A. Reichenberg et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 1257–1260
1259
able to that of the commonlyused ligands, IPP and
pamidronate), suggesting that the extensive bioactivity
of HMB-PP resides mainlyin the p yr ophosphate moi-
ety. This is in agreement with comparable data on
methylenediphosphonate analogues of a synthetic gd T
cell activator, bromohydrin pyrophosphate (EC =10
4. (a) Allison, T. J.; Winter, C. C.; Fournie
´
, J. J.; Bonneville,
M.; Garboczi, D. N. Nature 2001, 411, 820. (b) Morita, C. T.;
Lee, H. K.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; Mariuzza, R. A.; Tanaka, Y. J.
Immunol. 2001, 167, 36.
5
. Belmant, C.; Espinosa, E.; Halary, F.; Tang, Y.; Peyrat,
M.; Sicard, H.; Kozikowski, A.; Buelow, R.; Poupot, R.;
Bonneville, M.; Fournie, J. J. FASEB J. 2000, 14, 1669.
. NMR-spectra were recorded on Bruker DRX 500 and AM
5
0
´
nM), with the PCP derivative having a bioactivityof
5
6
4
>> 12 mM. Even more, in the same publication
1
13
00 spectrometers. H- and C NMR spectra in D O were
2
dephosphorylation-resistant analogues of synthetic
activators were described as competitive antagonists,
with IC50 values ranging from 10 mM to 1 mM. How-
ever, the IC50 values of these compounds were 3–4
magnitudes higher than the EC50 values of the corre-
sponding agonists, thus raising doubts about the inhib-
itoryspecificityof the antagonism observed. Indeed, in
our hands the putative antagonist HMB-PCP showed
no inhibitoryactivityat all, whether titrated in the pre-
sence of a given concentration of the agonist HMB-PP, or
in the reciprocal experiment, when added at a fixed con-
centration to a serial dilution of HMB-PP (not shown).
referenced to internal 3-trimethylsilyl propionic acid sodium
salt (0.0 ppm and 1.7 ppm, respectively), or tetramethylsilane
in CDCl , proton-decoupled P NMR to external phosphoric
3
acid (0.0 ppm). (E)-4-(tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy-3-methyl-
but-2-enoic acid ethylester, (E)-2. To a suspension of 2.40 g (60
mmol) NaH in 40 mL of dryTHF under argon was dropped a
3
1
solution of 8.97
phonoacetate in 15 mL of dryTHF at 0 C. After 1 h at 0 C,
.53 g (40 mmol) of tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy-propanone 1
Choo, H. Y.; Peak, K. H.; Park, J.; Kim, D. H.; Chung, H. S.
g (40 mmol) ethyl P,P-diethylphos-
ꢁ
ꢁ
7
(
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 35, 643) in 15 mL of dryTHF were
ꢁ
added, and stirring was continued for 15 min at 0 C and 2 h
at rt. Workup was carried out byslow addition of 50 mL of
4
saturated NH Cl solution, followed by10 mL of water and 30
Taken together, while for a number of synthetic com-
pounds the gd T cell stimulatorycapacitywas attributed
to their strong chemical reactivity, this seems not the
mL of ether. The aqueous layer was separated and extracted
with a further 30 mL of ether. The combined organic layers
were washed with two 30 mL portions of saturated NaCl
5
2 4
solution, dried with Na SO , and released from the solvent by
case for the comparablyinert natural activator, HMB-
PP. Consistently, quantitative structure–activity rela-
tionship analyses rather identified the presence of two
negative ionizable groups, an H-bond donor, and a
hydrophobic group as the most important features to
rotaryevaporation under reduced pressure to yi eld a crude E/
Z-mixture [(E)-2:(Z)-2=80:20; GC analysis], which was sepa-
rated byflash chromatographyon silica gel with n-hexane/tert-
butylmethylether (90:10) as eluent to yield 7.03 g (61%) of the
1
pure desired E-isomer (E)-2: H NMR (CDCl /TMS), d: 0.09
3
2
b
make a good gd T cell activator. Yet, this model still
does not consider the striking difference in the bioactiv-
ity between bromohydrin pyrophosphate and its imido-
(s, 6H, Si(CH ) ); 0.93 (s, 9H, SiC(CH ) ); 1.29 (t, 3H, J=7.1
3
2
3 3
Hz, CH
2H, CH
2
CH
3
); 2.05 (s (broad), 3H, C¼CCH
3
); 4.11 (s (broad),
CH ); 5.99 (s
C NMR (CDCl /TMS), d:ꢀ5.4
OSi); 4.17 (q, 2H, J=7.1 Hz, CH
2
2
3
1
3
5
(broad), 1H, C¼CH).
diphosphate analogue (EC =12 mM), or between
3
5
0
(
Si(CH
(SiC(CH
3
)
2
); 14.4 (CH
2
CH
3
); 15.4 (C¼CCH
3
); 18.4
OSi);
HMB-PP and HMB-PCP (Table 1). While the proposed
5
3
)
3
); 25.9 (SiC(CH
3
)
3
); 59.6 (CH
2
CH ) 67.1 (CH
3
2
need for a hydrolysable pyrophosphate moiety may
1
1
13.4 (C¼CH) 157.1 (C¼CH); 167.1 (C¼O). (Z)-2 isomer: H
NMR (CDCl /TMS), d: 0.08 (s, 6H, Si(CH ); 0.91 (s, 9H,
SiC(CH ); 1.27 (t, 3H, J=7.1 Hz, CH CH ); 1.97 (s (broad),
H, C¼CCH ); 4.13 (q, 2H, J=7.1 Hz, CH CH ); 4.79 (s
explain the relativelylow bioactivities of the aminobi-
sphosphonates, alendronate and pamidronate, our own
data indicate that the bridging oxygen atom between the
two negative ionizable groups is clearlyimportant for
maximum activity.
3
3 2
)
3
)
3
2
3
3
3
2
3
13
(
broad), 2H, CH OSi); 5.67 (s (broad), 1H, C¼CH).
C
2
NMR (CDCl /TMS), d: ꢀ5.4 (Si(CH ) ); 14.3 (CH CH ); 18.3
3
3 2
2
3
(
SiC(CH
3
)
3
); 21.4 (C=CCH
3
); 25.9 (SiC(CH
3
)
3
); 59.7
(
CH CH ) 62.7 (CH OSi); 115.0 (C=CH) 160.8 (C=CH);
2 3 2
1
66.1 (C¼O). (E)-4-(tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy-3-methyl-but-
Acknowledgements
2-en-1-ol, 3. In a 50 mL flask were placed 0.891 g (3.45 mmol)
of (E)-2 in 10 mL of drytoluene under argon and cooled to
¨
This studywas supported bythe Bundesministerium fu r
ꢁ
ꢀ
78 C. After dropping 8.6 mL (8.6 mmol, 1 M in hexane) of
ꢁ
Bildung und Forschung (BioChance 0312588). We
gratefullyacknowledge the help of Ute Bahr, Ewald
Beck, Ruth Gschwind, Irina Steinbrecher, Stefanie
Wagner and Jochen Wiesner.
DIBAH into this solution, the temperature was kept at ꢀ78 C
ꢁ
ꢁ
for 2 h, then raised to 0 C during 1 h, and held at 0 C for 30
min. Addition of 1 mL of methanol and 10 mL of saturated
sodium potassium tartrate solution formed a white gelatinous
precipitate, which was stirred for 1 h at rt prior to adding 10 mL
of water and 30 mL of ether. The aqueous layer was separated
and extracted twice more, each with 30 mL of ether. The com-
References and Notes
4
bined organic layers were dried with MgSO , filtered and the
1
. Bukowski, J. F.; Morita, C. T.; Tanaka, Y.; Bloom, B. R.;
Brenner, M. B.; Band, H. J. Immunol. 1995, 154, 998.
. (a) Espinosa, E.; Belmant, C.; Sicard, H.; Poupot, R.;
Bonneville, M.; Fournie, J. J. Microbes Infect. 2001, 3, 645. (b)
Gossman, W.; Oldfield, E. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 4868.
. (a) Hintz, M.; Reichenberg, A.; Altincicek, B.; Bahr, U.;
solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield the crude
product quantitatively, which was used in the next step without
1
2
further purification. H NMR (CDCl /TMS), d: 0.07 (s, 6H,
3
´
Si(CH
C¼CCH
Hz, CH
)
); 0.92 (s, 9H, SiC(CH
), 4.03 (s (broad), 2H, CH
OH); 5.66 (dq, 1H, J =6.9 Hz, J
)
); 1.64 (s (broad), 3H,
3
2
3
3
3
2
OSi); 4.18 (d, 2H, J=6.9
3
2
1
2
=1.4 Hz, C¼CH).
1
3
Gschwind, R. M.; Kollas, A. K.; Beck, E.; Wiesner, J.; Eberl,
M.; Jomaa, H. FEBS Lett. 2001, 509, 317. (b) Eberl, M.;
Altincicek, B.; Kollas, A. K.; Sanderbrand, S.; Bahr, U.;
Reichenberg, A.; Beck, E.; Wiesner, J.; Hintz, M.; Jomaa, H.
Immunology 2002, 106, 200.
C NMR (CDCl /TMS), d: ꢀ5.6 (Si(CH ) ); 13.5 (C¼CCH );
3
3 2
3
18.4 (SiC(CH
(CH
) ); 25.7 (SiC(CH ) ); 58.9 (CH OH); 67.8
3 3 3 3 2
2
OSi); 123.0 (C¼CH); 137.9 (C¼CH). (E)-4-Hydroxy-3-
methyl-but-2-enyl methylenediphosphonate, HMB-PCP. To a
solution of 0.430 g (1.987 mmol) 3 in 10 mL of dryCH Cl at
2
2