Third-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties of [AgCtCC6H5]n
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 40, No. 26, 2001 6795
2. Preparation of [AgS(t-Bu)]n. To a solution of 22.05 g (0.130
mol) of silver nitrate in 300 mL of acetonitrile, under nitrogen, was
added a solution of 49.6 mL (0.44 mol) of tert-butylthiol. The resulting
white precipitate was collected, washed thoroughly with 3 × 100 mL
methyl alcohol and 250 mL of acetonitrile, and dried under vacuum.
Yield: 22.99 g (90%).
We report herein a comparative study of the third-order
nonlinear optical properties of silver phenylacetylide and three
related compounds via the heterodyned optical Kerr effect
(OHD-OKE) measurements. [AgCtCC6H5]n (1) was found to
exhibit efficient third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility ø(3)
of 2.4 × 10-14 esu, and second hyperpolarizability γ of 9.07 ×
10-32 esu. These results are compared with those of two related
silver phenylacetylide compounds, namely, a double salt, (silver
phenylacetylide)‚(silver tert-butylthiolate) complex, [AgCt
CC6H5‚AgS(t-C4H9)]n (2), and a tetrameric cluster, triphen-
ylphosphine silver phenylacetylide, [(C6H5)3PAgCtCC6H5]4 (3),
as well as that of a closely related organic polymer, polyphen-
ylacetylene (4). These four compounds were chosen to represent
different types of phenylacetylide derivatives: 1 is an organo-
metallic polymer, 2 a polymeric double salt, 3 a discrete metal
cluster, and 4 an organic polymer. It was found that the third-
order optical nonlinearity was enhanced by the incorporation
of silver d electrons in the delocalized conjugated π system and
its magnitude is highly dependent upon the extent of the π
delocalization. Specifically, the relative magnitudes of ø(3) and
γ follow the order silver phenylacetylide polymer (1) > (silver
phenylacetylide)‚(silver tert-butylthiolate) double salt (2) >
polyphenylacetylene polymer (4) > (silver phenylacetylide)4-
(triphenylphosphine)4 cluster (3). This latter trend may be
attributed to the decreasing length of π conjugation. The signs
of ø(3) and γ, which are related to the response mechanisms,
were found to be solvent dependent.
Elemental anal. (%) Found (calcd): C, 24.62 (24.38); H, 4.69
1
(4.60); Ag, 54.70 (54.70). H NMR (CDCl3): 1.585 (s, -C(CH3)3).
3. Preparation of Silver Double Salt [(AgCtPh)(AgS(t-Bu))]n (2).
Silver tert-butyl thiolate (0.11 g, 0.558 mmol) was mixed with a 40
mL solution of 0.12 g (0.558 mmol) of silver phenylacetylide in 1:1
dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)/chloroform (CHCl3). The reaction mixture
turned silvery-pinkish-beige and was stirred vigorously under nitrogen
for 24 h. The precipitate was collected by filtration, washed with ethyl
alcohol, and dried under vacuum. Yield: 0.159 g (70.18%).
Elemental anal. (%) Found (calcd): C, 34.45 (35.49); H, 3.26
(3.47); Ag, 53.1 (53.13). 1H NMR (DMSO/CDCl3): 1.534 (s, 9H,
-C(CH3)3), 7.287-7.377 (m, 5H, -C6H5).
4. Preparation of Tetrameric Cluster [(Ph3 P)Ag(CtCPh)]4 (3).
Silver phenylacetylide (1.58 g, 7.56 mmol) was suspended in 200 mL
of dichloromethane in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask with stirring,
followed by the addition of 6.016 g (22.94 mmol) of triphenylphosphine.
Almost immediately the solid ingredients began to dissolve and the
solution became clear and turned pale yellow. The reaction mixture
was then stirred in the dark for 4 h. Slow evaporation in the dark
afforded colorless crystals, which were collected and recrystallized from
dichloromethane. The final product obtained was colorless glistening
rectangular columnar crystals with a sharp melting point of 176-178
°C. Yield: 2.86 g (80.3%).
Elemental anal. (%) Found (calcd): C, 66.39 (66.26); H, 4.63 (4.28).
5. Polymerization of Phenylacetylene (4). Phenylacetylene was
polymerized by means of molecular sieve NHSY-3 (SiO2‚Al2O3‚Na2O,
treated with oxalic acid and baked at 300 °C before use). Pulverized
NHSY-3 (0.7 g) was placed in a dried polymerization tube. The tube
was purged at least four times with pure nitrogen before the pres-
sure in the tube was kept at 0.7 mm Hg. Phenylacetylene (0.8 mL)
was then injected into the tube. Polymerization of phenylacetylene
occurred immediately and exothermally. The darkened molecular sieve
was removed, washed with absolute alcohol, dried, and placed in a
plastic container. Dropwise hydrofluoric acid was added into the con-
tainer to destroy and dissolve the molecular sieve. The resulting light
yellow liquid was neutralized with sodium hydroxide to pH 7. The
solution mixture was allowed to settle and then extracted with benzene.
A viscous liquid thus obtained was redissolved in a minimal amount
of benzene, followed by the addition of an excess amount of methanol
to precipitate out the product. The reaction mixture was then allowed
to stand overnight. The powdered polyphenylacetylene product was
obtained by centrifugation and dried under vacuum. Molecular weight
determination was performed with vapor pressure osmometry (KNAU-
ER D-1000) at 90 °C, with dimethylformamide (DMF) as solvent. Poly-
phenylacetylene with an average degree of polymerization 7 was chosen
in this study in order to compare with the silver phenylacetylide 1.
Experimental Section
Reagents. Phenylacetylene (ACROS, 98%) was purified by distil-
lation under nitrogen just prior to use. 2-Methyl-2-propanethiol (tert-
butyl mercaptan) (ACROS, 99%) was used as purchased.
Instrumentation. Micro FT-IR absorption spectra were recorded
with a Nicolet Magna 750 instrument. UV-vis spectra were taken with
a Shimadzu 2100 instrument. Elemental analysis was performed with
a CARLO ERBA model-1102 instrument. Silver content was deter-
mined with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry
1
(IRIS AP). H nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectra were
taken with ARX-400. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis
was done with TA DSC-2010 with a temperature rising rate of 10
°C/min. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were
done with Kratos XSAM 800 (U.K.).
Preparation and Characterization. 1. Preparation of [AgCt
CPh]n (1). (a) Two-Step Synthesis. In a 200 mL round-bottomed flask,
0.834 g (4.91 mmol) of silver nitrate was dissolved in 125 mL of
acetonitrile to form a colorless solution. NH3 gas was bubbled through
the solution, and white precipitates formed immediately. After about 1
h the NH3 gas was stopped and 0.65 mL (5.93 mmol) of phenylacetylene
was added. The color of the suspension turned to light brown. After
stirring for 30 h, the precipitate was collected by filtration, washed
with three portions of 50 mL of methyl alcohol, and dried under
vacuum. Yield: 0.943 g (91.8%).
Results and Discussion
Syntheses and Characterization. Four distinct types of
phenylacetylene derivatives and/or related compounds have been
prepared and studied in this paper. The first is the polymeric
silver phenylacetylide (1). Generally, 1 can be prepared from
the reaction of [Ag(NH3)2]+ with phenylacetylene as prescribed
in preparation 1(a) in the Experimental Section and in the
literature.13-16 We report here a one-step synthesis of 1 via a
homogeneous reaction of silver nitrate with phenylacetylene,
Elemental anal. (%) Found (calcd): C, 45.67 (45.98); H, 2.27
(2.41); Ag, 51.0 (51.61).
(b) One-Step Synthesis. Silver nitrate (1.0439 g, 6.15 mmol) was
disssolved in 70 mL of acetonitrile in a 100 mL Erlenmeyer flask
followed by successive additions of 2.03 mL (18.45 mmol) of
phenylacetylene and 2.56 mL (18.45 mmol) of triethylamine with
vigorous stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred for 48 h. The white
precipitate formed was collected by filtration, washed thoroughly with
3 × 50 mL of acetonitrile and 3 × 50 mL of methyl alcohol
successively, and dried under vacuum. Yield: 1.118 g (87.07%).
Elemental anal. (%) Found (calcd): C, 45.41 (45.90); H, 2.47
(13) Brasse, C.; Raithby, P. R.; Russell, C. A.; Wright, D. S. Organome-
tallics 1996, 15, 639-644.
(14) Osakada, K.; Takizawa, T.; Yamamoto, T. Organometallics 1995, 14,
3531-3538.
1
(2.41); Ag, 51.0 (51.61). H NMR (323 K, DMSO/CDCl3): 6.821-
7.455 (m, -C6H5).
(15) Yam, V. W.-W. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1997, 106 (1-3), 75-
84.
(16) Yam, V. W. W.; Lee, W. K.; Cheung, K. K. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 1996, 11, 2335-2339.
(12) Xu, H. Y.; Tang, B. Z. J. Macromol. Sci. 1999, 36, 1197-1207.