Chemistry Letters 2001
1079
hydrosilyl complex Cp*(PMe3)2RuSiHPh2.12 In order to clarify a
potential reactivity of the neutral silylene complex C toward
hydride described above, the reaction of C with LiAlH4 was exam-
ined. When LiAlH4 was added to a THF-d8 solution of C, the clean
formation of 4 was shown by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Similar reac-
tion of 1 with LiAlH4 also afforded 4, and it was isolated as an air-
sensitive white solid in 56% yield based on 5 from the photolysis of
5 and Ph2SiH2 in THF followed by treatment of the resulting sily-
lene complex C with LiAlH4 in ether. We are currently exploring
the reactivity of 4 as a precursor to a variety of hydrido(hydrosilyl)
tungsten complexes.
phosphine favors IHI in complexes of the type Cp*(PR3)RuH2Si-
R2Cl,10b the existence of π-acidic CO ligands probably disfavors
IHI in 2.
When 2 was treated with excess LiAlH4 in THF-d8 to reduce
the Si–Cl bond, a rapid reaction took place to give the anionic com-
plex Li[cis-Cp*(CO)2HWSiHPh2] (4)3 (Scheme 1), showing WH
and SiH signals at –7.16 (1JWH = 73.6 Hz) and 5.35 (1JSiH = 160.1
Hz) ppm, respectively, in the 1H NMR spectrum. Its anionic char-
acter is supported by the 183 cm–1 difference in the average CO
stretching frequencies between 4 (1867 and 1717 cm–1, νav = 1792
cm–1) and the neutral complex 2 (2006 and 1944 cm–1, νav = 1975
cm–1).
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (No. 10640536) from the Ministry of Education, Science,
Sports, and Culture of Japan.
Dedicated to Prof. Hideki Sakurai on the occasion of his 70th
birthday.
References and Notes
1
2
3
H. Wada, H. Tobita, and H. Ogino, Organometallics, 16, 2200 (1997)
and references therein.
H. Sakaba, M. Tsukamoto, T. Hirata, C. Kabuto, and H. Horino, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 122, 11511 (2000).
1
Selected data: 2: H NMR (400 MHz, C7D8) δ 7.92–7.90 (m, 4H, Ph),
7.25–7.21 (m, 4H, Ph), 7.14–7.10 (m, 2H, Ph), 1.75 (s, 15H, Cp*),
–6.35 (br s, 2H, WH); 29Si NMR (C7D8, –60 °C) δ 23.0; IR (toluene)
νCO = 2006 (s), 1944 (s) cm–1; Anal. Calcd for C24H27ClO2SiW: C,
1
48.46; H, 4.57%. Found: C, 48.54; H, 4.77%. 4: H NMR (400 MHz,
THF-d8) δ 7.65 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.6 Hz, 4H, Ph), 7.01 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H,
Ph), 6.94 (tt, J = 7.5, 1.6 Hz, 2H, Ph), 5.35 (d, J = 1.1 Hz, 1JSiH = 160.1
Hz, 1H, SiH), 1.92 (s, 15H, Cp*), –7.16 (s, 1JWH = 73.6 Hz, 1H, WH);
29Si NMR (THF-d8) δ 29.5; IR (toluene) = 1867 (s), 1717 (s) cm–1. A:
1H NMR (400 MHz, THF-d8, –60 °C) δ 7.87 (s, 2H, Ph), 7.55 (s, 2H,
Ph), 7.14 (s, 2H, Ph), 7.00 (s, 4H, Ph), 1.89 (s, 15H, Cp*), –8.03 (s,
1JWH = 68.2 Hz, 1H, WH); 29Si NMR (THF-d8, –60 °C) δ 69.5. C: 1H
NMR (400 MHz, THF-d8) δ 7.39 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.6 Hz, 4H, Ph),
Possible mechanisms for the formation of 4 are shown in
Scheme 1. Path a is a sequence of deprotonation of the tungsten
hydride of 2 and chloride/hydride exchange in the resulting anionic
intermediate A, and path b is the reversed combination of these two
processes via B. The third pathway is E2 elimination to produce
silylene complex C followed by hydride attack to the electrophilic
silylene center of C. To get mechanistic information, the reaction
1
7.20–7.13 (m, 6H, Ph), 1.84 (s, 15H, Cp*), –9.31 (s, JWH = 68.7 Hz,
1H, WH); 29Si NMR (THF-d8) δ 119.3; IR (THF) νCO = 1896 (s), 1809
(m) cm–1. In each 13C NMR spectrum of 4 and A, two CO signals are
observed, indicating their cis configurations.
1
was monitored by low-temperature H NMR spectroscopy.
Interestingly, the reaction slowly proceeded around –70 °C to form
an intermediate, which is characterized as the deprotonation product
Li[cis-Cp*(CO)2HWSiClPh2] (A)3 from the observation of WH
(–8.03 ppm, 1JWH = 68.2 Hz, 1H) and Cp* (1.89 ppm, 15H) signals,
and occurrence of the deprotonation is supported by detection of a
signal at 4.56 ppm assigned to H2. The 29Si signal is observed at
69.5 ppm at –60 °C. When the temperature was raised above –45
°C, the signals due to A decreased and those of the final product 4
became predominant.
Although the observation of the WH and Cp* signals with an
intensity ratio 1:15 for the intermediate is not inconsistent with the
silylene complex C, such a possibility is ruled out by comparison of
the spectroscopic data of the intermediate with those of C synthe-
sized by photolysis of Cp*(CO)3WMe (5) and Ph2SiH2 in THF-d8,
showing characteristic 1H and 29Si signals at –9.31 ppm (W–H) and
119.3 ppm (W=Si).3 These results clearly demonstrate that 4 is pro-
duced from 2 via path a.
4
5
H. Jacobsen and T. Ziegler, Inorg. Chem., 35, 775 (1996).
No decoalescence of the hydride signal was observed on cooling down
to –80 °C. In the low-temperature NMR experiments, very weak hydride
signals of trace amounts of minor components were detected. Although
their structures cannot be characterized, the interconversion between 2
and the minor components might cause the dynamic behavior.
6
7
J. Y. Corey and J. Braddock-Wilking, Chem. Rev., 99, 175 (1999).
The formation of 2-d2 is also suggested by the relative intensity of the
Cp* signal to the combined hydride signals of 2-d and 2 (ca. 13:1), which
is larger than a 10.9:1 ratio expected for a 1:0.6 mixture of 2-d and 2 only.
Although it is suggested that the H/D scrambling might be promoted by a
catalytic amount of pyridine liberated from 1 by the fact that addition of
pyridine to a mixture of 2 and 2-d2 in toluene-d8 led to the rapid forma-
tion of 2-d, detailed studies are required to clarify the mechanism.
JHD coupling constants for η2-H2 complexes are in the range of 20–34
Hz: R. H. Crabtree, “The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition
Metals,” 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2001), p 73.
Crystal data for 2: C24H27ClO2SiW, MW= 594.86, monoclinic, space
group P21/a (No. 14), a = 16.067(3), b = 8.901(2), c = 16.856(3) Å, β =
99.64(1)°, V = 2376.7(8) Å3, Z = 4, Dcalc = 1.662 g/cm3, µ(Mo Kα) =
50.45 cm–1, R = 0.021 (Rw = 0.021) for 5594 observed reflections [I >
5.00σ(I)]. All Hydrogens were found from successive D-Fourier syn-
theses, in which W–H atoms were assigned geometrically out of several
peaks around W atom, and all hydrogens were refined isotropically.
However, no detailed discussion about W–H bonds is made here
because of the low accuracy.
8
9
10 a) G. I. Nikonov, L. G. Kuzmina, S. F. Vyboishchikov, D. A.
Lemenovskii, and J. A. K. Howard, Chem. Eur. J., 5, 2947 (1999). b) S.
B. Duckett, L. G. Kuzmina, and G. I. Nikonov, Inorg. Chem. Commun.,
3, 126 (2000).
Despite of the electrophilic nature of the silylene center of a
silylene complex, a reactivity study of an isolated silylene complex
toward a hydride reagent is rare. To our knowledge, the only pre-
ceeding example is the reaction of the cationic silylene complex
Cp*(PMe3)2Ru=SiPh2(NCMe)+ with LiAlH4 to form the neutral
11 Bond lengths for complexes of the type Cp(*)(CO)2(L)WSiR3: see ref 2.
12 D. A. Straus, C. Zhang, G. E. Quimbita, S. D. Grumbine, R. H. Heyn,
T. D. Tilley, A. L. Rheingold, and S. J. Geib, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112,
2673 (1990).