aldehydes remains challenging and difficult. Recently, we
have developed a direct and convenient synthesis of imines
from bipyridine frameworks where the aldehyde function is
Scheme 1
1
0
masked in the form of a gem-dibromomethyl derivative.
Interestingly, the selective oxidation of a single primary
alcohol in 2,6-di(hydroxymethyl)pyridine is possible but
remains difficult and feasible only under harsh conditions.
2
Typical literature procedures utilize SeO (0.5 equiv) in
refluxing pyridine.11 This is a major problem due to the
toxicity, cost, product purity, and low isolated yields. In our
hands, this was a significant issue that could not be overcome
by manipulating the reaction and purification conditions. We
desired conditions that would be practical, inexpensive,
environmentally friendly, and amenable to large-scale syn-
thesis and that allow for substrate generality.
The use of other metal reagents or catalysts has been
developed to address this issue. Manganese dioxide has
proved a valuable oxidizing agent for certain functional
1
2
groups. This reagent oxidizes many compounds smoothly.
However, we noticed that 2,6-di(hydroxymethyl)pyridine was
doubly oxidized to the bisaldehydes in acceptable yield, but
at that time no characterized side products were mentioned
and the exact nature of the manganese dioxide was not
1
3
given. Despite these advances, there still remained a need
for a general protocol that would efficiently broaden the
scope of this important oxidation reaction. In this Letter, we
disclose the results of using manganese dioxide for the
selective mono-oxidation of oligopyridine carrying dihy-
droxymethyl functions.
2
Next, we chose to better characterize the MnO by
determining the specific surface, the nature of the phase (by
X-ray powder diffraction), and the morphology. First, we
were pleased to discover that the MnO
surface area of 3.8 m /g and a much better resolved dif-
2
(P) sample has a low
2
Initial results revealed that a sample of MnO
2
(P) from
2
fraction pattern when compared to MnO
The first sample, MnO (P), exhibits some sharp diffraction
lines that can be attributed unambiguously to the Pyrolusite
2
(M) (46.7 m /g).
Rh oˆ ne Poulenc (Prolabo no. 25 259.296) in a stoichiometric
ratio with the starting material was weakly active and only
2
provided the monoxidized derivative 1 in CHCl
3
at 60 °C.
1
4
phase (SI). The second sample, MnO
and broad diffraction peaks emerging from the background
that are attributed to a ꢀ-MnO Akhtenskite phase (SI).
2
(M), exhibits weak
However, a sample of MnO (M) from Merck (no. 805958)
2
was very active and provided solely the di-oxidized com-
pounds. After some experimentation, we were pleased to find
that we could isolate compound 1 in 70% using a large excess
2
Furthermore, the morphology of the two manganese oxide
samples has been characterized using scanning electron
of MnO
ridine derivatives as depicted in Scheme 1. The best solvent
is CHCl , which gives a correct balance between the
2
(P) and extend the protocol to a family of oligopy-
microscopy. For MnO
larger than tens of microns are observed (Figure 1, top),
whereas the second sample [MnO (M)] is composed of
2
(P), platelet-like crystallites with sizes
3
2
solubility of the products, the kinetics of the reaction, and
the selectivity. In all cases the formation of the bisaldehydes
is negligible (<5%) and the unreacted compounds could be
easily recycled. The presence of oxygen is not mandatory
for the oxidation, and lower temperatures provide lower
yields for the oxidation. We also noticed that the use of other
solvents such as dichloromethane, pyridine, or acetone and
ultrasonic irradiation do not significantly improved the yields.
aggregates of a mixture of irregular shaped grains and needles
of a few nanometers (Figure 1, bottom).
There is a close relation between the morphology of the
crystallites, the specific surface area, and the activity of the
material. The larger crystals have a lower surface area and
better resolved diffraction patterns but also a weaker oxida-
tion capability, leading specifically to the mono-oxidized
2
compounds. The more dispersed MnO (M) material is less
(
9) (a) Small, B. L.; Brookhart, M.; Bennett; A. M. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 4049. (b) Small, B. L.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
998, 120, 7143. (c) Britovsek, G. J. P.; Gibson, V. C.; Kimberley, B. S.;
crystallized, more dispersed, and consequently more active
toward primary alcohol oxidation, and in this case double
oxidation is always evidenced with 2,6-di(hydroxymethyl)-
pyridine. Preparation of the active MnO Pyrolusite phase
2
could be achieved according to literature procedures.15
1
Maddox, P. J.; McTavish, S. J.; Solan, G. A.; White, A. J. P.; Williams, D.
J.; Bruce, M.; Mastroianni, S.; Redshaw, C.; Str o¨ mberg, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 8728.
(10) Weibel, N.; Charbonni e` re, L.; Ziessel, F. R. J. Org Chem. 2002,
6
7, 7876.
(
(
11) Mathes, W.; Sauermilch, W. Chem. Ber. 1956, 89, 1515.
12) (a) Attenburrow, J.; Cameron, A. F. B.; Chapman, J. H.; Evan, R.
M.; Hems, B. A.; Jansen, A. B. A.; Walker, T. J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 1094.
(14) Hill, L. I.; Verbaere, A.; Guyomard, D. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003,
150, 135 and references therein.
(15) Hill, L. I.; Verbaere, A.; Guyomard, D. J. Power Sources 2003,
119-121, 226.
(
b) Lou, J.-D.; Xu, Z.-N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6149.
13) Papadopoulos, E. P.; Jarrar, A.; Issidorides, C. H. J. Org Chem.
966, 31, 615.
(
1
2866
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 17, 2004