O rP gl ea na si ce &d Bo i on mo to al e dc juu l sa tr mC ha er mg i ins ts ry
Page 4 of 6
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
caveolin-1 antibody (Green) or anti-clathrin heavy chain antibody
Notes and references
DOI: 10.1039/D0OB00265H
(Green). Nuclei of A431 cells were stained in blue by Hoechst 33342.
o
o
1
2
3
a) A. Beck, L. Goetsch, C. Dumontet and N. Corvaia, Nat. Rev.
Drug Discov., 2017, 16, 315; b) R. V. Chari, M. L. Miller and W. C.
Widdison, Angew Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 3796.
7
D12-conjugates at two different temperatures 4 C or 37 C). As
shown in Fig. 5a & S27, the uptake of all tested 7D12-conjugates
o
was significantly inhibited at 4 C, suggesting 7D12-conjugates were
a) C. Chalouni and S. Doll, J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res., 2018, 37, 20;
b) M. Ritchie, L. Tchistiakova and N. Scott, mAbs, 2013, 5, 13; c)
Y. V. Kovtun and V. S. Goldmacher, Cancer Lett., 2007, 255, 232.
a) F. Loganzo, M. Sung and H. P. Gerber, Mol. Cancer Ther.,
internalized via an energy-dependent endocytosis mode. Next,
A431 cells were treated with various endocytosis inhibitors before
o
incubation with the tested conjugates at 37 C, i.e., chlorpromazine
2
016, 15, 2825; b) C. Rios-Luci, S. Garcia-Alonso, E. Diaz-
(CPZ), nystatin and ethylisopropylamiloride (EIPA), which block
Rodriguez, M. Nadal-Serrano, J. Arribas, A. Ocana and A.
Pandiella, Cancer Res., 2017, 77, 4639; c) M. Sung, X. Tan, B. Lu,
J. Golas, C. Hosselet, F. Wang, L. Tylaska, L. King, D. Zhou, R.
Dushin, J. S. Myers, E. Rosfjord, J. Lucas, H. P. Gerber and F.
Loganzo, Mol. Cancer Ther., 2018, 17, 243.
clathrin-mediated endocytosis, caveolae-mediated endocytosis and
macropinocytosis, respectively. Quantification of the internalized
1
7
conjugates was conducted as previously reported, and the results
was shown in Fig. S28. From Fig. 5b & Fig. S28, each of these
inhibitors was shown to decrease endocytosis of all tested
conjugates, indicating that all three pathways were involved to a
different extent. Notably, the clathrin-mediated endocytosis
inhibitor CPZ was found to significantly reduce the cellular uptake
4
a) C. Le Roy and J. L. Wrana, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2005, 6,
1
12; b) Y. Chen, G. Liu, L. Guo, H. Wang, Y. Fu and Y. Luo, Int. J.
Cancer, 2015, 136, 182.
5
6
B. Razani, S. E. Woodman and M. P. Lisanti, Pharma. Rev., 2002,
54, 431.
a) L. J. Hewlett, A. R. Prescott and C. Watts, J. Cell Biol., 1994,
1 2
of 7D12-TAMRA-P and 7D12-TAMRA-P , suggesting that clathrin
1
1
24, 689; b) E. L. Racoosin and J. A. Swanson, J. Cell Biol., 1993,
21, 1011.
was largely involved. To further explore the endocytosis
mechanism, antibody against caveolin-1 or clathrin heavy chain was
used to visualize two distinct uptake pathways (Fig. 5c). Our data
7
a) J. Andreev, N. Thambi, A. E. Perez Bay, F. Delfino, J. Martin, M.
P. Kelly, J. R. Kirshner, A. Rafique, A. Kunz, T. Nittoli, D.
MacDonald, C. Daly, W. Olson and G. Thurston, Mol. Cancer
Ther., 2017, 16, 681; b) R. M. DeVay, K. Delaria, G. Zhu, C. Holz,
D. Foletti, J. Sutton, G. Bolton, R. Dushin, C. Bee, J. Pons, A.
Rajpal, H. Liang, D. Shelton, S. H. Liu and P. Strop, Bioconjug.
Chem., 2017, 28, 1102; c) B. E. de Goeij, T. Vink, H. Ten Napel, E.
C. Breij, D. Satijn, R. Wubbolts, D. Miao and P. W. Parren, Mol.
Cancer Ther., 2016, 15, 2688.
further confirmed that 7D12-P
1 2
and 7D12-P were internalized
predominantly through clathrin-mediated pathway while 7D12-P
3
appeared to be internalized by both caveolin- and clathrin-
mediated pathways equally.
In summary, a proof-of-concept study was conducted to engage
clathrin-mediated endocytosis of antibody conjugates. An anti-EGFR
nanobody (7D12) was labeled with lysosome-sorting NPGY signals
at the C-terminus via sortase-mediated ligation. Labeling with a
GGGNPGY or RRRRRRRRRNPGY motif resulted in two novel protein
8
9
a) J. S. Bonifacino and L. M. Traub, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 2003,
7
2, 395; b) T. Braulke and J. S. Bonifacino, Biochim. Biophys.
Acta., 2009, 1793, 605.
a) W. J. Chen, J. L. Goldstein and M. S. Brown, J. Biol. Chem.,
1990, 265, 3116; b) M. S. Maginnis, B. A. Mainou, A. Derdowski,
E. M. Johnson, R. Zent and T. S. Dermody, J. Virol., 2008, 82,
fusions (7D12-P
1
2
and 7D12-P ) with significantly improved
lysosome-targeting properties. In addition, the synergistic effects of
NPGY motif and nona-arginine peptide were found to induce robust
internalization and lysosomal trafficking. When conjugated with a
microtubulin inhibitor (MMAF), 7D12-P demonstrated superior
2
cytotoxicity and anti-tumor activity. Further mechanism study 10 a) R. G. Kibbey, J. Rizo, L. M. Gierasch and R. G. Anderson, J. Cell
3
181; c) A. S. Beyer, B. von Einem, D. Schwanzar, I. E. Keller, A.
Hellrung, D. R. Thal, M. Ingelsson, A. Makarova, M. Deng, E. S.
Chhabra, C. Propper, T. M. Bockers, B. T. Hyman and C. A. von
Arnim, Neurobiol. Aging, 2012, 33, 732.
supports that clathrin-mediated pathway was more efficiently
engaged with an NPGY-type motif labeled at the C-terminus of
proteins. Overall, this present work provides a versatile and
promising design strategy to direct an ADC to lysosomes for payload
release, and may represent a unique and powerful approach for
developing lysosome-targeting protein therapeutics.
This work was funded by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (No. 21708051 to X.C. and No. 91853106 to
X.J.) and the Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and
Biol., 1998, 142, 59; b) G. He, S. Gupta, M. Yi, P. Michaely, H. H.
Hobbs and J. C. Cohen, J. Biol. Chem., 2002, 277, 44044; c) S. K.
Mishra, P. A. Keyel, M. J. Hawryluk, N. R. Agostinelli, S. C.
Watkins and L. M. Traub, EMBO J., 2002, 21, 4915.
1 J. F. Collawn, L. A. Kuhn, L. F. Liu, J. A. Tainer and I. S.
Trowbridge, EMBO J., 1991, 10, 3247.
12 a) A. Gross, H. Alborzinia, S. Piantavigna, L. L. Martin, S. Wolfl
and N. Metzler-Nolte, Metallomics, 2015, 7, 371; b) K. Melikov
and L. V. Chernomordik, Cell Mol. Life Sci., 2005, 62, 2739.
1
1
3 a) O. Trott and A. J. Olson, J. Comput. Chem., 2010, 31, 455; b)
H. Land and M. S. Humble, Methods Mol. Biol., 2018, 1685, 43.
Entrepreneurial Teams (2016ZT06Y337). X.J. thanks the Thousand 14 a) K. R. Schmitz, A. Bagchi, R. C. Roovers, P. M. van Bergen en
Young Talents Program for financial support. We gratefully
acknowledge Prof. Sidney Hecht (Arizona State University) for
insightful discussion and helpful suggestion for this manuscript. We
thank Prof. Xu-Dong Qu (Wuhan University) for the support of
YASARA in Molecular Docking.
Henegouwen and K. M. Ferguson, Structure, 2013, 21, 1214; b)
P. van Driel, M. C. Boonstra, M. D. Slooter, R. Heukers, M. A.
Stammes, T. J. A. Snoeks, H. S. de Bruijn, P. J. van Diest, A. L.
Vahrmeijer, P. M. P. van Bergen En Henegouwen, C. J. H. van de
Velde, C. Lowik, D. J. Robinson and S. Oliveira, J. Control
Release, 2016, 229, 93; c) P. B. van Driel, J. R. van der Vorst, F. P.
Verbeek, S. Oliveira, T. J. Snoeks, S. Keereweer, B. Chan, M. C.
Boonstra, J. V. Frangioni, P. M. van Bergen en Henegouwen, A.
L. Vahrmeijer and C. W. Lowik, Int. J. Cancer, 2014, 134, 2663.
5 a) M. W. Popp, J. M. Antos, G. M. Grotenbreg, E. Spooner and H.
L. Ploegh, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2007, 3, 707; b) C. P. Guimaraes, M.
D. Witte, C. S. Theile, G. Bozkurt, L. Kundrat, A. E. Blom and H. L.
Ploegh, Nat. Protoc., 2013, 8, 1787.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
1
4
| J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins