side reactions the method of choice was the use of cobalt(II
)
naphthenate with acetic anhydride.11
The oligonucleotides were then exposed to the BDM (3)
under a variety of conditions and the reaction initially followed
at high concentration by HPLC to ensure the reaction was
occurring. The optimal conditions were found to be similar to
9
those reported by Hill et al. except that the reaction time and
number of equivalents of dienophile required could be reduced
by use of a copper(II) nitrate catalyst. Equimolar amounts of
furan oligo and BDM could be used to give complete reaction
with the catalyst. It also reduced the reaction time to less than
one hour. Both oligonucleotides gave the same result which
proved that the reaction was not a sequence dependent process.
Fig. 1 shows the cycloaddition as followed by HPLC using a 25
mM phosphate buffer at pH 5.5 and a three-fold excess of
BDM.
The reaction was then followed by SERRS at a concentration
lower than could be detected by a UV-HPLC system to evaluate
the sensitivity. In this case a 1+1 ratio of BDM to furan
oligonucleotide was used and no separation steps were
performed prior to analysis. Two methods of SERRS analysis
were investigated. One was the addition of 10 ml of the reaction
mixture to a silver film produced in situ from a silver nitrate/
PVA matrix and the other was the addition to citrate reduced
silver colloid. The PVA films have been used previously to give
good SERRS12 and in this case direct deposition of the mixture
followed by an aqueous wash after 10 min resulted in the
excellent spectra shown in Fig. 2. The cycloadduct showed
distinct differences from the BDM. The spectra were more
intense, new bands formed at 1204, 1263 and 1387 (azo stretch)
2
8
Fig. 2 SERRS of the cycloaddition from a silver film; 10 ml of a 6.3 3 10
2
1
cm and there were changes in relative intensity in several
other bands. The most obvious features to be used for detection
M solution of reaction mixture was used for each analysis.
2
1
are the shift in frequency of the band at 1399 to 1387 cm and
oligonucleotide influencing the surface adsorption properties of
the cycloadduct. The sensitivity of these oligonucleotides is
excellent, with the sensitivity of the PVA films being better than
that of the colloid. The exciting light is focused onto a small area
2
1
the change in intensity of the band at 1434 cm on production
of the cycloadduct. DFT on related compounds indicated that
these bands are predominantly stretching modes of the aromatic
rings with a contribution from the azo stretch.
2
of the film (350 objective d = 5 mm, ≈ 20 pm ) and we
When the silver colloidal suspension was used, direct
addition of the mixture to the suspension resulted in very poor
signals. However, as found previously for oligonucleotides,
addition of spermine allowed improved surface adsorption1
and resulted in similar spectra to those obtained from the PVA
films. Surprisingly the signal to noise ratio of the oligonucleo-
tide cycloadducts is significantly better than that of the
cycloadduct alone. We attribute this to the presence of the
estimate the actual number of moles under examination as being
in the region of 10 attomoles.
This is a totally new approach to biological labeling and
shows excellent promise in terms of selectivity, sensitivity and
simplicity. It is a convenient method of labeling oligonucleo-
tides in an aqueous environment to produce distinctive species
that do not need separation from starting materials prior to
analysis. This approach to labeling of biomolecules will be
effective for many other targets and a number of alternatives are
under investigation.
3,14
The authors wish to the BBSRC for the award of a David
Phillips Fellowship to D. G.
Notes and references
1
2
3
A. Castro and J. G. K. Williams, Anal. Chem., 1997, 69, 3915.
L. J. McBride and M. D. Oneill, Am. Lab., 1991, 23, 52 et seq.
Z. R. Zhu, J. Chao, H. Yu and A. S. Waggoner, Nucleic Acids Res.,
1
994, 22, 3418.
4
5
6
7
C. Wojczewski, K. Stolze and J. W. Engels, Synlett, 1999, 1667.
P. Hildebrandt and M. Stockburger, J. Phys. Chem., 1984, 88, 5935.
A. M. Stacy and R. P. Vanduyne, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1983, 102, 365.
C. H. Munro, W. E. Smith, M. Garner, J. Clarkson and P. C. White,
Langmuir, 1995, 11, 3712.
8
9
D. Graham, B. J. Mallinder and W. E. Smith, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2
000, 39, 1061.
K. W. Hill, J. Taunton-Rigby, J. D. Carter, E. Kropp, K. Vagle, W.
Pieken, D. P. C. McGee, G. M. Husar, M. Leuck, D. J. Anziano and D.
P. Sebesta, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 5352.
1
0 A. Grondin, D. C. Robson, W. E. Smith and D. Graham, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2, 2001, 2136.
1
1
1 J. E. T. Corrie, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1994, 2975.
2 M. Volkan, D. L. Stokes and V. D. Tuan, Appl. Spectrosc., 2000, 54,
1
842.
1
3 D. Graham, W. E. Smith, A. M. T. Linacre, C. H. Munro, N. D. Watson
and P. C. White, Anal. Chem., 1997, 69, 4703.
Fig. 1 HPLC trace of the cycloaddition. Peak 1 = furan oligo peak 2 =
oligo cycloadduct.
14 D. Graham, B. J. Mallinder and W. E. Smith, Biopolym. (Biospectrosc.),
2000, 57, 85.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 2100–2101
2101