addition of the branched R-halo esters to ketones revealed
5
,6
the difficulty in achieving good diastereoselectivity, e.g.,
Table 1. Indium-Based Diastereoselective Reformatsky-type
Reaction of Ketones 5 with 6a-ca
6
5a
Zn dust/I
and low-valent tantalum (ds 17:13).
Taking an impetus from the recently advancing selective
2
(anti/syn 3:2), Et
2
Zn/RhCl(PPh
)
3 3
(anti/syn 1:1),
5b
4,7
reactions based on indium, we envisioned the indium-based
diastereoselective Reformatsky-type reactions of ketones. We
herein report our investigations on the stereoselective C-C
bond formations using In or In(I)X.
The scope and result of the reactions of the branched
R-halo ester derivatives such as 6a-c with ketones in the
Reformatsky-type condition and the degree of stereoselection
would depend on two essential things: (a) a large difference
in steric demand between the two substituents on the carbonyl
carbon of ketones and (b) the strict conformation of a six-
membered cyclic transition state that would result from a
transient indium enolate (“E” or “Z”). In an initial experi-
ment, to a mixture of acetophenone and ethyl 2-bromopro-
pionate in dry THF was added indium metal powder at room
temperature, and the resulting mixture was heated to reflux
to afford the product 7a5 in 98% yield with diastereose-
lectivity of 75:25 (anti/syn) (Table 1, entry a). We found
that dipping the flask containing all the contents in dry THF
into a preheated bath for 1 h gave the product with higher
selectivity 84:16 (anti/syn) (entry b). Then we were interested
in employing the indium(I) halides for the above stereose-
lective reaction. Indium(I) bromide is found to be more
efficient than indium(I) chloride or indium(I) iodide. Em-
ploying indium(I) bromide gave significantly higher dia-
steroselectivity with very good yield. The generality of this
important stereoselective reaction was demonstrated with a
variety of ketones as summarized in Table 1. Electron-
withdrawing and donating groups slightly altered the dia-
stereoselectivities. The reactions with the R-halo ester
derivative 6c having a long carbon chain length also afforded
the products 7c and 10c with high diastereoselectivities
,6
(
entries j, k, and q). Employing other conditions such as
ultrasonication/rt, solvents such as MeCN and DMF, or using
4
,7
MeCH(Cl)COOEt or RX/NaI -in DMF/rt systems were
ineffective. Compared to the existing methods, the indium-
8
based reagents behaved in a distinctive manner with respect
9
a
to the diastereoselectivity.
a
In all reactions, 5 (1 mmol), 6a-c (1.6-1.8 mmol), In/In(I)X (∼1.2
Stereochemistry. We have isolated both the major and
minor isomers in pure form in some cases. The ester
derivatives (of alcohols) of major isomers 9a
mmol), and dry THF (∼2 mL) were used. Ratios of anti/syn isomers are
b
shown in parentheses. See the Supporting Information for the details of
9c c
methods A-C.
The contents of the reaction mixture were dipped into
1
and 13a
1
were
a preheated bath at reflux temperature (∼66-69 °C). 5a (1 mmol), 6c (2
mmol), and indium (2 mmol) were used. e Isolated as a mixture of
diastereomers.
d
(
4) For recent reviews, see: (a) Cintas, P. Synlett 1995, 1087. (b) Podlech,
J.; Maier, T. C. Synthesis 2003, 633. (c) Nair, V.; Ros, S.; Jayan, C. N.;
Pillai, B.; S. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 1959. (d) Chan, T. H.; Li, C.-J.; Lee,
M. C.; Wei, Z. Y. Can. J. Chem. 1994, 72, 1181.
9
b
(5) (a) Kanai, K.; Wakabayashi, H.; Honda, T. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2549
prepared according to the literature method in the crystalline
forms, suitable for the X-ray structure analyses. The stereo-
and references therein. (b) Aoyagi, Y.; Tanaka, W.; Ohta, A. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1994, 1225. (c) Delaunay, J.; Orliac-Le Moing, A.;
Simonet, J. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 7089. (d) Canceill, J.; Basselier, J. J.;
Jacques, J. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1967, 1024.
(8) For early works dealing with nondiastereoselective Reformatsky-type
reactions, see: (a) Chao, L.-C.; Rieke, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 2253.
(b) Nair, V.; Jayan, C. N.; Ros, S. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9453. (c) Araki,
S.; Ito, H.; Butsugan, Y. Synth. Commun. 1988, 18, 453. (d) Araki, S.;
Katsumura, N.; Kawasaki, K.-I.; Butsugan, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1991, 499. (e) Schick, H.; Ludwig, R.; Schwarz, K.-H.; Kleiner, K.;
Kunath, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1191. (f) Araki, S.;
Katsumura, N.; Kawasaki, K.; Butsugan, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1991, 499. (g) Yi, X.-H.; Meng, Y.; Li, C.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
4731.
(
6) Ross, N. A.; Bartsch, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 360 and
references therein.
7) For some recent papers, see: (a) Kumar, S. Kaur, P. Tetrahedron
(
Lett. 2004, 45, 3413. (b) Loh, T.-P.; Yin, Z.; Song, H.-S.; Tan, K.-L.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 911. (c) Yi, X.-H.; Meng, Y.; Li, C.-J. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 449. (d) Hirashita, T.; Kamei, T.; Satake, M.;
Horie, T.; Shimizu, H.; Araki, S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3799. (e)
Babu, S. A.; Yasuda, M.; Shibata, I., Baba, A. Synlett 2004, 1223. (f)
Paquette, L., A. Synthesis 2003, 765.
4476
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 24, 2004