Please do not adjust margins
Catalysis Science & Technology
Page 6 of 8
ARTICLE
Journal Name
and trifluoroacetic acid (30:70:0.1, v/v/v). The product (S)-2a
standard sample was prepared by the hydrolysis of 1a catalyzed
by E. coli whole cells of BjNIT6402 from Bradyrhizobium
japonicum USDA110 according to our previous work.33 The
retention times of (R)-2a, (S)-2a, 1a and rac-amide were 11.3,
12.0, 36.4, 15.9 and 16.5 min, respectively.
References
DOI: 10.1039/C8CY02455C
1
2
3
4
P. Ramesh, D. Suman and K. S. N. Reddy, Synthesis, 2018, 50,
211-226.
M. Ordóñez, C. Cativiela and I. Romero-Estudillo, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 2016, 27, 999-1055.
M. Ordóñez and C. Cativiela, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2007,
18, 3-99.
R. Patel and A. H. Dickenson, Pharma. Res. Per., 2016, 4,
e00205.
Analytical enzymatic desymmetrization of 3-substituted
glutaronitriles
5
6
7
J. E. Frampton, CNS Drugs, 2014, 28, 835-854.
P. Hudgson and D. Weightman, Br. Med. J., 1971, 4, 15-17.
N. G. Bowery, D. R. Hill, A. L. Hudson, A. Doble, D. N.
Middlemiss, J. Shaw and M. Turnbull, Nature, 1980, 283, 92-
94.
A. Mann, T. Boulanger, B. Brandau, F. Durant, G. Evrard, M.
Heaulme, E. Desaulles and C. G. Wermuth, J. Med. Chem.,
1991, 34, 1307-1313.
R. Lal, J. Sukbuntherng, E. H. L. Tai, S. Upadhyay, F. Yao, M. S.
Warren, W. Luo, L. Bu, S. Nguyen, J. Zamora, G. Peng, T. Dias,
Y. Bao, M. Ludwikow, T. Phan, R. A. Scheuerman, H. Yan, M.
Gao, Q. Q. Wu, T. Annamalai, S. P. Raillard, K. Koller, M. A.
Gallop and K. C. Cundy, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 2009, 330,
911-921.
The purified enzyme (0.1 mg) in 1 mL of sodium phosphate
buffer (100 mM, pH 7.0) with 5% (v/v) methanol and 10 mM 3-
substituted glutaronitriles was incubated at 30°C. The reaction
was stopped by the boiling water bath at 30 min for determining
the activity, and precipitated protein was removed by
centrifugation (14000 rpm, 2 min). The supernatant was
subjected to activity assay by the phenol hypochlorite
colorimetry. One unit of the enzyme activity was defined as the
amount of enzyme producing 1 µmol of ammonia per minute
under the conditions. A control experiment without enzyme
was performed for each substrate. The ee value was
determined by chiral HPLC. The methods of HPLC analysis and
retention times of the substrates and products are presented in
the Supporting Information.
8
9
10 J. Zhu, E. Mix and B. Winblad, CNS Drug Rev., 2001, 7, 387-
398.
11 P. von Rosenstiel, Neurotherapeutics, 2007, 4, 84-87.
12 J. R. Milovanović, S. M. Janković, A. Pejčić, M. Milosavljević, V.
Opančina, V. Radonjić, Z. Protrka and M. Kostić, Expert Opin.
Pharmacother., 2017, 18, 1381-1389.
Preparative scale biotransformation of 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-
cyanobutanoic acid (1a)
The biotransformation was carried out by using whole cells of
wt SsNIT and its mutant P194A/I201A/F202V (2.5 g wet weight)
in 47.5 mL sodium phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.0) and 3-(4-
chlorophenyl) glutaronitrile (1.023 g, 5 mmol) in 2.5 ml of
DMSO. The reaction mixture was incubated at 30ºC with shaking
at 200 rpm and monitored by chiral HPLC to determine the
conversion and ee values.
After the substrate 1a was almost converted to (S)-2a, the
reaction mixture using mutant P194A/I201A/F202V was
centrifuged (7000 g, 10 min). The supernatant was extracted
with ethyl acetate (50 mL ×2), and the aqueous phase was
acidified with 6.0 M HCl to pH 1-2 and extracted with ethyl
acetate (50 mL ×2). After removal of the solvent, (S)-2a was
obtain as a white solid (1.018 g, 91%). 1H NMR (600MHz ,DMSO-
d6) δ = 7.42 - 7.35 (m, 4 H), 3.41 - 3.37 (m, 1 H), 2.94 - 2.84 (m,
2 H), 2.74 - 2.60 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (150MHz ,DMSO-d6) δ =
172.59, 140.97, 132.26, 129.87, 128.91, 119.51, 39.35, 37.78,
23.69.
13 S. M. Hoy, CNS Drugs, 2016, 30, 761-772.
14 Q. W. Lang, G. X. Gu, Y. T. Cheng, Q. Yin and X. M. Zhang, ACS
Catal., 2018, 8, 4824-4828.
15 J. J. Ma, J. H. Lin, L. F. Zhao, K. Harms, M. Marsch, X. L. Xie and
E. Meggers, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 11193-11197.
16 R. Kaur and S. K. Pandey, Tetrahedron Lett., 2017, 58, 4333-
4335.
17 M. Hatano, K. Yamakawa and K. Ishihara, ACS Catal., 2017, 7,
6686-6690.
18 T. Tsubogo, H. Oyamada and S. Kobayashi, Nature, 2015, 520,
329-332.
19 I. J. Montoya-Balbás, B. Valentín-Guevara, E. López-Mendoza,
I. Linzaga-Elizalde, M. Ordoñez and P. Román-Bravo,
Molecules, 2015, 20, 22028-22043.
20 X.-T. Guo, J. Shen, F. Sha and X.-Y. Wu, Synthesis, 2015, 47,
2063-2072.
21 E. Tovar-Gudiño, R. Morales-Nava and M. o Fernández-
Zertuche, Can. J. Chem., 2014, 92, 45-48.
22 R. N. Patel, ACS Catal., 2011, 1, 1056-1074.
23 R. A. Sheldon and P. C. Pereira, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46,
2678-2691.
24 U. T. Bornscheuer, G. W. Huisman, R. J. Kazlauskas, S. Lutz, J.
C. Moore and K. Robins, Nature, 2012, 485, 185-194.
25 M. T. Reetz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 12480-12496.
26 J. H. Jung, D. H. Yoon, P. Kang, W. K. Lee, H. Eum and H. J. Ha,
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 3635-3641.
27 R. C. Zheng, T. Z. Wang, D. J. Fu, A. P. Li, X. J. Li and Y. G. Zheng,
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2013, 97, 4839-4847.
28 C. S. Fuchs, J. E. Farnberger, G. Steinkellner, J. H. Sattler, M.
Pickl, R. C. Simon, F. Zepeck, K. Gruber and W. Kroutil, Adv.
Synth. Catal., 2018, 360, 768-778.
29 E. Brenna, M. Crotti, F. G. Gatti, D. Monti, F. Parmeggiani, R.
W. Powell, S. Santangelo and J. D. Stewart, Adv. Synth. Catal.,
2015, 357, 1849-1860.
30 S. Debarge, P. McDaid, P. O'Neill, J. Frahill, J. W. Wong, D. Carr,
A. Burrell, S. Davies, M. Karmilowicz and J. Steflik, Org. Process
Res. Dev., 2014, 18, 109-121.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Acknowledgements
The work was financially supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21572261), Youth
Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of
Sciences (Grant No. 2016166) and Tianjin Municipal Science and
Technology
Commission
(15PTGCCX00060
and
15PTCYSY00020). We thank Ms. Jie. Zhang for technical support
with protein purification.
6 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins