Table 2 Meinwald rearrangement–Knoevenagel condensationa
was tested by performing a tandem reaction between 5 and 7
using the recovered catalyst, which produced the final product
in 65% yield. The structural integrity of the catalyst remained
unaffected even after two cycles, as evidenced by PXRD
analysis (see ESIw).
Entry Substrate Nucleophile Product
Conversionb (yield) (%)
In summary, we have successfully demonstrated tandem
catalysis using a bifunctional MOF, NH2-MIL-101(Al), as a
site-isolated Lewis acid-Brønsted base catalyst. The Lewis
acidic sites exhibited remarkable substrate selectivity for
epoxide ring opening by Meinwald rearrangement via a
benzylic 31 carbocation intermediate to form aldehydes. The
subsequent Knoevenagel condensation of the aldehydes with
an active methylene nucleophile catalyzed by basic catalytic
sites completed a one-pot tandem reaction with high conversion.
Taking advantage of the aldehyde electrophile as an inter-
mediate, facile synthesis of more complex molecules using
different nucleophiles in tandem in a similar catalytic process
is anticipated. Work along this line is in progress.
1
5
6
7
7
80(70)
2
75(70)c
a
Conditions: reactions were carried out using 0.13 mmol of epoxide
b
and malononitrile 7 each with 10 mol% of the catalyst. Isolated
We gratefully acknowledge the Acceleration Research,
Brain Korea 21, and World Class University (Project No.
R31-2008-000-10059-0) of the National Research Foundation
of Korea and the Korean Ministry of Education, Science, and
Technology (MEST). We also thank J. Mark Kim for helpful
discussions.
c
yields based on epoxides. Reaction was carried out for 96 h.
Table 3 Control experimentsa
Entry Substrate Nucleophile Catalyst
Product Conversionc (%)
5a 85
1
2
3
4
5
5
5a
5
7
7
7
7
AlCl3
ATAb
ATA
AlCl3 +
ATA
5a/5b o1
5b
5a
65
85
Notes and references
1 A. E. Allen and D. W. C. MacMillan, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 633.
2 K. C. Nicolaou, D. J. Edmonds and P. G. Bulger, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 7134.
a
Conditions: All the reactions were carried out using 0.13 mmol of
epoxide or aldehyde and malononitrile 7 with 10 mol% of the catalyst.
3 B. Voit, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 4238.
b
c
Dimethyl 2-aminoterephthalate. Conversions were calculated
4 (a) S. Shylesh, A. Wagener, A. Seifert, S. Ernst and W. R. Thiel,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 184; (b) N. R. Shiju,
A. H. Alberts, S. Khalid, D. R. Brown and G. Rothenberg, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 9615.
1
using H NMR based on epoxides.
5 For themed issues on MOF: Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1213–1504;
Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 673–1268.
6 J.-Y. Lee, O. M. Farha, J. Roberts, K. Scheidt, S. T. Nguyen and
J. T. Hupp, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1450.
unaffected. This clearly confirmed that the tandem epoxide
ring opening and Knoevenagel condensation reaction was
promoted by heterogeneous NH2-MIL-101(Al) as a catalyst.
As another control experiment, when the tandem reaction was
carried out with 5 and 7 along with AlCl3 (10 mol%) as a
catalyst (Table 3, entry 1) the epoxide ring opening occurred,
but the Knoevenagel condensation failed to take place. A
similar reaction with 10 mol% dimethyl 2-aminoterephthalate
(ATA), an ester analogue of the organic linker present in the
framework, as a catalyst under the same conditions left the
epoxide unaffected (Table 3, entry 2).
7 Z. Wang, G. Chen and K. Ding, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 322.
8 (a) L. Ma, C. Abney and W. Lin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1248;
(b) A. Corma, H. Garcia, F. X. Llabres and I. Xamena, Chem.
Rev., 2010, 110, 4606; (c) M. Yoon, R. Srirambalaji and K. Kim,
Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1196.
9 (a) B. Li, Y. Zhang, D. Ma, L. Li, G. Li, Z. Shi and S. Feng, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 6151; (b) A. Arnanz, M. Pintado-Sierra,
A. Corma, M. Iglesias and F. Sanchez, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2012,
354, 1347; (c) J. Park, J.-R. Li, Y.-P. Chen, J. Yu,
A. a. Yakovenko, Z. U. Wang, L.-B. Sun, P. B. Balbuena and
H.-C. Zhou, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 9995.
However, when aldehyde 5a was allowed to react with
malononitrile 7 using 10 mol% ATA as a catalyst (Table 3,
entry 3), it resulted in the Knoevenagel condensation product 5b.
When a homogeneous mixture of AlCl3 and ATA (Table 3,
entry 4) was used as a catalyst, epoxide ring opening occurred,
presumably because the mixture was still acidic enough to
catalyze the reaction, but the Knoevenagel condensation failed
to occur as anticipated, since free amine groups of ATA
were not available for catalysis. This clearly confirms that
the site-isolation of reactive Lewis acidic and Brønsted basic
functional groups in the MOF is essential for the tandem
reaction, which is otherwise impossible with a homogeneous
mixture of AlCl3 and ATA. The recyclability of the catalyst
10 (a) P. Serra-Crespo, E. V. Ramos-Fernandez, J. Gascon and
F. Kapteijn, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 2565; (b) G. Ferey,
C. Mellot-Draznieks, C. Serre, F. Millange, J. Dutour, S. Surble
and I. Margiolaki, Science, 2005, 309, 2040.
11 A. K. Yudin, Aziridines and Epoxides in Organic Synthesis,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006.
12 Z. Wang, Comprehensive Organic Name Reactions and Reagents,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2010, pp. 1880–1882.
13 F. Vermoortele, M. Vandichel, B. V. Voorde, M. Waroquier,
V. V. Speybroeck and D. De Vos, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012,
51, 4887.
14 B. C. Ranu and U. Jana, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 8212.
15 M. W. C. Robinson, K. S. Pillinger, I. Mabbett, D. A. Timms and
A. E. Graham, Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 8377.
16 M. W. C. Robinson, A. M. Davies, R. Buckle, I. Mabbett,
S. H. Taylor and A. E. Graham, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7, 2559.
c
11652 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 11650–11652
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012