), 1.81−1.78 (m, 4H),
1.62 (t, J = 13.0 Hz, 2H), 1.49 (s, 4H), 1.34 (s, 1H), 1.22 (s, 2H),
1.01 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 202.9,
170.1, 169.2, 167.0, 165.7, 155.1, 140.9, 140.4, 137.8, 134.7, 134.0,
131.9, 130.5, 130.1, 129.2, 128.8, 128.6, 128.2, 127.8, 126.8, 116.6,
84.1, 80.7, 79.6, 77.6, 77.2, 76.5, 75.8, 75.2, 75.0, 71.1, 70.9, 66.1,
65.5, 60.2, 57.8, 55.4, 54.5, 52.9, 46.6, 43.4, 37.0, 34.9, 33.7, 32.9,
26.8, 23.0, 21.9, 21.2, 21.1, 20.8, 19.3, 15.6, 14.6, 14.4, 10.2. HRMS
(ESI) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C56H64N3O17, 1050.42302; found,
1050.42120. Purity as measured by HPLC was >99%.
Preparation of Pd Nanosheets. The synthesis of Pd nanosheets
was based on previously reported protocols,30,55,56 but with
modifications to avoid the use of toxic quaternary ammonium salts.
The palladium growth solution was prepared by mixing 11 mg of
Na2PdCl4, 30 mg of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (MW = 55 000), and 130
mg of KBr in Milli-Q water (400 μL). The resulting homogeneous red
solution was mixed with 4 mL of DMF. The Pd nanosheet precursor
solution was introduced into a high-pressure stainless-steel Teflon-
lined reactor. CO gas was introduced into the high-pressure reactor to
reduce the Pd precursor and control the anisotropic shape of the Pd
nanostructures.55 The pressure inside the reactor was maintained at 6
bar and the reactor was placed in a heated water bath (80 °C for 40
min). The solution was gently stirred with a magnetic flea located on
the high-pressure reactor. A dark blue colloid was obtained after the
CO treatment. Pd nanosheets were collected by centrifugation
(10 000 rpm, 10 min) by mixing the dark blue colloid and acetone in
a volume ratio of 1 to 3. Finally, Pd nanosheets were dispersed in
Milli-Q water and kept at 5 °C for further use. The Pd concentration
was determined by MP-AES (Microwave Plasma-Atomic Emission
Spectrometer 4100 Agilent Technologies) and the optical properties
were analyzed by UV−VIS spectrophotometry (Jasco V-670). TEM
(Tecnai FEI T20) was used to study the Pd nanosheet morphology by
operating at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV with a LaB6 electron
source fitted with a SuperTwin objective lens allowing a point-to-
point resolution of 2.4 Å. TEM images showed that the Pd nanosheets
tend to stack during the drying process of the TEM grid preparation.
This effect enabled us to observe the ultrathin sheetlike morphology
and made their direct thickness measurement easy. Leaching of Pd
nanosheets after incubation for 24 h in PBS was studied by ICP-OES
using a Varian 715 ICP optical emission spectrometer.
Preparation of Pd Agarose. Pd nanosheets were embedded in
agarose hydrogels (5 mg/mL) with a Pd concentration of 0.4 mg/mL.
Agarose powder (UltraPure Agarose, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was
weighted in an Eppendorf tube and sterilized by UV radiation. Milli-Q
water was filtered through a 0.22 μm mesh filter and was added to the
agarose powder. The mixture was shaken and warmed at 80 °C for 5
min to achieve a complete solution. The solution obtained was added
on a prewarmed Pd nanosheet suspension and was homogenized by
pipetting up and down several times. Immediately after, 60 μL of the
suspension was pipetted into tissue culture inserts (Corning
Transwell), placed in a 24-well plate, and allowed to cool at room
temperature for 1 h. Afterward, the 24-well plate was sterilized under
UV radiation for 30 min before characterization and use in cell assays.
Preparation of Pd Alginate. Pd nanosheets were embedded in
alginate hydrogels with a Pd nanosheet concentration of 0.3 mg/mL.
Sodium alginate powder (Sigma Aldrich, W201502) was dissolved in
sterile water and Pd nanosheets were added and vortexed until
homogenization. The mixture was sterilized under UV for 15 min.
The suspension was added dropwise into standard cell culture
medium (DMEM, 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine) supplemented with
100 mM CaCl2 dihydrate in 24-well plates to form dark alginate
beads. Beads were washed twice with DMEM and transferred to the
Synthesis of O-Propargyl-resorufin. Pro-Res was synthesized
according to the literature procedure.30
Cell Viability Study: PTX vs Pro-PTX. A549 cells (a kind gift from
Dr. Wilkinson) and U87 cells (a kind gift from Dr. Gammoh) were
seeded in a 96-well plate format (at 1500 and 2000 cells/well,
respectively) in DMEM supplemented with 10% of FBS and L-
glutamine (2 mM) and incubated in a tissue culture incubator at 37
°C and 5% CO2 for 24 h before treatment. HBVPs (a kind gift from
Dr. Caporali) were seeded at 10 000 cells (to reach confluency) in
pericyte media (ScienCell Research Laboratories, Inc.) on gelatin
(0.1%)/fibronectin (10 μg/mL)-precoated dishes. Each well was then
G
J. Med. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX