J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 119, No. 18, 8 November 2003
One-color polarization spectroscopy of OH
9467
mated above would be produced by scattering through an
angle of only Ϸ3°. Such small-angle scattering around the
forward direction is known to typically have very large cross
sections.43 In the absence of further evidence, we propose
that such velocity changing collisions are the primary pro-
cess responsible for the loss of the signal in these experi-
ments.
In conclusion, these experiments have been the first
stage in a program to develop polarization spectroscopy as a
probe of the dynamics of inelastic collisions. We have man-
aged to produce high signal-to-noise PS signals in a sealed
environment at low pressure, overcoming the problems of
scattering pump light and birefringence introduced by the
cell windows. The signals behave in the expected fashion
with varying pump power or sample number density. The
rate of loss of signal as a function of increasing collider
pressure is unexpectedly extremely rapid, a process we at-
tribute to predominately velocity changing collisions.
states with Ar, N , or He as collision partners are at most of
2
Ϫ10
3 Ϫ1
the order of 5ϫ10
cm s . We thus need to consider
what other processes could be removing the signal in such a
rapid fashion.
We can clearly state that whatever process removes the
signal is collisional in nature. Polarization spectroscopy will
be sensitive to purely elastic dephasing collisions as well as
collisional removal or depolarization. The magnitude of
these dephasing rates can be estimated from a combination
of line broadening measurements, sensitive to both dephas-
ing and total removal rates, and the literature total removal
rates. The line broadening parameters for OH (A–X) with
Ar, He, and N2 are consistent with combined dephasing
Ϫ10
Ϫ10
and removal rate constants of 5ϫ10 , 2ϫ10 , and 8
ϫ10
Ϫ10
3
Ϫ1
41
cm s respectively. These are very similar to the
total collisional removal rate constants measured in other
experiments and discussed earlier. This suggests that dephas-
ing collisions are not a dominant influence on the observed
degradation of our PS signal.
Further collisional processes that could potentially de-
grade the signal are those that result in a velocity change.42
The physical principle is that molecules that have undergone
a velocity changing collision will emit spatially out of phase
with their counterparts that have not, and the resulting inter-
ference will be destructive and not generate a signal field.
The critical parameters are the wave vector for the signal
field generated in the nonlinear process, the velocity change
caused by collision, and the time scale between collisions
and photon interactions. The wavelength of the pump
and probe lasers is approximately 308 nm: from this, we find
that the wave vector in these experiments is of the order
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the EPSRC for equipment funding. H.J.C.
thanks the EPSRC for a Ph.D. studentship. M.L.C. thanks the
Royal Society of Edinburgh for a BP research fellowship.
1
P. J. Dagdigian, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48, 95 ͑1997͒.
K. G. McKendrick, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 94, 1921 ͑1998͒.
A. J. Orr-Ewing and R. N. Zare, in Chemical Dynamics and Kinetics of
2
3
Small Radicals, edited by A. Wagner and K. Liu, Advances in Physical
Chemistry Series ͑World Scientific, Singapore, 1995͒.
J. I. Cline, K. T. Lorenz, E. A. Wade, J. W. Barr, and D. W. Chandler, J.
4
Chem. Phys. 115, 6277 ͑2001͒.
K. T. Lorenz, D. W. Chandler, J. W. Barr, W. Chen, G. L. Barnes, and J. I.
7
Ϫ1
5
͉
k
͉
Ϸ2ϫ10 m . The most probable speed for OH at this
Ϫ1
temperature is Ϸ540 m s . The time scale of the experiment
is Ϸ5 ns ͑the laser pulse length͒ during which three separate
interactions ͑two with the pump beam and one with the
probe beam͒ must occur for a signal to be generated. Con-
sider two molecules with the same initial velocity, both in-
teracting with the same beam, at the same instant. The first of
these molecules undergoes no collisions until its next optical
interaction. The other molecule undergoes an immediate
elastic collision, which changes its velocity projection on the
beam direction. After 5 ns it also undergoes its next optical
interaction: however, it is now no longer in phase with its
counterpart. The time between interactions and the change in
velocity combine to result in a phase shift of (k•⌬v)⌬t be-
tween these formerly identical molecules. If we assume a
time of 5 ns and the above wave vector, we find that a ve-
Cline, Science 293, 2063 ͑2001͒.
N. A. Jackson, C. J. Randall, and K. G. McKendrick, Chem. Phys. 233, 45
6
͑
1998͒.
7
C. J. Randall, C. Murray, and K. G. McKendrick, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 2, 461 ͑2000͒.
G. Richmond, M. L. Costen, and K. G. McKendrick ͑unpublished͒.
C. Murray, C. J. Randall, and K. G. McKendrick, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 2, 5533 ͑2000͒.
N. Furio, A. Ali, and P. J. Dagdigian, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 3860 ͑1986͒.
G. Jihua, A. Ali, and P. J. Dagdigian, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 7098 ͑1986͒.
C. Wieman and T. W. H a¨ nsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1170 ͑1976͒.
K. Nyholm, Opt. Commun. 111, 66 ͑1994͒.
K. Nyholm, R. Fritzon, and M. Ald e´ n, Opt. Lett. 18, 1672 ͑1993͒.
A. A. Suvernev, A. Dreizler, T. Dreier, and J. Wolfrum, Appl. Phys. B:
Lasers Opt. 61, 421 ͑1995͒.
K. Nyholm, M. Kaivola, and C. G. Aminoff, Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt.
8
9
10
11
1
1
2
3
14
15
16
6
0, 5 ͑1995͒.
17
B. L o¨ fstedt and M. Ald e´ n, Opt. Commun. 124, 251 ͑1996͒.
T. B. Settersten, R. L. Farrow, and J. A. Gray, Chem. Phys. Lett. 369, 584
͑2003͒.
A. Dreizler, R. Tadday, A. A. Suvernev, M. Himmelhaus, T. Dreier, and P.
Foggi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 240, 315 ͑1995͒.
R. Tadday, A. A. Suvernev, T. Dreier, and J. Wolfrum, Chem. Phys. Lett.
268, 117 ͑1997͒.
T. A. Reichardt, F. Di Teodoro, R. L. Farrow, S. Roy, and R. P. Lucht, J.
Chem. Phys. 113, 2263 ͑2000͒.
18
Ϫ1
locity shift of 31 ms is sufficient to generate a phase shift
19
of radians. This would result in the contributions to the
signal electric field from these two molecules canceling one
another. Thus relatively modest changes in velocity during
the experimental time scale are sufficient to remove the PS
signal. It should be emphasized that PS is sensitive to the
velocity projection along the beam propagation direction.
Collisions do not need to change the speed of the OH, which
would require hard, repulsive wall interactions. Long-range,
purely elastic interactions sampling the attractive part of the
potential, which merely alter the direction of motion, would
be sufficient. The representative 31-msϪ1 velocity shift esti-
20
2
2
1
2
R. J. Wilson and A. J. McCaffery, Chem. Phys. Lett. 261, 195 ͑1996͒.
D. A. V. Kliner and R. L. Farrow, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 412 ͑1999͒.
K. M. Hickson, C. M. Sadowski, and I. W. M. Smith, J. Phys. Chem. A
23
24
106, 8442 ͑2002͒.
25
K. M. Hickson, C. M. Sadowski, and I. W. M. Smith, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 4, 5613 ͑2002͒.
P. Andresen, N. Aristov, V. Beushausen, D. H a¨ usler, and H. W. L u¨ lf, J.
26
Chem. Phys. 95, 5763 ͑1991͒.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
60.36.178.25 On: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 00:19:35
1