the adsorptionÈdesorption properties of methanol on the
reduced surface prepared by in situ Ar` sputtering.
stantially; however, an almost completely oxidised surface was
easily obtained by oxygen treatment at 820 K.
2.3 Experimental procedure
2
Experimental
After the pre-treatment of the sample, methanol was dosed to
the main chamber at a constant pressure in the range
5 ] 10~9È4 ] 10~6 mbar for varying lengths of time. TPD or
XPS spectra were measured with the background pressure
below 3 ] 10~9 mbar.
2.1 Apparatus
All the experiments were carried in a conventional UHV
chamber with a base pressure in the 10~10 mbar range. The
main background masses in the chamber were 2 (hydrogen),
15,16 (methane) and 28 (carbon monoxide). SrTiO (110)
(Pikem) was mounted without any pre-treatment. The back
3
2.4 XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy)
side and a small part of the front side was covered with gold
foil. It was either heated by the radiation of a W Ðlament from
the back side or cooled by liquid nitrogen constant Ñow into
the copper block mounted above it and connected to the gold
foil. The temperature was monitored with a chromelÈalumel
thermocouple, which was sandwiched between the gold foil
and the sample surface at the front side. A glass vial Ðlled with
methanol (99.8]%, BDH) was connected to the dosing line of
the main chamber, and puriÐed via freezeÈthaw cycles.
Al-Ka (1486.6 eV) radiation was used for the photoemission
measurements. The photoelectrons were collected by a con-
ventional CHA analyser (100 mm/, VSW Ltd) with a pass
energy of 20 eV. During measurement, the sample was earthed
through the thermocouple line.
In general, XPS has been shown to be useful for the analysis
of chemical states due to the chemical shift of the core level
binding energy for di†erent valence states. The states chosen
for the analysis were Ti 2p , 2p , O 1s, Sr 3p , 3p and
3@2
1@2
3@2
1@2
C 1s, respectively.
2.2 Sample treatment
The binding energy reference for the peak position was
either Sr 3p or 3p at 279.5 and 269.1 eV, respectively, on
The sample was oxidised by heating in 1 ] 10~6 mbar O
1@2
3@2
2
the assumption that the position in the binding energy scale
would not change with the experimental conditions, since the
spectral shapes were hardly a†ected throughout the treat-
ments shown in Table 1. By doing this, the charging e†ect on
the measured kinetic energy of photoelectrons is corrected.
When the Au 4f (from the sample holder) was used as a refer-
ence, the peak positions were not consistent for the series of
the spectra, which is owing to charging of the oxide, while the
Au was truly earthed.
(99.0%, ARGO) at 820 K for 10 min and subsequently cooled
in oxygen to 353 K. Ar (99.999%, ARGO) ion sputtering (at
500 K, 4.0 kVÈ1 lA in the scanning mode) was used for the
reduction of the sample, and since the ion gun was di†erentia-
lly pumped the pressure in the main chamber was 5 ] 10~7
mbar. Annealing at 820 K tended to reoxidise the surface sub-
2.5 Angle dependence of XPS
XPS spectra were taken at a glancing emission angle in the
present paper unless otherwise noted. This is to get precise
information on the composition of the surface layer(s). The
angle was adjusted by turning the manipulator connected to
the sample support. The angle between the X-ray gun and the
analyser was about 75¡.
Fig. 2(A) demonstrates that the intensity both of C 1s and
Sr 3p signals changed with variation of the electron take-o†
angle. As the C was on the surface, the change of the C 1s is
mainly the result of the e†ect of the change of X-ray Ñux
intensity. On the other hand, the change of the Sr signal
would be a†ected by variation of both the inelastic mean free
path of the photoelectrons and X-ray Ñux.
The angle dependence of the Sr/C atomic ratio normalised
by cos h is shown in Fig. 2(B) and this supports the above
consideration. The area of Sr 3p (normalised to C integral)
3@2
changed by more than 6 times between glancing and normal
angle. Consequently, as expected, the spectra taken at a glanc-
ing angle are much more surface sensitive than the normal
angle analysis.
2.6 TPD (Temperature-programmed desorption)
The sample was radiatively heated from the back and was
positioned 2 cm from the quadrupole mass analyser (VG). At
the beginning of the heating, typically in the 300È350 K range,
there was an induction period of non-linear heating which was
followed by a constant heating rate, typically D5 K s~1., over
the range 350È650 K.
Fig. 2 (A) Angle dependence of the Sr 2p and C 1s spectra of
SrTiO (110) covered by the contaminant carbon species, measured at
(a) 0¡, (b) 20¡, (c) 60¡, (d) 70¡ and (e) 80¡ from the surface normal,
3
Results
3
showing the increase of the relative intensity of Sr/C at high angles.
3.1 Sample pre-treatment
(B) Dependence of the C 1s/Sr 3p area ratio upon the angle emis-
3@2
After the oxidation treatment, the XPS spectrum of Ti 2p
sion with respect to the surface normal, calculated from Fig. 2(A) (C
1s cross section 1, Sr 4.4).
showed a simple peak characteristic of the Ti4` ion [Fig.
914
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1999, 1, 913È920