Table 2 Elemental analysis found for HTC@180 and @550 before (A)
and after the hydrolysis (B) and the conjugate addition of PEG 480 (C)
maleic anhydride results in the appearance of anhydride peaks on
FTIR (Fig. S4, ESIw) and decreased %C on elemental analysis
(Table S1, ESIw). The modification of HTC carbon via the use
of dienophiles and its subsequent functionalization reactions
could be further extended as an attractive approach to prepare
novel carbon-based materials.
Entry
C%
H%
N%
S%
A-@180
B-@180
C-@180
A-@550
B-@550
C-@550
57.2
56.9
57.4
86.7
86.0
83.8
3.4
3.5
3.9
2.9
2.8
2.9
6.0
5.5
5.5
2.6
2.6
2.7
9.1
8.9
8.2
2.7
2.4
2.3
We would like to thank Dr Camillo Falco, Linghui Yu,
Dr Magdalena-Maria Titirici for providing HTC@180 and @550
precursors as well as for their help with taking the SEM
images. We would also like to thank Dr Marek Grzelczak
and Dr Stephanie A. Wohlgemuth for the numerous exciting and
insightful discussions. We also thank Dr Eugenia Maxinova for
her help with the fluorescent microscopy.
Furthermore, SEM images (Fig. S5, ESIw) showed no apparent
morphological differences between the unfunctionalized-,
DCDTO-functionalized-, and the hydrolyzed-HTC samples.
To prove the accessibility of surface bound thiols, polyethylene
glycol (PEG480) acrylate was used as the substrate for the
conjugate addition. The elemental analysis (Table 2, C-180 and
-550) and FTIR (Fig. S6, ESIw) of the PEGylated carbons
compared to thiol-functionalized HTC carbons (B-180 and -550)
indicated the success of the conjugate addition. Obvious changes in
the C% between HTC@180 samples were not observed due to the
similarity in C% between PEG acrylate and HTC@180 samples.
However, the decrease in S% is observed from C-180 supports the
successful conjugate addition of PEG acrylate onto B-180. To
further support the conjugate addition, anthracene acrylate was
prepared and utilized as a conjugate addition substrate. Although
the changes observed from the elemental analysis results were not as
obvious as with PEG acrylate, the change seen in the percent
composition of the HTC@180 sample was as anticipated (Table S2,
ESIw). However, no apparent change was observed from the
HTC@550 samples likely due to the inherent low degree of
available thiol groups for the conjugate addition.
Notes and references
1 B. Hu, K. Wang, L. Wu, S.-H. Yu, M. Antonietti and M.-M. Titirici,
Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 813–828.
2 A. Thomas, P. Kuhn, J. Weber, M. M. Titirici and M. Antonietti,
Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2009, 30, 221–236.
3 M. M. Titirici, R. J. White, C. Falco and M. Sevilla, Energy
Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 6796–6822.
4 X. M. Sun and Y. D. Li, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 597–601.
5 M.-M. Titirici and M. Antonietti, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 103–116.
6 R. Demir-Cakan, P. Makowski, M. Antonietti, F. Goettmann and
M.-M. Titirici, Catal. Today, 2010, 150, 115–118.
7 L. Zhao, X. Chen, X. Wang, Y. Zhang, W. Wei, Y. Sun,
M. Antonietti and M.-M. Titirici, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 3317–3321.
8 K. Tang, R. J. White, X. K. Mu, M. M. Titirici, P. A. van Aken
and J. Maier, ChemSusChem, 2012, 5, 400–403.
9 J. Popovic, R. Demir-Cakan, J. Tornow, M. Morcrette, D. S. Su,
R. Schloegl, M. Antonietti and M.-M. Titirici, Small, 2011, 7,
1127–1135.
10 R. Demir-Cakan, N. Baccile, M. Antonietti and M. M. Titirici,
Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 484–490.
To visualize the functionalization, fluorescent images of
anthracene acrylate functionalized HTC@180 and @550 were
taken. The samples were excited at a wavelength of 361 nm and
were detected at the emission wavelength of 402 nm. The images
of HTC@180 samples (Fig. 2c) clearly show the fluorescence
emission, further supporting the presence of anthracene acrylate
covalently attached to the carbon surface. On the other hand,
no fluorescence was observed from the HTC@550 samples
(Fig. S7, ESIw). The lack of fluorescence was attributed to a
low degree of functionalization due to the limited amount of
thiol groups in its precursor.
11 L. Zhao, L.-Z. Fan, M.-Q. Zhou, H. Guan, S. Qiao, M. Antonietti
and M.-M. Titirici, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 5202–5206.
12 A. Gandini, D. Coelho, M. Gomes, B. Reis and A. Silvestre,
J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 8656–8664.
13 A. Gandini, Polym. Chem., 2010, 1, 245–251.
14 M. Sevilla and A. B. Fuertes, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 4195–4203.
15 N. Baccile, G. Laurent, F. Babonneau, F. Fayon, M. M. Titirici
and M. Antonietti, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 9644–9654.
16 S. A. Wohlgemuth, R. J. White, M. G. Willinger, M. M. Titirici
and M. Antonietti, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 1515–1523.
17 S. A. Wohlgemuth, F. Vilela, M. M. Titirici and M. Antonietti,
Green Chem., 2012, 14, 741–749.
18 H. Kaper, A. Grandjean, C. Weidenthaler, F. Schueth and
F. Goettmann, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 4099–4106.
19 E. Bekyarova, S. Sarkar, S. Niyogi, M. E. Itkis and R. C. Haddon,
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2012, 45, 154009–154027.
20 S. Munirasu, J. Albuerne, A. Boschetti-de-Fierro and V. Abetz,
Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2010, 31, 574–579.
21 S. Sarkar, E. Bekyarova, S. Niyogi and R. C. Haddon, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 3324–3327.
22 C.-M. Chang and Y.-L. Liu, Carbon, 2009, 47, 3041–3049.
23 J. Ohshita, K. H. Lee, M. Hashimoto, Y. Kunugi, Y. Harima,
K. Yamashita and A. Kunai, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 1891–1894.
24 M. M. M. Raposo and G. Kirsch, Tetrahedron, 2003, 59,
4891–4899.
In conclusion, we have shown the facile functionalization of
HTC materials using reactive dienophiles (TCNE, MI). DCDTO
was utilized as a dienophile as well as a precursor to obtain
surface-thiol accessorized HTC carbons. The presence of the
thiol groups on the surfaces of HTC@180 and @550 was
demonstrated by successful conjugate addition with Michael
acceptors. To date, we have confirmation of other dienophiles,
such as maleic anhydride and tricyano-functionalized molecules,
being able to modify the HTC carbon surface in the preparation
of functional materials. Initial results show that the addition of
25 Z. Rappoport, J. Chem. Soc., 1963, 4498–4512.
c
10986 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 10984–10986
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012