The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Article
LUMO to macrocycle 4. The very even distribution of orbital
density throughout the macrocyclic core over the heterocyclic
and p-phenylene rings for compound 4 via the meso sp2 carbon
atoms support the effective π overlap along the predicted
conjugation pathway.
As clearly shown in Figure 4, the presence of a six-
membered p-phenylene ring in the place of a five-membered
pyrrole ring in macrocycle 4 stabilizes the LUMO because of
which the HOMO−LUMO band gap also undergoes a notable
decrease from ΔE = 1.8053 eV in macrocycle26 3 to ΔE =
1.5367 eV in macrocycle 4, but both these macrocycles show
comparable absorption features. The HOMO−LUMO gap
(1.5367 eV) in macrocycle 4 matches well with the
experimentally computed value from the cyclic voltammetric
study (Table S1). Thus, the spectral and electrochemical
properties predicted by DFT are consistent with the
experimental data.
that for rings consisting of localized single and double bonds,
very small and negative HOMA values are obtained, suggesting
its nonaromatic nature.38,39
Thus, the spectral and electrochemical properties predicted
by DFT agreed closely with the experimental data. In short, the
absence of bond length equalization, low-field 1H NMR shifts,
small NICS values, and nonplanar structure40 undoubtedly
supports the nonaromatic nature of macrocycle 4.
CONCLUSIONS
■
In summary, we have successfully synthesized the stable
nonaromatic 2,6-pyri-dithia-p-benzihexaphyrins 4 and 5 using-
[3 + 3] condensation reaction with the readily available
precursors. To the best of our knowledge, compounds 4 and 5
represent one of the limited examples of the pyridine-
incorporated dithia para-benzihexaphyrins. The nonaromatic
features of the macrocycles were revealed by absorption and
NMR studies. The experimental results were further supported
by DFT studies. We anticipate that the presence of pyridine/
pyrrole nitrogens, p-phenylene carbons, and thiophene sulfurs
would help to form interesting coordination compounds and
such studies are underway.
Furthermore, the TD-DFT studies were also performed to
predict the oscillator strength and excitation energies of the
first S0−Sn transitions. The calculated vertical excitation
energies for macrocycle 4 fairly matched with their respective
experimental data both in position and in relative intensity. In
the case of compound 4 (Figure 4b), the absorption/
excitations around the region of 390−410 and ∼500 nm
with large oscillator strengths originating mainly from HOMO
− 1 → LUMO + 1 and HOMO − 1 → LUMO transitions,
respectively, while the broad band of low intensity in the
region of 700−900 nm arises from the HOMO → LUMO
transition. However, for macrocycle26 3, the HOMO →
LUMO + 2 transitions were responsible for the sharp intense
band around 410 nm and the low energy charge transfer band
was mainly a consequence of the HOMO → LUMO
transitions. Upon protonation, the HOMO−LUMO band
gap for both the compounds 3.2H2+ and 4.2H2+ showed a
significant decrease in energy (ΔE = 1.2263 eV for 4.2H2+ and
1.4829 eV for 3.2H2+) as compared to their corresponding free
bases 4 and 3, respectively, which justifies the observed
bathochromic shifts in the absorption spectra (Figure S18).
The 1H chemical shifts of compound 4 were simulated using
the gauge-including atomic orbital method at the B3LYP/6-
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
General Experimental Section. All the chemicals used for the
synthesis were of reagent grade unless otherwise specified. Boron
trifluoride diethyl etherate (BF3·OEt2), TFA, and 2,3-dichloro-5,6-
dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) obtained from Sigma-Aldrich were
used as such. All other chemicals used for the synthesis were of
reagent grade unless otherwise specified. The 2,6-pyri diol 8 (10,10′-
Bis[4-(tert-butyl)phenyl]-1,3-bis(2-thienyl)-pyridinediol) was pre-
pared by following our reported procedure.26 Solvents such as
petroleum ether (60−80 °C), ethyl acetate, and dichloromethane
purchased from Merck, India, were used without further purification.
Column chromatography was performed on basic alumina (80−200
mesh). 1H (1D and 2D) and 13C{1H} NMR spectra were recorded on
a Bruker 400 and 500 MHz FT-NMR spectrometer in CDCl3 using
tetramethylsilane as the internal reference. The 13C{1H} NMR
frequencies are 125.77 and 100.06 MHz for 500 and 400 MHz
instruments, respectively. Structural assignments were made with
additional information from 1H−1H COSY and 1H−1H NOESY
experiments. The high-resolution mass spectroscopy (HR-MS)
spectra were recorded with a Bruker maXis Impact and QTof micro
mass spectrometer using positive mode ESI methods in acetonitrile or
methanol. UV−visible absorption spectra were recorded on a Cary
Series UV−vis−NIR and a UV 3600 Shimadzu spectrophotometer.
The stock solutions of the compounds (5 × 10−4 M) were prepared
using HPLC-grade chloroform. Cyclic voltammetric studies were
carried out with a BAS electrochemical system utilizing the three-
electrode configuration consisting of glassy carbon (working
electrode), platinum wire (auxiliary electrode), and saturated calomel
(reference electrode) electrodes. The concentrations of the samples
were maintained as 0.01 M containing tetrabutylammonium
perchlorate (TBAP) as the supporting electrolyte (0.1 M) in
dichloromethane at 25 °C under an argon atmosphere at a scan
rate of 50 mV/s. The half-wave potentials measured using DPV were
calculated manually by taking the average of the cathodic and anodic
peak potentials. All the potentials were calibrated by using ferrocene
as an external standard, taking E1/2 (Fc/Fc+) = 0.42 V versus SCE.
All the theoretical calculations utilized 6-31g(d,p) level of theory
and were performed using the Gaussian09 package. The ground-state
geometry optimization, NICS,32 and AICD calculations for the
compounds 4 and 5 were performed at the DFT level using Becke’s
three-parameter functional combined with the Lee−Yang−Parr
exchange correlation functional (B3LYP).
1
311G(d,p) level. The H chemical shift values were calculated
with reference to CHCl3 (7.26 ppm). The simulated 1H NMR
was qualitatively in good agreement with the experimentally
recorded 1H NMR spectrum in CDCl3 (Figure 1). The
experimental and theoretical chemical shifts are presented in
the para-phenylene protons of macrocycle 4, the type h and
type g observed at 6.93 and 7.62 ppm in the 1H NMR
spectrum appeared at 7.03 and 7.26, respectively, in the
theoretically computed spectrum.
For the quantitative evaluation of aromaticity, the NICS33
and harmonic oscillator model of aromaticity (HOMA)34
values were calculated for macrocycle 4. The isotropic NICS
(NICS(0)iso) and the zz component of the shielding tensor
(NICS(0)zz) values in the S0 state for the compound 4 are
−0.6220 and +4.5369, respectively, suggesting its nonaromatic
nature.35−38 Thus, the molecule lacks both local and ground-
state global aromaticity. The HOMA indices were calculated39
along various π-conjugation paths using the optimized
structure for macrocycle 4. The HOMA factor is 0 for a
model nonaromatic ring and 1 for a system where there is
complete delocalization. The HOMA values of macrocycle 4
range from −0.26 to 0.47 (Figure S19). It has been reported
Compound 4. To a solution of 1,3-bis(2-thienyl)-pyridinediol26
(100 mg, 0.176 mmol) and 1,4-bis(p-tolyl(2-pyrolyl)methyl)
6671
J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 6665−6673