10.1002/cctc.201700944
ChemCatChem
COMMUNICATION
solution with a pH meter (PHS-3E, Leici Instruments Co., Ltd) before being
analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Shimadzu
LC-20AD).
reports,[34, 35] D-(−)-erythrose was prepared by degrading D-
arabinose oxime through the acetylated aldononitrile,[34]
while D-(−)-erythronolactone was obtained by oxidation of D-
ascorbic acid with hydrogen peroxide and a base.[35] Our
results provided a new synthetic route to convert D-hexose to
D-tetrose, such that D-(−)-erythronolactone can be obtained
by oxidation of D-(−)-erythrose. Therefore, we further
attempted the conversion of D-tetrose, and most of the as-
prepared D-(−)-erythrose was oxidized to D-(−)-erythronic acid
(ERA) over an Au-hydrotalcite (Au/HT) catalyst at 1.7 MPa of
O2 (Fig. S11). In this case, D-(−)-erythronolactone can be easily
achieved via acidification of the above solution with HCl, and
subsequently separated from water by extraction with ethyl
acetate.[32] These results demonstrated the maintaining and
transferring of natural chirality derived from C6 sugars via a
one-pot process. Nevertheless, although this catalytic system
involves an epimerization-driven reaction route, how to
efficiently prevent and control of the aldose-ketose
interconversion in the presence of a Lewis acid, which finally
determines the yield of single tetrose, still remains an issue.
Accordingly, further improvements can be expected through
the use of multi-functional catalysts or structural stabilizers.
In conclusion, we have proposed an efficient strategy to
produce D-tetrose from biomass-derived C6 aldoses via a fast
retro-aldol process at mild conditions. In such catalytic system,
chiral D-tetrose was readily obtained with the yield up to 46%
and identified from D-(+)-glucose/D-(+)-mannose in the
presence of tungstic or molybdic catalysts. We noted that
tungstic or molybdic compounds can selectively achieve
epimerization of aldose–aldose (D-(+)-glucose and D-(+)-
mannose) while decreasing the extent of aldose–ketose
isomerization, which is key to successfully accumulate D-
tetrose rather than triose or their mixtures in the reaction
mixture. Moreover, we tried the further transformation of as-
prepared chiral D-tetrose toward its oxidative product
erythronic acid by a one-pot cascade catalytic process. These
results obtained in the current work not only demonstrate the
production of chiral C4 skeleton from C6 sugars but also
provide an achievable platform for the complete retainment
and delivery of its natural chirality.
Inter-conversion among the three D-hexoses at low temperature: D-
hexose (0.1 g) without any pretreatment and 20 mg of AT/Pb(NO3)2 were
dissolved in 10 mL of water to obtain a certain concentration of the reaction
solution. The mixture solution was placed in the microwave-assisted
reactor for 5–40 min at 100–160 oC. The reaction mixture was cooled and
subsequently analyzed by HPLC at certain time intervals. Prior to the
analysis, the pH value of the solution was accurately adjusted to 7.0 by
using a 0.25 mol∙L-1 NaOH solution.
Preparation of the Au-loaded hydrotalcite (Au/HT) catalyst:
Hydrotalcite (HT) with a Mg/Al molar ratio of 4.0 was prepared by
hydrothermal synthesis at 140 oC for 20 h. Typically, 20.51 g of Mg(NO3)2
∙6H2O, 7.5 g of Al(NO3)3∙6H2O, and 24 g of urea were added to 200 g of
deionized water with an ultrasonic bath. The mixture was subsequently
placed into a Teflon-lined autoclave. After reacting at 140 oC for 20 h, the
mixture was filtered and washed with deionized water. Then the as-
prepared HT solids were subsequently dried overnight at 60 oC and
grinded for further use. Furthermore, 100 g of a HAuCl4 aqueous solution
(1.0 wt%), with a pH value pre-adjusted to 8–9 by ammonium hydroxide,
was added drop by drop to the grinded HT aqueous solution (1.0 wt%, 100
g). Five grams of a 1.0 wt% NaBH4 aqueous solution were subsequently
added to the mixture and stirred at room temperature for 10 h. Once filtered,
dried, and grinded, the Au/HT sample was activated in a hydrogen furnace
at 300 oC for 3 h before used.
Conversion of D-hexose into D-(−)-erythronic acid (ERA): The
activated Au/HT catalyst (85 mg) was added to 4 g of the above reaction
mixture, and the solution pH value was adjusted to 10.0 by using a 2.0 wt%
NaOH solution. The mixture solution was subsequently stirred at an
oxygen pressure of 1.7 MPa and room temperature for 40 h. The reaction
mixture was analyzed by HPLC at certain time intervals. Before being
analyzed by HPLC, the pH value of the solution was accurately adjusted
to 7.0 by using a 0.25 mol∙L-1 H2SO4 solution. The corresponding details
about the product analysis see the Supporting Information.
Acknowledgements
Experimental Section
This work was supported by NSFC (21673045, U1463206,
21473037, 21433002 and 21573046), 973 Program
(2013CB934101), Sinopec (X514005).
Conversion of D-hexose towards D-tetrose: All the catalytic reactions
were carried out in a 30 mL reactor under microwave irradiation. The
microwave field was provided by a single-mode microwave instrument
(Nova-2s, Preekem Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd). The used radiation
frequency was 2.45 GHz while the highest output power was 500 W. The
temperature of the reaction system was measured by an infrared (IR)
detector assembled in the microwave instrument. D-hexose (0.1–1.0 g)
without any pretreatment and various catalysts (5–100 mg) were dissolved
in 10 mL of water to obtain a certain concentration in the reaction solution.
The mixture solution was placed in the microwave-assisted reactor for 5 s
Keywords: biomass conversion • D-tetrose • retro-aldol reaction
• chiral synthon • epimerization
[1]
[2]
[3]
G. W. Huber, J. N. Chheda, C. J. Barrett, J. A. Dumesic, Science, 2005,
308, 1446-1450.
Y. Roman-Leshkov, C. J. Barrett, Z. Y. Liu, J. A. Dumesic, Nature, 2007,
́
447, 982-986.
E. L. Kunkes, D. A. Simonetti, R. M. West, J. C. Serrano-Ruiz, C. A.
Gärtner, J. A. Dumesic, Science, 2008 322, 417-421.
U. Addepally, C. Thulluri, Fuel, 2015, 159, 935-942.
M. S. Holm, S. Saravanamurugan, E. Taarning, Science, 2010, 328, 602-
605.
10 min at 170–200 oC. The reaction mixture was cooled and
[4]
[5]
–
subsequently analyzed at a certain time interval. The pH value of the
solution was accurately adjusted to 7.0 by using a 0.25 mol∙L-1 NaOH
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.