E. Guillam o´ n et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 693 (2008) 1723–1727
1725
spectropolarimeter. The sample solutions were prepared in
2.4. Preparation of (P)-[Mo Se ((R,R)-Me–
3 4
a 1 cm path length quartz cuvette and measured at 25 °C.
UV–Vis measurements were carried out in a Shimadzu
UV-1603 instrument and the samples were prepared in a
BPE) Cl ](Cl) (1c)
3 3
This compound was prepared by an excision reaction of
the polymeric {Mo Se Cl } phase (0.300 g, 0.306 mmol)
1
-cm path length quartz cuvette, and measured at room
3
7
4 n
temperature. Column chromatography was carried out
using silica gel (60 A).
with (R,R)-Me–BPE (0.355 g, 1.374 mmol) in CH CN
3
˚
(25 mL) under reflux. After 48 h, the reaction mixture
was filtered to remove a small amount of the insoluble
impurities. The resulting filtrate was dried under vacuum,
and the solid was recrystallized from CH Cl /ether mix-
2
BPE) Br ](Br) (1b)
.2. Preparation of (P)-[Mo S ((R,R)-Me–
3 4
3
3
2
2
tures to yield 213 mg (46%) of 1c as a brown solid.
3
1
1
The molecular compound [TBA] [Mo S Br ] (0.150 g,
.102 mmol), where TBA = tetrabutylammonium was
reacted with (R,R)-Me–BPE (0.118 g, 0.457 mmol) in
P{ H} NMR (in CD Cl , 121.44 MHz) d = 54.47 (dd,
2 2
2
3
7
6
ꢀ
1
0
3P), 72.91 (dd, 3P). IR (cm , KBr): 2926 (i), 2864 (i), 953
(i), 1452 (i), 1407 (m), 1067 (m), 921 (d), 694 (m), 626 (m),
459 (d). UV–Vis (nm, CH Cl ): k(e): 442 (6761.90), 245
(55809.52 mol m cm ). ESI-MS (CH Cl , 80 V) m/z:
2 2
1485 [M ]. Anal. Calc. Mo Cl Se P C H : C, 30.94; H,
CH CN (20 mL) under refluxing conditions for 24 h. The
3
2
2
ꢀ1
3
ꢀ1
green solution was filtered to remove a small amount of
undissolved material. The filtrate was concentrated and
then ether was added to form a precipitate. The green solid
was washed with 10 mL of benzene, followed by 30 mL of a
mixture of toluene:acetone (95:5), and finally with ether to
+
3
4
4 6 18 48
5.20. Found: C, 30.30; H, 4.90%.
2.5. Preparation of (P)-[Mo CuSe ((R,R)-Me–
3
4
3
1
1
yield 0.107 g (70%) of 1b:
P{ H} NMR (CD Cl ,
BPE) Cl ]PF (2c)
3 4 6
2
2
1
21.44 MHz) d: 49.31 (dd, 3P), 62.62 (dd, 3P) (second order
0
00
0
00
ꢀ1
system AA A BB B ). IR (cm , KBr): 2926 (i), 2864 (i),
Compound
(P)-[Mo Se ((R,R)-Me–BPE) Cl ](Cl)
3 4 3 3
9
6
2
53 (i), 1452 (i), 1407 (m), 1067 (m), 921 (d), 694 (m),
(0.150 g, 0.099 mmol) 1c reacted with an excess
26 (m), 459 (d). UV–Vis (nm, CH Cl ): 632, 394, 343,
of [Cu(MeCN) ]PF (0.050 g, 0.505 mmol) and TBACl
2
2
4
6
89. ESI-MS (CH CN, 80 V): m/z (%) = 1431 (100)
(0.040 g, 0.140 mmol) in CH Cl (15 mL) for 24 h at room
2 2
temperature. The same procedure described for compound
3
+
[
M ]. Anal. Calc. Mo Br S C H P : C, 33.39; H, 5.62.
3
4 4 42 84 6
Found: C, 33.15; H, 5.41%.
2b was followed to obtain 0,131 g (82%) in yield of
3
1
1
compound 2c, as red solid: P{ H} NMR (CD Cl ,
2
2
ꢀ
1
2
BPE) Br ]PF (2b)
.3. Preparation of (P)-[Mo CuS ((R,R)-Me–
3
121.44 MHz) d: 56.22 (d, 3P), 69.52(d, 3P). IR (cm ,
4
KBr): 2926.89 (i), 2853 (i), 1458 (i), 1260 (m), 1070 (i),
04 (i), 796 (m), 692 (i), 466 (d), 421(d), 360 (d). UV–Vis
(nm, CH Cl ) k(e): 525 (2135.80), 467 (2216.05), 336
3
4
6
9
This cluster was prepared following a similar procedure
to that of (P)-2a [6] but dissolving [Mo S ((R,R)-Me–
2
2
+
(8574.08). ESI-EM (CH Cl , 85 V) m/z: 1514 (M ). Anal.
2 2
3
4
BPE) Br ]Br (0.080 g, 0.060 mmol) and TBABr (0.030 g,
Calc. Mo Cl CuS P F C H : C, 31.14; H, 5.24. Found:
3 4 4 7 6 42 84
3
3
0
.086 mmol) in the presence of an excess of [Cu-
C, 31.64; H, 5.41%.
(
MeCN) ]PF (0.112 g, 0.303 mmol) in 20 mL of THF
4
6
under nitrogen. After refluxing the reaction for 24 h, unre-
acted solid [Cu(MeCN) ]PF was separated by filtration
3. Results and discussion
4
6
and the desired product was precipitated by addition of
ether. The precipitated was filtered off, redisolved in
CH Cl and adsorbed in a silica gel column. The column
3.1. Synthesis of trinuclear and tetranuclear compounds
As in the case of 1a.Cl, the reaction between the chiral
phosphane (R,R)-Me–BPE and [TBA] [Mo S Br ] in
2
2
was first washed with CH Cl and then eluted with a 2 M
2
2
2
3
7
6
KPF solution in acetone, affording a red solution. The
CH CN (20 mL) led to the formation of only one out of
6
3
solution was taken to dryness, redissolved in 15 mL of
CH Cl and filtered in order to eliminate the insoluble
the four possible trinuclear complexes with formula
3
1
[Mo S ((R,R)-Me–BPE) Br ](Br). Data from P NMR
2
2
3
4
3
3
KBr and KPF inorganic salts. Remaining TBABr salt
(two doublets at 49.31 and 62.62 ppm, typical features of
6
0
00
0
00
was removed by several washing with water (4 ꢁ 15 mL).
a second order AA A BB B system) and IR spectroscopy,
mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis for this com-
pound were consistent with the structure of 1b.Br (Scheme
1). The stereochemistry of this compound was considered
as (P) by comparison of its CD spectrum with that of
(P)-1a.Cl [6]; each had a positive sign in its spectrum. On
treatment of (P)-1b.Br with [Cu(MeCN) ]PF /TBABr, the
The dichloromethane phase was dried over MgSO
4
and the resulting solution was taken to dryness to yield
3
1
1
0
1
1
3
2
.050 g (73%) of 2b as a red solid: P{ H} NMR (CD Cl ,
2 2
ꢀ1
21.44 MHz) d: 30.15 (d, 3P), 87.3 (d, 3P). IR (cm , KBr):
419 (i), 940 (i), 840 (i, P–F), 558 (i, P–F), 441 (d), 420 (d),
58 (d). UV–Vis (nm, CH Cl ): 603 (b), 441 (b), 331 (b),
2
2
4
6
+
85 (b). ESI-EM (CH Cl , 85 V) m/z: 1514 (M ). Anal.
chiral hetereo cuboidal cluster (P)-[Mo CuS ((R,R)-Me–
3 4
2
2
Calc. Mo Br CuS P F C H : C, 30.50; H, 5.13. Found:
C, 31.12; H, 5.34%.
BPE) Br ]PF , (P)-2b.PF (Scheme 1), was obtained in
3 4 6 6
3
4
4
7
6
42 84
3
1
good yield [9]. This compound was characterized by
P