M. Łukaszewski et al. / Electrochimica Acta 52 (2007) 4560–4565
4565
lying metal, the properties of the resulting surface are those for
an electrode composed of the pure plated metal. It should be
stressed that our results are consistent with the data reported for
Rh wires by Rand and Woods [32], who using analytical tech-
niques confirmed metal dissolution during cycling voltammetry
in the oxygen region.
[9] C. Pallota, N.R. de Tacconi, A.J. Arvia, Electrochim. Acta 26 (1981) 261.
[10] C. Pallota, N.R. de Tacconi, A.J. Arvia, J. Electroanal. Chem. 159 (1983)
201.
[11] Z. Cataldi, R.O. Lezna, M.C. Giordano, A.J. Arvia, J. Electroanal. Chem.
261 (1988) 61.
[12] M.I. Florit, A.E. Bolza´n, A.J. Arvia, J. Electroanal. Chem. 394 (1995) 253.
[13] L. Salgado, H. Sa´nchez, C.R. Cabrera, R.J. Castro, Y. Meas, J. Solid State
Electrochem. 2 (1998) 405.
[14] L. Salgado, Y. Meas, G. Trejo, J. Solid State Electrochem. 7 (2002) 37.
[15] E. Me´ndez, A.N. Castro Luna, M.F. Cerda´, A.W. Mombru´, C.F. Zinola,
M.E. Martins, J. Solid State Electrochem. 7 (2003) 208.
[16] R.T.S. Oliveira, M.C. Santos, L.O.S. Bulho˜es, E.C. Pereira, J. Electroanal.
Chem. 569 (2004) 233.
From both CV and EQCM data the following picture can be
established concerning electrochemical behavior of thin poly-
crystallineRhlayersin0.5 MH2SO4. Withthepotentialincrease
fromthezerochargevalue(ca. 0.0 Vaccordingto[43])hydrogen
is desorbed from the surface which is accompanied by adsorp-
−
[17] M.C. Santos, R.T.S. Oliveira, E.C. Pereira, L.O.S. Bulho˜es, Thin Solid
Films 483 (2005) 164.
tion of HSO4 ions, whose maximum coverage reaches ca.
8% at ca. 0.4–0.5 V. At higher potentials oxidation of Rh pro-
ceeds including surface oxide formation and metal dissolution.
The composition of surface oxide corresponds to the formula
RhO and a monolayer coverage is attained at ca. 1.3–1.4 V. A
small fraction (3.5–6.5%, depending on scan rate applied) of a
monolayer of Rh surface atoms is dissolved in the electrolyte.
ˇ
ˇ
[18] K. Juodkazis, G. Stalnionis, B. Sebeka, V. Sukiene´, I. Savickaja, Russ. J.
Electrochem. 38 (2002) 1157.
[19] L. Salgado, G. Trejo, Y. Meas, T. Zayas, J. Solid State Electrochem. 10
(2006) 230.
[20] M. Vukovic´, J. Electroanal. Chem. 242 (1988) 97.
[21] I. Bakos, S. Szabo´, J. Electroanal. Chem. 547 (2003) 103.
[22] Wasberg, G. Hora´nyi, J. Electroanal. Chem. 381 (1995) 151.
[23] Wasberg, G. Hora´nyi, J. Electroanal. Chem. 386 (1995) 213.
[24] G. Hora´nyi, M. Wasberg, J. Electroanal. Chem. 404 (1996) 291.
[25] M. Wasberg, J. Ba´cskai, G. Inzelt, G. Hora´nyi, J. Electroanal. Chem. 418
(1996) 195.
4. Conclusions
Surface oxide formation on freshly electrodeposited Rh is
more irreversible than on electrochemically aged Rh. From the
analysis of the EQCM response it can be concluded that hydro-
gen desorption occurs simultaneously with the adsorption of
HSO4− ions, whose maximum surface coverage reaches ca. 8%.
RhO is suggested as the main species formed during Rh surface
oxidation. The EQCM experiments indicate Rh dissolution dur-
ing electrode polarization into potentials in the oxygen region.
The extent to which Rh dissolves increases with an increase in
electrode potential and a decrease in scan rate. At a potential
slightly lower than the oxygen evolution potential the amount of
dissolved metal at scan rate 0.05 V s−1 corresponds to ca. 4.5%
of monolayer of Rh surface atoms.
[26] G. Hora´nyi, M. Wasberg, J. Electroanal. Chem. 431 (1996) 161.
[27] V. Horvat-Radosˇevic´, K. Kvastek, Electrochim. Acta 48 (2002) 311.
[28] V. Horvat-Radosˇevic´, K. Kvastek, J. Electroanal. Chem. 566 (2004) 451.
[29] I.R. De Moraes, F.C. Nart, J. Br. Chem. Soc. 12 (2001) 138.
[30] P. Zelenay, G.G. Hora´nyi, C.K. Rhee, A. Wieckowski, J. Electroanal. Chem.
300 (1991) 499.
[31] G. Hora´nyi, E.M. Rizmayer, J. Electroanal. Chem. 201 (1986) 187.
[32] D.A.J. Rand, R. Woods, J. Electroanal. Chem. 35 (1972) 209.
[33] R. Schumacher, W. Helbig, I. Hass, M. Wu¨nsche, H. Meyer, J. Electroanal.
Chem. 354 (1993) 59.
[34] G. Sauerbrey, Z. Phys. 155 (1959) 206.
[35] M.C. Santos, D.W. Miwa, S.A.S. Machado, Electrochem. Commun. 2
(2000) 692.
[36] G. Jerkiewicz, G. Vatankhah, J. Lessard, M.P. Soriaga, Y.-S. Park, Elec-
trochim. Acta 49 (2004) 1451.
[37] M. Hachkar, T. Napporn, J.-M. Le´ger, B. Beden, C. Lamy, Electrochim.
Acta 41 (1996) 2721.
References
[38] W. Sto¨ckel, R. Schumacher, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 91 (1987) 345.
[39] F. Gloaguen, J.-M. Le´ger, C. Lamy, J. Electroanal. Chem. 467 (1999) 186.
[40] C.P. Wilde, S.V. De Cliff, K.C. Hui, D.J.L. Brett, Electrochim. Acta 45
(2000) 3649.
[41] R. Raudonis, D. Plausˇinaitis, V. Daujotis, J. Electroanal. Chem. 358 (1993)
351.
[42] V. Tsionsky, L. Daikhin, M. Urbakh, E. Gileadi, in: A.J. Bard, I. Rubinstein
(Eds.), Electroanalytical Chemistry. A Series of Advances, vol. 22, Marcel
Dekker, New York, 2004, p. 2.
[43] M.E. Martins, J. Argent. Chem. Soc. 93 (2005) 143.
[44] M. Tian, B.E. Conway, J. Electroanal. Chem. 581 (2005) 176.
[45] M. Tian, W.G. Pell, B.E. Conway, Electrochim. Acta 48 (2003) 2675.
[1] R. Woods, in: A.J. Bard (Ed.), Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 9, Marcel
Dekker, New York, 1976, p. 2.
[2] G. Jerkiewicz, in: A. Wie˛ckowski (Ed.), Interfacial Electrochemistry, Mar-
cel Dekker, New York, 1999, p. 559.
[3] R. Woods, J. Electroanal. Chem. 49 (1974) 217.
[4] D.A.J. Rand, R. Woods, J. Electroanal. Chem. 31 (1971) 29.
[5] M. Peuckert, Surf. Sci. 141 (1984) 500.
[6] G. Jerkiewicz, J.J. Borodzinski, Langmuir 9 (1993) 2202.
[7] G. Jerkiewicz, J.J. Borodzinski, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 90 (1994)
3669.
[8] F. Villiard, G. Jerkiewicz, Can. J. Chem. 75 (1997) 1656.