Half-Sandwich Iridium Complexes
A R T I C L E S
environment; Table 1 shows the catalytic rates for 1-12 and
some simple precursor materials. The rate of oxygen evolution
is greater for 3 than for any of the analogous complexes 4-6.
Specifically, the tmeda complex 6 shows a slower rate than the
bipyridine complex 3. Kinetic studies suggest that tmeda is
quickly protonated and lost from the iridium center under the
catalytic conditions, giving essentially the same precursor as
the tris-aqua complex 11. Both 6 and 11 show a non-first-order
rate dependence on catalyst concentration (vide infra), and at 5
µM catalyst, the rates of oxygen evolution from 6 and 11 are
nearly identical (see Supporting Information).
The presence of potentially oxidizable, benzylic C-H bonds
on the Cp* ligand could provide a site for ligand modification
under the catalytic conditions. Oxidation of the Cp* ligand of
[
Cp*IrCl]
2
has been observed upon treatment with iodine(III)
reagents to give acetoxylated or hydroxylated products, depend-
17
Figure 2. Reaction mechanism postulated for iridium-catalyzed water
oxidation.
ing on the reaction conditions. To investigate whether a similar
ligand oxidation was taking place and was involved in either
catalyst decomposition or catalyst modification, we replaced the
Cp* ligand with Cp. In addition to removing the oxidizable
methyl groups, this change also affects the steric effect and
A plausible reaction mechanism for iridium-catalyzed water
oxidation, taking into account the mononuclear nature of our
catalysts, is shown in Figure 2. With a neutral chloro catalyst,
18
donor power of the ligand and exchange rates of the ancillary
-
such as 1 or 2, the Cl ligand is replaced by a molecule of H
2
O
19
ligands.
yielding a cationic Ir(III) aqua complex. This intermediate is
oxidized by cerium(IV) to an Ir(V) oxo complex, which acts as
active species in the formation of the O-O bond by reacting
with water. The oxidation of the resulting peroxo intermediate
In contrast to the wealth of literature on Cp* iridium
complexes, Cp complexes of iridium are much less common.
This difference can be ascribed to the lack of an easily accessible
and versatile starting material for their synthesis comparable to
yields the final O
coordination of H
step is characterized by means of DFT calculations.
2
product, and the catalyst is recovered by
O. In this paper, the key O-O bond formation
[
2 2
Cp*IrCl ] , a readily prepared, air-stable material. The analo-
2
gous CpIr dihalide materials are polymeric and not directly
accessible from hydrated iridium trichloride. Instead, for the
synthesis of 7 and 8 (Figure 4), we employed a procedure
Results and Discussion
2
0
developed by Heinekey and co-workers involving direct
Water Oxidation Catalyzed by 1-12. Complexes 3-12 were
synthesized and characterized (see Experimental Section and
Supporting Information), and no unusual features were encoun-
oxidation of CpIr(C with I to give [CpIrI . Employing
2
H
4
)
2
2
2 x
]
2
CpIr(C
2
H
4
)
2
instead of the more easily prepared CpIr(η -
cyclooctene)
2
allowed us to obtain exceptionally pure material
1
0
tered. In relation to our previously reported catalysts 1 and 2,
2
-6 replace the LX-type cyclometalated ligands with the L -
by sublimation of the bis-ethylene complex.
3
Looking at the Cp catalysts, we find that 7, the analogue of
Cp* complex 3, has a slower initial turnover rate. The rates of
oxygen evolution from nitrate 7 and hexafluorophosphate 8,
type bipyridine, phenanthroline, 2,2′-bipyrimidine, and tetram-
ethylethylenediamine (tmeda) ligands. These compounds were
isolated as their water-soluble chloride salts, having both one
inner- and one outer-sphere chloride. The crystal structures of
the new compounds 6 and 7 (Figure 3) confirm the expected
atom connectivity.
All the complexes in Figure 1 catalyze water oxidation with
cerium(IV) as primary oxidant. The initial, maximal rate of
oxygen evolution is affected by changes in coordination
21
show essentially similar rates of oxygen evolution. The nitrate
salt 7 has excellent solubility in water, and this complex was
(
15) (a) Kuznetsov, A. E.; Geletii, Y. V.; Hill, C. L.; Morokuma, K.;
Musaev, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6844–6854. (b) Geletii,
Y. V.; Huang, Z.; Hou, Y.; Musaev, D. G.; Lian, T.; Hill, C. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7522–7523. (c) Geletii, Y. V.; Besson, C.; Hou,
Y.; Yin, Q.; Musaev, D. G.; Qui n˜ onero, D.; Cao, R.; Hardcastle, K. I.;
Proust, A.; K o¨ gerler, P.; Hill, C. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
17360–17370. (d) Geletii, Y. V.; Botar, B.; K o¨ gerler, P.; Hillesheim,
D. A.; Musaev, D. G.; Hill, C. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
3896–3899. (e) Sartorel, A.; Miro, P.; Salvadori, E.; Romain, S.;
Carraro, M.; Scorrano, G.; Di Valentin, M.; Llobet, A.; Bo, C.;
Bonchio, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16051–16053.
(
13) (a) Kohl, S. W.; Weiner, L.; Schwartsburd, L.; Konstantinovski, L.;
Shimon, L. J. W.; Ben-David, Y.; Iron, M. A.; Milstein, D. Science
2
009, 324, 74–77. (b) Li, J.; Shiota, Y.; Yoshizawa, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 13584–13585. (c) Yang, X.; Hall, M. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2010, 132, 120–130. (d) Chen, Z. F.; Concepcion, J. J.; Hu, X. Q.;
Yang, W. T.; Hoertz, P. G.; Meyer, T. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
(16) (a) Lundberg, M.; Blomberg, M. R. A.; Siegbahn, P. E. M. Inorg.
Chem. 2004, 43, 264–274. (b) Siegbahn, P. E. M. Inorg. Chem. 2008,
47, 1779–1786. (c) Siegbahn, P. E. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42,
1871–1880. (d) Siegbahn, P. E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
18238–18239. (e) Sproviero, E. M.; Gasc o´ n, J. A.; McEvoy, J. P.;
Brudvig, G. W.; Batista, V. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6728–
6730.
2
010, 107, 7225–7229. (e) Wang, L.-P.; Wu, Q.; Voorhis, T. V. Inorg.
Chem. 2010, 49, 4543–4553.
(
14) (a) Bartolotti, L. J.; Pedersen, L. G.; Meyer, T. J. Int. J. Quantum
Chem. 2001, 83, 143–149. (b) Yang, X.; Baik, M.-H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 13222–13223. (c) Yang, X.; Baik, M.-H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 7476–7485. (d) Yang, X.; Baik, M.-H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16231–16240. (e) Romain, S.; Bozoglian, F.;
Sala, X.; Llobet, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2768–2769. (f)
Bozoglian, F.; Romain, S.; Ertem, M. Z.; Todorova, T. K.; Sens, C.;
Mola, J.; Rodriguez, M.; Romero, I.; Benet-Buchholz, J.; Fontrodona,
X.; Cramer, C. J.; Gagliardi, L.; Llobet, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
(17) Park-Gehrke, L. S.; Freudenthal, J.; Kaminsky, W.; DiPasquale, A. G.;
Mayer, J. M. Dalton Trans. 2009, 1972–1983.
(18) Fendrick, C. M.; Schertz, L. D.; Mintz, E. A.; Marks, T. J. Inorg.
Synth. 1992, 29, 193–238.
(19) (a) Wang, D.; Angelici, R. J. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 1321–1331. (b)
Hughes, R. P.; Lindner, D. C.; Liable-Sands, L. M.; Rheingold, A. L.
Organometallics 2001, 20, 363–366.
1
31, 15176–15187. (g) Batista, E. R.; Martin, R. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 7224–7225. (h) Concepcion, J. J.; Tsai, M.-K.;
Muckerman, J. T.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1545–
(20) Heinekey, D. M.; Millar, J. M.; Koetzle, T. F.; Payne, N. G.; Zilm,
K. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 909–919.
1
557.
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 132, NO. 45, 2010 16019