336
L. Gao et al.
characterized as 11a, 12a-epoxy-olean-28,
13b-olide, referring to the reported data of
11a, 12a-epoxy-3-O-b-D-glucuronopyra-
nosyl-olean-28, 13b-olide [6]. In HMBC
spectrum of 1 (Figure 2), the correlations of
11, 12-epoxy ring could be observed from
H-11 (dH 3.17) to C-10 (dC 36.6) and C-12
(dC 57.4), from H-12 (dH 3.32) to C-11
(dC 52.9) and C-14 (dC 41.0), from H-9
(dH 1.79) to C-11 (dC 52.9), and from H-18
(dH 2.61) with C-12 (dC 57.4); the
correlations of 28, 13-lactone ring could
be observed from H-15 (dH 1.09), H-18
(dH 2.61) and H-27 (dH 1.32) to C-13
(dC 87.7), from H-18 (dH 2.61) to C-28
(dC 179.0), respectively, thus confirming
the moiety connection of the aglycon.
Further, NOE relationships (Figure 2)
between H-11 at dH 3.17 and Me-25 at dH
1.01/Me-26 at dH 1.22 (Me-26), and
between H-12 at dH 3.32 and Me-26 at dH
1.22 convinced the a-configuration of the
epoxy ring. The presence of one sugar
could be deduced from its anomeric proton
signal at dH 4.90 (1H, d, J ¼ 7.5 Hz) and
anomeric carbon signal at dC 107.8
(Table 2). The b-anomeric configuration
of D-xylose unit was determined from its
3JH1,H2 coupling constants(7.5 Hz) [7]. The
linkage position of b-D-xylose was shown
to be at C-3 of the aglycon by detecting a
correlation from the anomeric proton at dH
4.90 (Xyl-1) to C-3 at dC 88.5 in the HMBC
spectrum (Figure 2). On acid hydrolysis
with 2 M CF3COOH, 1 afforded sugar
moiety that was identified as D-xylose
based on the gas chromatography (GC)
analysis of its chiral derivative [8]. The
structure of 1 was finally established as
11a, 12a-epoxy-3-O-b-D-xylopyranosyl-
olean-28, 13b-olide.
871 cm21 (epoxy). A detailed comparison
of the 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts of 2
with those of 1 revealed the same aglycon
moiety for both compounds, with differ-
ences of sugar moieties (Tables 1 and 2).
On acid hydrolysis with 2 M CF3COOH, 2
afforded sugar moieties as L-rhamnose and
D-xylose in the ratio of 1:2 based on the GC
analysis of its chiral derivative [8]. The 1H
and 13C NMR spectra of 2 exhibited three
sugar anomeric protons at dH 6.67 (1H, br
s), 5.46 (1H, d, J ¼ 7.5 Hz), 4.91 (1H, d,
J ¼ 7.0 Hz), with three anomeric carbon
signals at dC 101.7, 107.8, and 106.3
correspondingly. The methyl signal at dH
1.74 (3H, d, J ¼ 6.0 Hz) and dC 18.7 also
indicated the presence of a rhamnose. The
glycosylation shift of C-3 (dC 88.4)
revealed that 2 was a 3-monodesmosidic
glycoside. The identities of the oligo-
saccharide sequence were determined by
a combination of HSQC, HMBC, and
NOESY experiments (Table 2). Following
HMBC correlations could be observed:
from H-1 of the xylose (dH 4.91, inner) to
C-3 (dC 88.4) of the aglycon, H-1 (dH 6.67)
of rhamnose to C-2 (dC 77.2) of the xylose
(inner), and H-1 of another xylose (dH 5.46)
(terminal) to C-3 (dC 83.3) of rhamnose
(Figure 2). The b-configuration at the
anomeric positions of the xylose units was
3
determined from its JH1,H2 coupling
constants (7.0–8.0 Hz) [7], and the chemi-
cal shift of C-5 (dC 69.8) indicated the usual
a-configuration for the rhamnose unit [9].
These configurations were also confirmed
from the NOE relationships between H-1
and H-3 and between H-1 and H-5 of
monosaccharide moieties (Figure 2) [10].
The structure of 2 was thus established as
11a, 12a-epoxy-3-O-b-D-xylopyranosyl-
(1 ! 3)-a-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 ! 2)-b-
D-xylopyranosyl-olean-28, 13b-olide.
Compound 3 was obtained as a
white amorphous powder. The positive
HR-ESI-MS exhibited a pseudomolecular
ion peak at m/z 1051.5448 [M þ Na]þ,
corresponding to the molecular formula
of C52H84O20. The IR spectrum of 3
Compound 2 was obtained as a white
amorphous powder. The positive FTICR-
HR-ESI-MS exhibited a pseudomolecular
ion peak at m/z 903.4716 [M þ Na]þ,
corresponding to the molecular formula
of C46H72O16. The IR spectrum of 2
exhibited absorptions at 3418 cm21
(ZOH), 1770 cm21 (ester carbonyl), and