Macromolecules, Vol. 36, No. 11, 2003
Communications to the Editor 3795
succinonitrile (0.14 mmol, 69% yield), a dimer of the
AIBN-derived radical, together with the recovered dim-
ethyl ditelluride (0.18 mmol, 90%). The rather low
coupling efficiency of the AIBN-derived radical with
dimethyl ditelluride is not surprising because ca. 40%
of the radical generated from AIBN dimerizes in solvent
The existence of an organotellanyl end group in the
polySt and polyBA prepared by method C was also
1
confirmed directly by H NMR spectroscopy and by
2
MALDI TOF MS and H NMR spectra after treatment
of the polymer with tributyltin hydride or deuteride (see
1
Supporting Information). While the H NMR spectra
8
cages before diffusing to bulk solutions. The phenyl-
were very similar to those prepared by method A,
MALDI TOF MS analysis revealed the existence of a
series of new peaks. The newly observed peaks also
increased one mass number upon the deuterium-label-
ing experiment. Therefore, these peaks were also de-
rived from dormant species possessing organotellanyl
end groups; however, the origin of the new peaks is
unclear at the present time.
tellanyl-substituted 1b could also be prepared in 8%
yield by using commercially available diphenyl ditellu-
ride instead of dimethyl ditelluride. The 1/ditelluride
ratio varied upon changing the starting AIBN/ditellu-
ride ratio, but no conditions were found where all the
ditelluride was converted to 1 (see Supporting Informa-
tion).
In summary, we have developed a new initiating
system for TERP using shelf stable diazo compounds
and ditellurides. The obtained polymer possesses an
organotellanyl end group, which would be useful for
polymer-end manipulations and for block copolymer
The in situ generated 1 also initiated polymerization
of St, BA, and MMA, but the efficiency and controllabil-
ity varied depending on the vinyl monomers (Table 1,
entries 5-10). Phenyltellanyl-substituted initiator 1b
generally promoted the polymerization much faster than
3
synthesis. Since methods B and C do not require
1
a , while the controllability of the molecular weight
distribution was slightly less efficient with 1b than with
a . Because 1b has a lower bond dissociation energy
purification and handling of air-sensitive organotellu-
rium compounds, these new methods are especially
1
1
3
suitable for the practical use of TERP. Method C is
the most convenient and is useful for the polymerization
of styrene and acrylate derivatives because of the
simplicity of the reaction procedure with a high level of
controllability of the resulting polymers, while method
B should be useful for the controlled polymerization of
methacrylate derivatives. Method A using purified
initiators, however, is certainly the choice to obtain the
living polymers with the highest level of controllability
for both molecular weight and polydispersity.
than 1a (105 and 120 kJ /mol by density functional
9
theory calculations, respectively ), the observed trend
is due to the faster radical generation from the phenyl-
tellanyl-substituted initiator or dormant species than
from the methyltellanyl-substituted ones. PolyMMA
with the anticipated molecular weight and low polydis-
persity (PDI < 1.26) was successfully obtained, indicat-
ing that polymerization is initiated exclusively by 1
entries 9 and 10).10 Because the reaction mixture
(
contained the unreacted ditelluride, further addition of
the ditelluride was unnecessary. As the remaining
ditelluride also shifts the equilibrium constant to the
dormant organotellurium species from the polymer-end
radicals, the rate of the polymerization using method
B was considerably slower compared to that using
method A, especially in the polySt and polyBA synthe-
ses.11 Styrene was slowly polymerized upon prolonged
heating at 80-90 °C with low polydispersity (PDI )
Ack n ow led gm en t. This work was partly supported
by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from J apan
Society for the Promotion of Science.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Experimental sec-
tion. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
at http://pubs.acs.org.
1
.20) (entries 5 and 6), while polymerization of BA was
Refer en ces a n d Notes
not complete within a period of time for practical use
(
1) Handbook of Radical Polymerization; Matyjaszewski, K.,
Davis, T. P., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2002.
Controlled/ Living Radical Polymerization. Progress in ATRP,
NMP, and RAFT; Matyjaszewski, K., Ed.; American Chemi-
cal Society: Washington, DC, 2000. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101
(entries 7 and 8).
Polymerization by heating a mixture of AIBN, ditel-
luride, and vinyl monomer (method C) was especially
effective for the controlled polymerization of BA (entries
(
12).
2) (a) Hawker, C. J .; Bosman, A. W.; Harth, E. Chem. Rev.
001, 101, 3661. (b) Matyjaszewski, K.; Xia, J . Chem. Rev.
1
3-15). The results could be attributed to the decrease
(
of ditelluride in the reaction mixture due to the decrease
of homocoupling of the AIBN-derived radical, which now
reacted preferentially with BA followed by the ditellu-
ride to form dormant species. The polymerization was
almost completed within 24 h at 100 °C by changing
the AIBN/ditelluride ratio (entry 14) or by using diphe-
nyl ditelluride (entry 15), and the desired polyBA formed
with low polydispersity (PDI < 1.24). PolySt with low
polydispersity was also formed by method C when the
polymerization was carried out below 90 °C with the
combination of dimethyl ditelluride (entry 11),12 whereas
polymerization using diphenyl ditelluride or a higher
temperature resulted in the formation of polySt of high
polydispersity (PDI > 1.4). Polymerization of MMA
could not be controlled even in the presence of an excess
of ditelluride (entry 16). As the polymerization pro-
ceeded very rapidly with the formation of high-molec-
ular-weight polyMMA, the result must be attributed to
the preferential occurrence of the conventional AIBN-
initiated free radical polymerization.
2
2001, 101, 2921. Kamigaito, M.; Ando, T.; Sawamoto, M.
Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3689. (c) Destarac, M.; Charmot, D.;
Franck, X.; Zard, S. Z. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2000,
2
1, 1035. Chiefari, J .; Chong, Y. K.; Ercole, F.; Krstina, J .;
J effery, J .; Le, T. P. T.; Mayadunne, R. T. A.; Meijs, G. F.;
Moad, C. L.; Moad, G.; Rizzardo, E.; Thang, S. H. Macro-
molecules 1998, 31, 5559. (d) Ueda, N.; Kamigaito, M.;
Sawamoto, M. Polym. Prepr., J pn. 1996, 45, 1267. Gaynor,
S.; Wang, J .-S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromolecules 1995,
2
8, 8051.
(
3) (a) Yamago, S.; Iida, K.; Yoshida, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 2874. (b) Yamago, S.; Iida, K.; Yoshida, J . J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 13666.
(
4) Russell, G. A.; Tashtoush, H. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105,
1
398.
(
5) Takagi, K.; Soyano, A.; Kwon, T. S.; Kunisada, H.; Yuki, Y.
Polym. Bull. (Berlin) 1999, 43, 143.
(6) For our interest in radical reactions in organic synthesis,
see: Yamago, S.; Miyazoe, H.; Nakayama, T.; Miyoshi, M.;
Yoshida, J . Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 117. Yamago,
S.; Miyoshi, M.; Miyazoe, H.; Yoshida, J . Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 1407. Yamago, S.; Hashidume, M.; Yoshida,
J . Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 6805. Yamago, S.; Miyazoe, H.;