Microwave-Assisted Generation of Lanthanide(II) Halides in THF
SHORT COMMUNICATION
bar, located inside a glove box and fitted with a septum. Triethyl-
amine (approximately 3 equiv.) and water (approximately 4 equiv.)
were then added to the SmI2 solution by syringe. While vigorously
stirring, 2-heptanone diluted in THF (0.07 ) was added dropwise
until the dark blue solution turned colourless with the formation
of a white suspension, and the volume of added 2-heptanone was
read. The final calculation of [SmI2] could then be carried out using
the balanced formula [Equation (1)].
sions of up to at least 0.4 (Table 1). These results also
indicate that suspensions of either YbI2, SmI2 or SmBr2 can
be used as single-electron-transfer reagents in the instan-
taneous reduction of, for example, ketones by the amine/
water method.
Titration of EuI2
Titrations of EuI2 in THF were unsuccessful. Apparently,
the oxidation potential of Eu2ϩ is too low to mediate the
reduction of, for example, 2-heptanone in the presence of
triethylamine and water.
General GC-Based Determination of the Active Amount of SmBr2,
SmI2 and YbI2: A solution or suspension of SmI2 (5 mL) was added
to a test tube containing a magnetic stirrer bar, located inside a
glove box and fitted with a septum. Triethylamine (approximately
3 equiv.) and water (approximately 4 equiv.) were added into the
SmI2 solution by syringe. While vigorously stirring, excess 2-hep-
tanone diluted in THF (0.070 ) (i.e. more ketone than would be
possible to reduce with the estimated amount of the prepared lan-
thanide reagent) was added in one portion, which caused the solu-
tion to decolourise. With the use of gas chromatography, the
amount of consumed 2-heptanone was determined with an internal
standard added, e.g. 1-hexanol. The final calculation of [SmI2]
could then be performed according to Equation (1).
Conclusion
There should be numerous reduction reactions for which
the oxidation potential of SmI2 is nonideal, and in which
other lanthanide halides and also samarium with different
counter anions may play a crucial role. We believe that the
exploration of the chemistry mediated by these reagents is
dependent on simple methods for their preparation. Due to
the very low oxidation potential of EuI2 its synthetic utility
as a single-electron-reagent is somewhat limited, neverthe-
less its use may increase once this rapid and reliable method
of preparation is known. Microwave-assisted generation of
LnX2 from metal (Ln ϭ Sm, Yb and Eu) and halides (I2
and Br2) appear to be a viable alternative to the recently
reported fast sonication technique.[20] Preliminary results
indicate that LnX2 reagents can be prepared in situ in the
presence of reducible substrates. In an ideal situation that
would allow the use of less solvent as the actual concen-
tration of LnX2 could be kept low during the reaction.
The direct method of determining the concentration of
LnX2 solutions by utilizing the instantaneous reaction be-
tween, for example, SmI2 and ketones in the presence of
excess amine and water has proven to be a very powerful
and reliable method. The major advantage with this method
is that the determination is made only on the active single-
electron-donor species, i.e. LnX2. Previously reported meth-
ods also include inactive species such as LnX3 and therefore
tend to overestimate the concentration of the reagent. This
simple method of determining accurate concentrations of
LnX2 will therefore become useful among those working
with single-electron-transfer reagents.
Supporting Information Available (see also the footnote on the first
page of this article): UV/Vis spectra of THF solutions of SmI2,
YbI2, SmBr2 and EuI2. Further experimental details are also in-
cluded.
Acknowledgments
˚
We thank the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet) for fin-
ancial support, and Knut and Alice Wallenberg for funding of the
glove box. We also thank Personal Chemistry AB and Astra-
Zeneca R&D in Mölndal for the microwave equipment.
[1]
G. A. Molander, Radicals in Organic Synthesis (Eds.: P. Re-
naud, M. P. Sibi), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001, vol. 1, pp.
153Ϫ182.
[2]
P. G. Steel, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 2727Ϫ2751.
[3]
B. K. Banik, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2431Ϫ2444.
[4]
G. A. Molander, Organic Reactions (Ed.: L. A. Paquette), John
Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1994, vol. 46, pp. 211Ϫ367.
M. Shabangi, J. M. Sealy, J. R. Fuchs, R. A. Flowers II, Tetra-
[5]
hedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4429Ϫ4432.
[6]
A. Krief, A.-M. Laval, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 745Ϫ777.
[7]
G. A. Molander, Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 29Ϫ68.
W. J. Evans, D. K. Drummond, H. Zhang, J. L. Atwood, Inorg.
[8]
Chem. 1988, 27, 575Ϫ579.
[9]
Experimental Section
E. Prasad, B. W. Knettle, R. A. Flowers II, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 14663Ϫ14667.
[10]
´
F. Helion, M.-I. Lannou, J.-L. Namy, Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
Generation of SmI2: Samarium powder (113 mg, 0.75 mmol, 1.5
equiv.) and iodine (127 mg, 0.5 mmol, 1 equiv.) were weighed and
diluted with dried THF (5 mL) in a microwave-approved vessel
inside a glove box under nitrogen. A magnetic stirrer bar was ad-
ded, and the vessel was sealed. The mixture was inserted in the
microwave oven and irradiated at 180 °C for 5 min to yield a dark
blue solution of SmI2 in THF, which could be used without
further purification.
44, 5507Ϫ5510.
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
A. Ogawa, S. Ohya, Y. Sumino, N. Sonoda, T. Hirao, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1997, 38, 9017Ϫ9018.
W. J. Evans, P. S. Workman, N. T. Allen, Organic Lett. 2003,
5, 2041Ϫ2042.
W. J. Evans, N. T. Allen, J. W. Ziller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 11749Ϫ11750.
P. Lidström, J. Tierney, B. Wathey, J. Westman, Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 9225Ϫ9283.
M. Larhed, C. Moberg, A. Hallberg, Acc. Chem. Res. 2002,
35, 717Ϫ727.
Volumetric Titration of SmI2: SmI2 was centrifuged, and the solu-
tion (5 mL) was added to a test tube containing a magnetic stirrer
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 3020Ϫ3024
2004 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3023