6
60
D. V. Arsenov et al.
General method for the synthesis of retinoids. To a so-
lution of RA (152 mg, 0.5 mmole) and triethylamine (52 mg,
.51 mmole) in 3 ml of a THF – acetonitrile (1 : 2) mixture,
cooled to – 18°C, was added n-butylchloroformate (70 mg,
.51 mmole) and the reaction mixture was allowed to stand
at – 18°C for 20 min. Then the precipitate of triethylamine
hydrochloride was separated and the remaining mixed anhy-
dride solution was added to a solution of ethanolamine or
amino acid methylate (1 mmole) in 1 ml of methanol (also
cooled to – 18°C). The reaction mixture was kept for 20 min
at – 18°C and stirred for 2 h at room temperature (for tyro-
sine, the acylation was conducted for 1 h at – 18°C). Then
EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGICAL PART
The Ehrlich ascitic carcinoma was modeled by a conven-
tional method [17] in inbred C3H female mice weighing
0
20 – 24 g. The animals were kept on a standard laboratory
0
diet with free access to water. The tumor was taken from the
given strain mice and intraperitoneally implanted into test
6
mice (2 ´ 10 carcinoma cells). On the next day, the test mice
were randomized to form experimental groups, each of seven
mice, and the untreated control group of 15 mice.
Doxorubicin (3 mg/kg) and its complexes with retinoids
were injected into test mice according to an interrupted
schedule, on the second, fourth, and sixths day after tumor
implantation. The substances were injected into a lateral tail
vein with 0.2 ml of an isotonic NaCl solution. The composi-
tions of doxorubicin complexes are indicated in Table 2.
The results were evaluated on the eighth day in terms of
the tumor growth inhibition, ascites residue volume, and
number of tumor cells. The tumor growth inhibition, ex-
pressed as percentage relative to control, was calculated by
the formula [(control – test)/control] ´ 100%. The results
were statistically processed; activities of the standard drug
and the complexes tested were compared in terms of the Stu-
dent t-criterion.
1
0 ml of 0.5 M HCl cooled to – 5°C was added and the mix-
ture was extracted with 20 ml of diethyl ether. The ether ex-
tract was washed with 10 ml of water, dried over anhydrous
Na SO , and evaporated. The residue was dissolved in chlo-
2
4
roform (2 ml) and applied onto a chromatographic column
filled with alumina (alkaline, activity degree II according to
Brockman). The column was eluted with 10 ml of a chloro-
form – methanol (9 : 1, v/v) mixture. Finally, the eluate was
evaporated to obtain N-retinoyl derivatives of ethanolamine
or amino acid methylate (yield, 95%). TLC on silica gel re-
veals a single yellow spot at R = 0.4 – 0.5 (benzene –
f
dioxane – acetic acid, 25 : 5 : 1, v/v).
REFERENCES
To this product were added
a
solution of
b-cyanoethylphosphate (pyridinium salt, 2 mmole) in 3 ml of
anhydrous pyridine and N,N¢-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide
1
2
. R. Evans, Science, 240(4854), 889 – 895 (1988).
. M. A. Smith, D. R. Parkinson, B. D. Cheson, et al., J. Clin.
Oncol., 10, 839 (1992).
. C. W. Boone, G. J. Kelloff, and W. E. Malone, Cancer Res.,
5
(
2
413 mg, 2 mmole) and the reaction mixture was stirred for
0 h at 20°C. Then the mixture was cooled to 0°C and 0.5 ml
of water was added, after which stirring was continued for
0 min at room temperature (for tyrosine derivative, the
3
0(1), 2 – 9 (1990).
4. R. C. Moon, H. J. Thompson, P. J. Becci, et al., Cancer Res.,
9(4), 1339 – 1346 (1979).
. R. C. Moon and R. G. Metha, Prev. Med., 18(5), 576 – 591
1989).
3
3
5
6
7
8
phosphorylation was performed in acetonitrile at 20°C for 5
days). The precipitate of N,N¢-dicyclohexylurea was sepa-
rated by filtration. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness and
the residue was purified by chromatography on a silica gel
column eluted with chloroform – methanol (70 – 60 : 30 –
(
. F. Formelli and L. Cleris, Cancer Res., 53(22), 5374 – 5376
(1993).
. F. Formelli and L. Cleris, Eur. J. Cancer, 36(18), 2411 – 2419
2000).
. P. E. Lovat, M. Ranalli, F. Bernassola, et al., Int. J. Cancer,
8(6), 977 – 985 (2000).
9. W. H. Moolenaar, Exp. Cell Res., 253, 230 – 238 (1999).
(
4
0, v/v) mixtures. Fractions containing the target product
8
were evaporated and the residue was dissolved in 1 ml of
THF. The solution was added dropwise with stirring to 1.5 M
NaOH (4 ml) at 0°C and allowed to stand for 25 min. Then
the reaction mixture was acidified to pH 1.5 with 1 M HCl
and extracted with a chloroform – methanol (2 : 1, v/v) mix-
ture. The extract was washed with a chloroform – water
10. T. Sugiura, A. Tokumura, L. Gregory, et al., Arch. Biochem. Bi-
ophys., 311(2), 358 – 368 (1994).
1
1. R. Bittman, B. Swords, K. Liliom, and G. Tigyi, J. Lipid Res.,
7(2), 391 – 398 (1996).
12. J. G. Moffatt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85, 1118 – 1123 (1963).
3
1
3. C. Esteban, M. Geuskens, and J. Uriel, Int. J. Cancer, 49,
25 – 430 (1991).
4. C. Aussel and R. Masseyeff, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,
19(3), 1122 – 1127 (1984).
4
(
10 : 9) mixture, evaporated, and purified by chromatogra-
1
phy on a silica gel column. The target phosphates were
eluted with chloroform – methanol (30 – 20 : 70 – 80, v/v)
mixtures. Fractions containing the target product were com-
1
15. L. I. Survilo, I. I. Vashkevich, M. N. Ermolenko, et al., Izv. Nat.
Akad. Navuk Belarusi, Ser. Khim. Navuk, No. 2, 81 – 85 (2000).
16. V. E. Vaskovsky, E. V. Kostetsky, and I. M. Vasendin, J. Chro-
mat., 114, 129 – 141 (1975).
bined and evaporated. TLC on silica gel: R = 0.05 – 0.10
f
(
chloroform – methanol – 28% ammonia, 9 : 7 : 2, v/v).
17. A. Goldin and S. Carter, in: Cancer Medicine, J. F. Holland and
E. Frei (eds.), Philadelphia (1973), pp. 605 – 628.
Yields and some analytical data are listed in Table 1.