A R T I C L E S
Yamada et al.
7
suggest that O2 formation is preceded by rate-limiting uni-
molecular activation of the complex ion, perhaps by internal
electronic rearrangement. A novel reaction mechanism is
proposed that features formation of a bipyridyl ligand π-cation
with reaction of solvent at that site; this mechanism may have
precedents in water oxidation and other ligand reactions reported
electrolysis cell attached to a potentiostat as previously described. To
conserve the dimeric coordination complex, the electrolysis cell was
modified for experiments measuring the temperature dependence of
5,5} decay. In this case, a thin 5.9 mm i.d. porous Vycor tube
Bioanalytical Systems) filled with carbon fibers was used in place of
the larger standard 8.2 mm i.d. electrode, allowing preparation of the
5,5} ion at a slower flow rate. The effluent from the cell was run
{
(
{
1
5-22
for a broader range of ruthenium bipyridyl complexes.
directly into a 1 mm or 2 mm optical cell and the UV-vis spectra
were repetitively recorded following stoppage of the flow. Oxygen
evolution experiments were conducted using reaction chambers com-
posed of 6-10 mL reservoirs encased within outer glass chambers
through which thermostated fluids could be circulated from a constant-
temperature bath. Access to the reaction chamber was provided by two
2 mm bore capillary glass tubes through which purging gases or reagents
could be introduced and a larger ∼12 mm tube whose diameter was
appropriate to receive a YSI model 5331 oxygen probe. This probe
was fitted with O-rings to achieve an airtight seal within the tube. Rates
of O2 evolution were made on continuously stirred argon-purged
samples with the probe located within the gaseous headspace region
of the reaction chamber. In a typical run, reaction was initiated by
syringe addition of 0.25 mL of 0.30 M Ce4 through a septum to 6.75
mL of acidic solutions containing 0.10 mM of the {3,3} ion, and the
response of the electrode was recorded as a function of time using a
strip-chart recorder. The electrode was calibrated by measuring the
amplitude of the pen deflection when air originally present in the
chamber was replaced by Ar. For experiments measuring the mass
Experimental Section
Materials. The µ-oxo-bridged dimeric ruthenium coordination
4
+
complex cis,cis-[(bpy)
2
Ru(OH
2
)]
2
O
was prepared as the perchlorate
1
salt following well-established synthetic procedures and was recrystal-
lized repeatedly to remove minor impurities. The final product was
7
isolated as fine dark blue crystalline needles that were ∼1 mm in length.
Concentrations of reagent solutions of the {3,3} ion were determined
4
-1
-1 7
spectrophotometrically using ꢀ636 ) 2.2 × 10 M cm . Purity was
established by spectroscopically monitoring one-electron oxidative
titrations of the {3,3} ion in 0.5-1.0 M trifluoromethanesulfonic (triflic)
acid with Ce . These reactions occurred with [Ce4+]/[{3,3}] stoi-
chiometries of 1.0. Five sharp isosbestic points (at 533, 404, 340, 294,
and 261 nm) were observed in the optical spectra over the course of
the titration, and changes in the absorption maxima of {3,3} at 636
nm and {3,4} at 448 nm were proportional to the amount of added
4+
+
4+
Ce . The visible isosbestic points are particularly good criteria of purity
because the impurities formed during preparation absorb strongly in
these regions. Reagent solutions of the complex containing 18O-
isotopically enriched aqua ligands were prepared by incubating the {3,3}
distributions of gases formed in the reaction chamber, the O electrode
2
was replaced by a Lucite plug in which was mounted one end of a
1
8
4+
ion (typically, at 7.5 mM) in 97.2% [ O]-H
been added sufficient triflic anhydride to give 0.5 M triflic acid. After
90 min at room temperature, the complex was oxidatively titrated to
the {3,4} state with a slight stoichiometric excess (∼5%) of concentrated
Ce . Under these conditions, the reaction half-times for water exchange
at the cis-aqua position were t1/2 ≈ 2 min for the {3,3} ion and t1/2
0 d for the {3,4} ion; exchange of the bridging µ-oxo atom with
2
O (ICON) to which had
glass capillary column. In a typical run, 0.9 mL of 0.25 M Ce was
added to 8.1 mL of 0.5 M triflic acid containing 0.04-0.8 mM of the
18
∼
O-isotopically enriched complex ion prepared as described in the
preceding section. Headspace gases were continuously withdrawn at
∼1 mL/min into a VG7070EHF double-focusing mass spectrometer
operated in the EI mode at 70 eV with a 10-50 m/z continuum scan.
The purging gas used in these experiments was He. A 10 mL syringe
containing He was attached via a Hamilton three-way valve to one of
the sidearms of the reaction cell. During runs, the valve was opened to
the reaction chamber, allowing gases withdrawn by the mass spec-
trometer to be replaced by He, thereby maintaining normal atmospheric
pressure in the chamber. Ceric ion was introduced via syringe transfer
through the other sidearm of the reaction cell to initiate the reaction.
Resonance Raman (RR) spectra were acquired at room temperature by
using 90° scattered light from sealed samples in glass capillaries. The
Raman spectrometer, which uses a McPherson 2061 spectrograph
coupled to a Princeton Instruments LN-1100PB CCD detector, has been
4+
>
1
8
8
O did not occur in either oxidation state.7,13
The O-
18
solvent H
2
isotopically enriched {3,4} ions were kept in H
2
18O until immediately
before their use in isotope tracer experiments, which was always within
a few hours of their preparation. The final enrichments were calculated
1
6
by assuming that the O atoms introduced upon addition of triflic
16
2
anhydride equilibrated with solvent H O during the incubation period
and that the isotopic composition at the cis-aqua positions were identical
to the final solvent composition. As calculated, the enrichments for
these preparations were 89-91%. Solutions of the analogous complex
18
18
18 4+
2 2
)] O ,
containing O in the bridging position, that is, [(bpy)
2
Ru( OH
in O-enriched H O using the same
procedures as normal {3,3} ion. In this case, however, the limited
availability of H
18O precluded purification of the product. Triflic acid
99% CF SO H, Alfa Aesar) was vacuum-distilled and stored at 10 °C
18
23,24
were prepared from cis-Ru(bpy)
2
Cl
2
2
previously described.
1
3
Data Analyses. To avoid complications associated with the slow
secondary conversion of {4,4} to {3,4}, decay of the {5,5} ion was
analyzed from changes in optical absorption at wavelengths corre-
sponding to the isosbestic points of the {4,4} and {3,4} ions (470 nm
2
(
3
3
as 0.5-1.0 M aqueous solutions. Other chemicals were reagent grade
and used as received from commercial suppliers; water was purified
using a Milli-Q ion exchange/reverse osmosis system.
Analytical Methods. The kinetics of decay of the {5,5} ion were
monitored spectrophotometrically by using a computer-interfaced HP
in 0.5 M triflic acid/H
these wavelengths, the reactions exhibited simple first-order behavior
over 3 to 4 half-lives. Determination of O evolution rates required
2 2
O and 468 nm in 0.5 M triflic acid/D O). At
2
knowledge of the headspace volume in the reaction cell, which was
estimated from the difference in weight of the cell when empty and
8
452A diode array instrument. For most experiments, the {5,5} ion
was prepared electrochemically by using a carbon fiber columnar flow
filled with H
were estimated to introduce a 10-15% uncertainty in the O
which were calculated in units of nmol O formed/s. Prior studies had
established that these rates were linearly dependent upon [{5,5}].
The turnover number (kcat), which is a first-order rate constant, was
2
O. Variations in the effective volume for a given run
2
rates,
(
15) Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1975, 72, 2858-2862.
16) Nord, G.; Pedersen, B.; Bjergbakke, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1913-
2
(
7
,9
1
919.
(17) Ghosh, P. K.; Brunschwig, B. S.; Chou, M.; Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 4772-4783.
2
determined by dividing the O formation rate by the amount of catalyst
(
18) Ledney, M.; Dutta, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7687-7695.
19) Berg-Brennan, C.; Subramanian, P.; Absi, M.; Stern, C.; Hupp, J. T. Inorg.
Chem. 1996, 35, 3719-3722.
(
present in the cell.
(
20) Zhang, H.-T.; Yan, S. G.; Subramanian, P.; Skeens-Jones, L. M.; Stern,
C.; Hupp, J. T. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1996, 414, 23-29.
21) Rollick, K. L.; Kochi, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 435-444.
22) Sag u¨ e´ s, J. A. A.; Gillard, R. D.; Lancashire, R. J.; Williams, P. A. J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. 1979, 193-198.
(23) Yamada, H.; Koike, T.; Hurst, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12775-
12780.
(24) Nakamura, N.; Mo e¨ nne-Loccoz, P.; Tanizawa, K.; Mure, M.; Suzuki, S.;
Klinman, J. P.; Sanders-Loehr, J. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 11479-11486.
(
(
9788 J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 126, NO. 31, 2004