permeability coefficient of PVA/GO-POSS coated film was only 0.67×10-11 cm3·cm·cm-2·s-1·cmHg-1 and just one-fifth
of pristine PVA-coated film, while the values for PVA/GO and PVA/GO-CD coated films were 1.47 and 0.76 ×10-11
cm3·cm·cm-2·s-1·cmHg-1, respectively. This demonstrated that on one hand GO-derived nanofillers were efficient gas
barrier materials and could greatly decreased oxygen transmission rate of polymer film, while on the other hand
even compared with hot nanofiller GO, as-prepared GO-POSS was still the most efficient nanofiller and exhibited
impressive oxygen barrier behaviors. We think the main reason was the coexistence of two efficient gas barrier
nano-components (GO and POSS) in one supramolecular assembly. The presence of impermeable nanofillers
prolonged gas diffusion path and decreased the gas permeability. Moreover, to our delight, undergoing UV
irradiation before blending GO-POSS with PVA solution, the oxygen permeability coefficient of PVA/GO-POSS
coated film was further decreased 82.2% compared with films without UV irradiation and almost improved oxygen
barrier property 30 times than pristine PVA-coated film, which suggested that incorporation of as-prepared light-
responsive GO-POSS could endow conventional packaging film with attractive ability of dynamically controlling
oxygen transmission rate of polymer films, which was crucial requirement for future intelligent packaging. The
mechanism behind will be specifically investigated and discussed in our next future paper.
In conclusion, an easy and convenient strategy to design and prepare novel light-responsive GO-POSS
nanocomposites was proposed based on host-guest chemisty. UV-vis spectroscopy and TEM clearly indicated that
depending on the reversible inclusion/exclusion of GO-CD and Azo-POSS, the prepared GO-POSS exhibited
remarkable supramolecular assembly/disassembly behavior upon UV/vis irradiation. Due to the good dispersity in
water and many other solvents, GO-POSS could be easily incorporated into convention polymer films and had
significant impact on oxygen barrier properties of materials. Under visible illumination, the oxygen permeability
coefficient of PVA/GO-POSS coated film was only 0.67×10-11 cm3·cm·cm-2·s-1·cmHg-1 and just one-fifth of pristine
PVA-coated film, while upon UV irradiation before blending, the oxygen permeability coefficient of PVA/GO-POSS
coated film could be further decreased 82.2% down to 0.12×10-11 cm3·cm·cm-2·s-1·cmHg-1. This kind of novel light-
responsive GO-POSS would endow conventional packaging film with attractive ability of dynamically controlling
oxygen transmission rate and have promising applications in future intelligent packaging.
Acknowledgment
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51503181) for financial support.
References
[1] S. Guragain, B.P. Bastakoti, V. Malgras, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 21 (2015) 13164-13174.
[2] L. Yang, W. Xiaowen, F. Bin, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 25 (2015) 5047-5056.
[3] E.G. Kelley, J.N.L. Albert, M.O. Sullivan, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 7057-7071.
[4] P. Kaner, X. Hu, S.W. Thomas, et al., Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (2017) 13619-13631.
[5] W. Lee, D. Kim, J. Lim, et al., Sens. Actuators B 266 (2018) 724-729.
[6] M.L. Wei, Y.F. Gao, X. Li, et al., Polym. Chem. 8 (2017) 127-143.
[7] O. Bertrand, J.F. Gohy, Polym. Chem. 8 (2017) 52-73.
[8] J.-F. Gohy, Y. Zhao, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 7117-7129.
[9] L.N. Fu, B. Leng, Y.S. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 27 (2016) 1319-1329.
[10] C. Kyoung-Yong, S.Y. Jun, J. Sunghwan, et al., Small 14 (2018) 1703618.
[11] K. Ke, Z.K. Du, X.Y. Chang, et al., Colloid Polym. Sci. 295 (2017) 1851-1861.
[12] X.J. Liao, G.S. Chen, Chin. Chem. Lett. 27 (2016) 583-587.
[13] X.J. Zhang, X. Ma, K. Wang, et al., Macromol. Rapid Commun. 39 (2018) 1800142.
[14] B.W. Liu, H. Zhou, S.T. Zhou, et al., Eur. Polym. J. 65 (2015) 63-81.
[15] P. Shi, E. Ju, Z. Yan, et al., Nat. Commun. 7 (2016) 13088.
[16] C.N.R. Rao, A.K. Sood, K.S. Subrahmanyam, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (2009) 7752-7777.
[17] A.K. Geim, Science 324 (2009) 1530-1534.
[18] K. Tanaka, Y. Chujo, J. Mater. Chem. 22 (2012) 1733-1746.
[19] G. Potsi, A. Rossos, A. Kouloumpis, et al., Curr. Org. Chem. 20 (2016) 662-673.
[20] Y.N. Lu, S.L. Zhang, Z. Geng, et al., New J. Chem. 41 (2017) 3089-3096.
[21] Y.J. Guo, S.J. Guo, J.T. Ren, et al., ACS Nano, 4 (2010) 4001-4010.
[22] O.C. Compton, S. Kim, C. Pierre, et al., Adv. Mater. 22 (2010) 4759-4763.
[23] Y.B. Cui, S.I. Kundalwal, S. Kumar, Carbon 98 (2016) 313-333.
[24] F. Mannle, T.R. Tofteberg, M. Skaugen, et al., J. Nanopart. Res. 13 (2011) 4691-4701.
[25] P. Iyer, G. Iyer, M. Coleman, J. Membr. Sci. 358 (2010) 26-32