Notes and references
{ Experimental procedures, all performed at room temperature. (a)
Fixation of 1 in FOMBLIN1, general procedure: A solution of 0.25 mmol
of 17 in 4 mL of the solvent (dichloromethane or cyclohexane) was
transferred into a Schlenk tube containing 4 mL of FOMBLIN1 60 cSt or
2 mL of FOMBLIN1 1400 cSt, purchased from Aldrich and employed
without further purification. After the desired stirring time (from 8 to 45 h),
the mixture was decanted and the upper, organic phase separated. The
volatiles were removed under vacuum and the residue investigated by AAS,
following standard protocols to determine the amount of copper not
absorbed into the FOMBLIN1. (b) Washing with different solvents: A
solution of 1 in FOMBLIN1 (60 cSt), prepared as above and with a
known content of 1, was treated with 4 mL of a given solvent
(dichloromethane, THF, acetone, ethanol or hexane). After 5 min of
stirring, the upper phase was separated and investigated, as above, to
measure the leaching of copper. (c) Styrene cyclopropanation: A solution of
1 in FOMBLIN1 (2.4 6 1023 M, 4 mL of FOMBLIN1) was charged
with 0.5 mmol (57 mg) of ethyl diazoacetate and 2 mmol (208 mg) of
styrene. The mixture was stirred for 1.5 h, and then 4 mL of hexane added.
After 5 min of stirring, the organic phase was separated and investigated by
GC, as previously reported.6 In addition, the amount of copper leached
was also determined by AAS.
Fig. 4 Nitrogen evolution in the reaction of EDA and styrene, catalyzed
by 1 in FOMBLIN1 at room temperature. Run #3 has been omitted for
clarity.
reaction medium has not affected its catalytic properties. Overall,
the use of this copper–FOMBLIN1 system achieves the ultimate
goal for when moving from a homogeneous catalyst towards
heterogeneous conditions: to easily separate the catalyst and
products while operating with the same activities and selectivities
as those of purely homogeneous conditions. There are only a few
examples of fluorous catalysis for the carbene transfer reaction
from diazo compounds to organic substrates, these being based
exclusively on rhodium10 or copper.11 In all cases, a fluorous
ponytail-containing catalyst and a fluorous reaction medium were
employed, with differing results to those presented herein, and
using a fluorous medium with a non-fluorous catalyst. Another
singularity in our case is that the already-reported copper-based
systems for styrene cyclopropanation, under fluorous conditions,
displayed a substantial decrease in yields when the catalyst was
reused in successive cycles. This is not the case for this system,
where yields and selectivities are maintained within a narrow
interval. However, we wish to point out that it is possible that the
catalytic reaction might occur in a homogeneous phase formed by
styrene and EDA, and that the addition of hexane could force the
catalyst to return to the fluorous phase. In any case, this would not
affect the catalytic capabilities of this system in terms of recovery
and reuse.
{ The rate determining step in the metal-catalyzed diazo compound
decomposition corresponds to the formation of a transient metallacarbene
intermediate from the interaction of the catalyst and the diazo compound,
and the concomitant formation of a molecule of N2. See ref. 9.
1 T. Horva´th and J. Ra´bai, Science, 1994, 266, 72.
2 A. P. Dobbs and M. R. Kimberley, J. Fluorine Chem., 2002, 118, 3.
3 J. A. Gladysz and D. P. Curran, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58, 3823.
4 (a) E. de Wolf, G. van Koten and B.-J. Deelman, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1999,
28, 37; (b) I. T. Horva´th, Pure Appl. Chem., 1998, 31, 641.
5 S. Trofimenko, Scorpionates, The Coordination Chemistry of
Polypyrazolylborate Ligands, Imperial College Press, London, 1999.
6 (a) Olefin cyclopropanation: M. M. D´ıaz-Requejo, T. R. Belderrain,
S. Trofimenko and P. J. Pe´rez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 3167;
M. M. D´ıaz-Requejo, A. Caballero, T. R. Belderrain, M. C. Nicasio,
S. Trofimenko and P. J. Pe´rez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 978; (b)
Alkyne cyclopropenation: M. M. D´ıaz-Requejo, M. A. Mairena,
T. R. Belderrain, M. C. Nicasio, S. Trofimenko and P. J. Pe´rez, Chem.
Commun., 2001, 1804; (c) N–H insertion: M. E. Morilla, M. M. D´ıaz-
Requejo, T. R. Belderrain, M. C. Nicasio, S. Trofimenko and P. J. Pe´rez,
Chem. Commun., 2002, 2998; (d) O–H insertion: M. E. Morilla,
M. J. Molina, M. M. D´ıaz-Requejo, T. R. Belderrain, M. C. Nicasio,
S. Trofimenko and P. J. Pe´rez, Organometallics, 2004, 23, 2914; (e)
Addition to aromatic rings: M. E. Morilla, M. M. D´ıaz-Requejo,
T. R. Belderrain, M. C. Nicasio, S. Trofimenko and P. J. Pe´rez,
Organometallics, 2004, 23, 293; (f) Addition to furans: A. Caballero,
M. M. D´ıaz-Requejo, M. C. Nicasio, S. Trofimenko, T. R. Belderrain
and P. J. Pe´rez, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 6101.
In conclusion, we have discovered that complex
TpBr3Cu(NCMe) (1) can be absorbed in perfluoropolyether
CF3O[–CF(CF3)CF2O–]x(–CF2O–)yCF3, FOMBLIN1 (60 cSt),
in spite of the lack of any fluorine atoms in the structure of the
copper complex. The absorbed amounts of 1 can be employed to
catalyze the styrene cyclopropanation reaction with ethyl diazoa-
cetate, in a process that provides the expected cyclopropanes with
constant yields and diastereoselectivities along five cycles of
recovery and reuse of the catalyst-containing fluorous phase. We
believe that this finding could open up a new area in designing
non-fluorine-containing catalysts for use in certain fluorous
reaction media.
7 (a) M. M. D´ıaz-Requejo, T. R. Belderrain, M. C. Nicasio,
S. Trofimenko and P. J. Pe´rez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 896; (b)
A. Caballero, M. M. D´ıaz-Requejo, T. R. Belderrain, M. C. Nicasio,
S. Trofimenko and P. J. Pe´rez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 1446; (c)
A. Caballero, M. M. D´ıaz-Requejo, T. R. Belderrain, M. C. Nicasio,
S. Trofimenko and P. J. Pe´rez, Organometallics, 2003, 22, 4145.
8 M. M. Dı´az-Requejo, P. Wehrmann, M. D. Leatherman,
S. Trofimenko, S. Mecking, M. Brookhart and P. J. Pe´rez,
Macromolecules, 2005, 38, 4966.
9 M. P. Doyle, M. A. McKervey and T. Ye, Modern Catalytic Methods
for Organic Synthesis with Diazo Compounds, John Wiley & Sons, New
York, 1998.
10 (a) A. Biffis, M. Braga, S. Cadamuro, C. Tubaro and M. Basato, Org.
Lett., 2005, 7, 1841; (b) A. Endres and G. Maas, J. Organomet. Chem.,
2002, 643–644, 174; (c) A. Endres and G. Maas, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58,
3999; (d) A. Endres and G. Maas, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 6365.
11 (a) J. Bayardon, D. Sinou, O. Holczknecht, L. Mercs and G. Pozzi,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2005, 16, 2319; (b) I. Shepperson, S. Quici,
G. Pozzi, M. Nicoletti and D. O’Hagan, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2004, 4545;
(c) R. Annunziatta, M. Benaglia, M. Cinquini, F. Cozzi and G. Pozzi,
Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2003, 1191.
We thank the MEC (Proyecto BQU2002-01114) for financial
support and the Ramo´n y Cajal Program for a Research
Fellowship (M. M. D. R.). We also thank the Universidad
de Huelva for a Research Studentship (J. U.) and the NMR
Service.
1002 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 1000–1002
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006