A. Meillisa et al. / Food Chemistry 171 (2015) 70–77
71
reducing sugar group, which contain essential compounds that can
be converted into valuable intermediate products.
140 rpm. The time to reach the desired temperature was 30–
75 min. The hydrolysate samples from the reactor were collected
Alginate depolymerisation methods have been widely investi-
gated. Several methods have been used to adjust the molecular
weight and G/M ratio, including acid hydrolysis (Haug, Myklestad,
Larsen, & Smidsrod, 1967), base hydrolysis (Rigouin, Delbarre,
Sinquin, Colliec-Jouault, & Dion, 2009), enzymatic depolymerisa-
tion (Kim et al., 2012), photolytic depolymerisation (Burana-Osot
et al., 2009), and hydrothermal conditions (Aida, Yamagata,
Watanabe, & Smith, 2010). Traditional methods use organic sol-
vents such as ethanol, methanol, or hexane during the extraction
process (Demirel, Yilmaz-Koz, Karabay-Yavagoslu, Ozdemir, &
Sukatar, 2009; Osman, Abushady, & Elshobary, 2010). Although
these methods are useful, they have several disadvantages, includ-
ing the use of harsh chemicals, the need for stable environmental
conditions during enzymatic depolymerisation, long reaction
times, and high experimental costs. To address these disadvantages,
hydrothermal conditions with subcritical water are being used to
break down the complex polysaccharide alginate in brown sea-
weed. Subcritical water is liquid water under pressure at tempera-
tures between the usual boiling point (100 °C) and the critical
temperature (374 °C), also known as superheated water and
pressurised hot water.
and filtered using Whatman nylon membrane filter (0.45 lm)
and stored at 4 °C.
2.4. Total glucose
Total glucose measurements were performed using the phenol
sulphuric acid method (Dubois, Gilles, Hamilton, Rebers, & Smith,
1956) with minor modifications. Briefly, hydrolysate samples
(0.75 ml) were mixed with 2.25 ml of concentrated sulphuric acid.
Then, 0.45 ml of 40% phenol was added and the mixture heated in a
water bath. The mixture was cooled at room temperature and its
absorbance at 490 nm measured using a spectrophotometer (Shi-
madzu 1240 UV–Vis spectrophotometer). D-Glucose was used as
a standard to generate a calibration curve. Each hydrolysate was
analysed in triplicate, and the results are expressed in milligrams
per litre (mg/l).
2.5. Reducing sugar
Reducing sugar analysis was conducted using the 3,5-dinitro-
salicylic (DNS) acid method (Miller, 1959). The reagent solution
was prepared by mixing 10 g of sodium hydroxide and 700 ml of
water until the mixture completely dissolved. Then, 300 g of potas-
sium sodium tartrate was added to the mixture followed by 10 g of
3,5-dinitrosalicylic (DNS) acid. After all of the components were
fully dissolved, 0.5 g sodium sulfite was added followed by 2 g of
phenol. The volume of the mixture was adjusted to 1 L and pro-
tected from light. Reducing sugar analysis was performed by mix-
ing 0.5 ml of hydrolysate water and 0.5 ml of the reagent solution,
heating the mixture for 10 min, and immediately adding 5 ml of
cold water. Finally, the absorbance at 540 nm was measured.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
The brown seaweed Saccharina japonica was collected from
Guemil-eup, Wando-gun, Jeollanam-do, South Korea. Purified algi-
nate from brown algae was provided by Sigma Aldrich (United
Kingdom). High-purity nitrogen gas (99.99%) was supplied by
KOSEM (Yangsan, Republic of Korea). Standards of 2,2-diphenyl-
1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), gallic acid, catechin, D-gulose, and L-man-
2.6. HPLC analysis
nose were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis,
Mo. USA). Distilled water was used in these experiments. All
reagents used in this study were ofanalytical or high performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade and obtained from Sigma
Aldrich Chemical Co.
Gulose and mannose were quantified using high performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) with an evaporative light scattering
detector (ELSD). HPLC analysis was performed using a Jasco HPLC
(Easton, USA) model 400 equipped with ChromNav analysis soft-
ware. High-purity nitrogen (99.99%) from KOSEM Co. was used as
a carrier gas. A Shodex (Japan) SUGAR column (SP0810) of 300 mm
with 8 mm i.d., thermostated to 80 °C, was used to analyse gulose
and mannose compounds. Hydrolysate samples were diluted four-
fold using filtered and sonicated water (HPLC grade). The water
used for elution was filtered using a Whatman nylon membrane
2.2. Sample preparation
After washing fresh S. japonica samples with fresh water,
unused materials, attached salt, and minerals were removed, and
the samples were cut into small pieces. The pieces were dried at
À80 °C for 3 days in a freeze dryer (Eyela FDU-2100, Tokyo Rikaki-
kai Co., LTD, Japan) equipped with a square-type drying chamber
(Eyela DRC-1000, Tokyo Rikakikai Co., LTD, Japan). The dried sam-
ples were collected into sealed plastic bags. The samples were then
finely ground using a mechanical blender (PN SMKA-4000 mixer)
filter (0.45 lm) and sonicated. The flow rate of the eluent was
maintained at 0.6 ml/min. Gulose and mannose standards (pur-
ity > 98%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (United Kingdom).
2.7. Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation-time of flight (MALDI-
TOF) analysis
and sieved through a 710-lm stainless steel sieving mesh.
2.3. Subcritical water hydrolysis
The mass spectra of the hydrolysate solutions were obtained
using the MALDI-TOF Bruker Autoflex-III, as described by Aida
et al. (2010) with minor modifications. Briefly, the device was
equipped with a smart beam laser and the spectra were collected
with an accelerating voltage of 19.8 kV, according to the polarity
of the recording mode. The measurement was performed using 2,5
dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHBA) as a matrix and acetonitrile:water
Subcritical water hydrolysis was performed in a 200-cm3 batch
reactor made of 276 Hastelloy with temperature control (Meillisa,
Chun, & Woo, 2012). A total of 6 g of material samples were loaded
into the reactor. Formic acid (1%), which is used as a catalyst, was
suspended separately in 150 ml of distilled water. The reactor was
then closed and heated using an electric heater to the required
temperature (180–260 °C). Pressures were estimated based on sat-
urated steam to be between 15 and 65 bar for the temperature
range studied. The temperature and pressure in the reactor were
controlled using a temperature controller and pressure gauge,
respectively. The sample was stirred using a four-blade stirrer at
(75:25) as a solvent. Samples were prepared by mixing 0.5
ll of
the product and 0.5 l of the matrix solution. The matrix solution
l
was prepared by mixing a norharmane–acetonitrile solution and
trifluoroacetic acid at a ratio of 7:3. The norharmane–acetonitrile
solution was prepared by dissolving norharmane (10 mg) in
acetonitrile (1 ml).