N. Kumari et al.
Bioorganic Chemistry 111 (2021) 104972
6.28 (1H, s), 5.07 (2H, brs), 3.78–3.71 (5H, m), 3.37–3.36 (2H, m), 2.97
(4H, s), 2.60 (4H, s), 1.72–1.65 (2H, m) and 1.51 (2H, s).
13C NMR (DMSO‑d6, 100.6 MHz): δ 154.5, 151.9, 145.9, 133.2,
131.41, 122.6, 120.8, 117.9, 111.9, 109.9, 107.0, 94.9, 55.3, 52.6, 41.0
and 24.9.
The characterization of 99mTc-EDHT was accomplished by
comparative studies after co-injection of the Re complexes and corre-
sponding 99mTc complexes at tracer level with HPLC analysis with
UV–vis and gamma detection. HPLC analysis was performed with a
reverse phase C18 column. The isocratic solvent CH3CN:H2O were used
in the ratio of 70:30 for 99mTc- EDHT.
HR-ESI-TOF-MS:
m/z
397.2230
([M+H]+),
calcd.
for
[C22H28N4O3+H]+ 297.22.
3.3. Glutathione challenge
• Synthesis of 2,2′-(ethane-1,2-diylbis((2-((3-(4-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)
piperazin-1-yl)butyl)-2-oxo-2,3-dihydrobenzo[d]oxazol-5-yl)
amino)-2-oxoethyl)azanediyl))diacetic acid (EDHT)
To test the 99mTc-EDHT stability, it’s challenged with Glutathione
within concentration range of 25 mM- 100 mM. Labelled compound was
incubated with solution mixture of glutathione in saline and percentage
of transcomplexation and labelled compound was determined at
different time interval by instant thin layer chromatography (ITLC).
A solution of compound 5 (0.35 g, 0.89 mmol) and Et3N (0.19 g, 1.9
mmol) in anhydrous DMF (10 mL) was stirred at room temperature.
EDTA dianhydride (0.10 g, 0.39 mmol) was added slowly to the reaction
mixture and was continued to stir at 50 ◦C for next 20 h. After finishing
of the starting material in reaction mixture, solvent was removed and
residue was redissolved in methanol and diethyl ether to get the pre-
cipitate. Achieved crude product was further dried under reduce vac-
uum to afford compound EDHT.
3.4. In-Vitro serum stability of 99mTc-EDHT
The radiolabeled drug 99mTc-EDHT was tested for its in-vitro serum
stability by ascending instant thin layer chromatography. For in-vitro
stability in physiological saline and serum, 100 µL of the radiolabel
was mixed with 2 mL each of 0.9% saline and serum. Instant thin layer
chromatography was carried out to assess the labeling efficiency after
incubating at 37 ◦C for 30 min. For in-vitro protein binding, 37 MBq of
99mTc-EDHT in 0.1 mL was mixed with 2 mL of plasma (n = 6). Aliquots
were taken at various time intervals and proteins were precipitated by
adding equal volumes of 12.5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and plasma.
The radioactivity in the precipitate and supernatant was measured in a
well type gamma counter.
Physical state and Yield: white solid, 80%
IR (KBr) νmax: 3394, 2361, 1593, 1435, 769 cmꢀ 1
1H NMR (DMSO‑d6, 400 MHz): δ 10.48 (2H, brs), 7.61 (2H, s),
7.30–6.79 (12H, m), 4.24 (25H, m), 3.73(12H, s), 3.41–3.35 (10H, m),
2.96–2.49 (6H, m) and 1.67–1.54 (8H, m).
13C NMR (DMSO‑d6, 100.6 MHz): δ 174.5, 170.0, 1154.5, 153.2,
141.2, 138.3, 136.1, 132.7, 134.4, 122.4, 122.6, 119.2, 110.3, 112.2,
109.7, 101.22, 66.20, 58.2, 55.3, 53.2, 49.6, 40.2, 25.6 and 23.2
HR-ESI-TOF-MS: m/z 1071.4904 ([M+Na]+), calcd. for
[C54H68N10O12+Na]+ 1071.49.
3.5. Blood kinetics
For in-vivo studies, 74 MBq of radiotracer was administered to the
rabbit and blood samples were withdrawn at various time intervals.
Drug was injected through the ear vein and blood samples were
collected at different time intervals post administration (n = 3). The
radioactivity in blood samples was measured in a well type gamma
counter and was calculated as percentage of the injected dose.
Formula used for Blood-clearance:
Reaction conditions: (i) CDI, THF, reflux, 3hrs; (ii) 1,4-dibromobu-
tane, K2CO3, acetone, reflux, 4hrs; (iii) arylpiperazine, K2CO3, acetoni-
trile, stirred at 0 ◦C, 3hrs (iv) Pd/C, MeOH, rt; (v) 4,4′-(ethane-1,2-diyl)
bis(morpholine-2,6-dione), Et3N, DMF, 50 ◦C
3.1. In vitro receptor binding assay
%Radioactivity in blood = (Counts *100 * Volume of blood)
(Weight of blood * Total counts injected)
In vitro receptor binding assay was performed through competitive
binding experiments by using [3H]-8-OH-DPAT as radioligand in
duplicate. Aliquots of volume 50
μ
L of rat hippocampal homogenates
3.6. Biodistribution
were mixed with 50
μ
L [3H]-8-OH-DPAT (0.180 nM) tris-HCl buffer (50
The animals were used from the experimental animal facility at the
Institute. The animals were fed laboratory chow pellets, in ad libitum
with free access to food and water. The animals were in the room with
daytime light and no light after 1900 h until morning with the tem-
perature of approx. 25 ◦C.
mM tris-HCl, 0.1% ascorbic acid, 2 mM CaCl2 at pH7.5) and 50 μL of
increasing concentrations of competing EDHT and its Re complex.
Nonspecific binding was defined with 10 μM 8-OH-DPAT. The mixture
was incubated for 20 min at 37 ◦C and then bound and free radioligand
was separated by filtration and resoaked with 1% bovine serum albumin
(BSA). It was washed three times with 3 mL of ice cold tris-HCl buffer
(50 mM tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl) and dried over for 10 min, then placed
in a 2 mL scintillation cocktail. The results of competitive experiments
were analyzed to obtain the IC50 values.
In-vivo distribution of 99mTc-EDHT was studied in 2 months old
BALB/c mice (n = 3; each weighing approximately 22 g). An aliquot of
100 µL of 99mTc-EDHT (3.7 MBq) was administered intravenously to
each mouse, weighing about 25 g, through the tail vein. The animals
were sacrificed at different time intervals and different organs were
removed, collected into preweighed tubes. The radioactivity in each
organ was counted using well-type gamma spectrometer and Counts per
minute (CPM) values were decay-corrected and results were calculated
as % ID per gram of wet tissue. All animal studies were approved by the
institutional Experimental Animal Ethical Committee and performed in
accordance with their guidelines.
3.2. Radiolabeling of EDHT
The radiolabelling of EDHT is performed by using sodium pertech-
nate as labeling reagent and SnCl2 as a reducing agent. In summary,
EDHT was dissolved in water, then 1 N HCl solution of 50 mg
SnCl2⋅2H2O was added to the solution and the pH was adjusted to 7.0.
After filtration through a 0.22
μm millipore filter and lyophilized. An
Formula for biodistribution studies:
eluate of 1 mL Na99mTcO4 was added to a lyophilized kit. The labelling
efficiency was more than 98%. The radiochemical purity of 99mTc-EDHT
was determined by ascending instant thin layer chromatography (ITLC)
using silica gel coated fibre glass sheets (Pall Corporation) and dual
solvent systems, namely (a) 100% acetone and (b) a solvent mixture of
Ethanol, Ammonia and Water (2:1:5 v/v) as mobile phases. The radio-
active contaminants were identified as reduced/hydrolyzed (R/H) 99mTc
(Rf = 0.0) and free 99mTc-pertechnetate (Rf = 1.0) and the labeled
product remained at the point of application when 100% acetone alone
was used as mobile phase.
% Injected Dose per Gram Organ = (Counts * 100)
(Wt of organ* Total counts injected)
3.7. SPECT imaging of 99mTc-EDHT
SPECT whole body scintigraphic scan was carried out after intrave-
nous administration of 40 MBq of radiolabeled EDHT in normal New
Zealand rabbit through the dorsal ear vein. The animal was anaes-
thetized by intramuscular injection of diazepam 10 min before imaging.
The animal was fixed on a board in supine position and imaging was
performed using Single Photon Emission Computerized Tomography
4