noticeable that with both catalysts having a similar pore
structure, acid content and strength, the organic–inorganic
hybrid TiPPh-butylamine catalyst has a higher yield (+5.9%)
than the purely inorganic TiP-butylamine catalyst, which
might be explained by the strong affinity between the organic
motifs in the hybrid network of titanium phosphonates and
the substrates.2,15 The conc. HCl catalyst showed the yield of
26.2% after refluxing for 3 h; but by extending the refluxing
time to 18 h, the yield while using the HCl catalyst could be
increased to 50%,14 similar to the yield while using the
TiPPh-butylamine catalyst after refluxing for 3 h (48.7%),
which indicated the high reaction rate by using phosphonate-
based catalysts. After 10-time reuse, the product yield was
hardly decreased (Fig. S2, ESIw). Thus the TiPPh-butylamine
material was proved to be an efficient acid catalyst with
desirable stability and good recyclability, which could replace
the conventional acid catalysts like conc. HCl and acidic
resins in this reaction shorten the reaction time and over-
come disadvantages of homogeneous catalysts such as
being difficult to separate and recover and harmful to the
environment.
Fig. 3 SEM (a) and TEM (b) images of the TiPPh-butylamine
material.
some homogenous catalysts such as H2SO4 and HCl
(Scheme S1, ESIw).14 Porous titanium phosphate (TiP-butylamine)
was also synthesized with the use of phosphoric acid instead of
DTPMPA in the presence of n-butylamine. TiPPh-butylamine,
TiP-butylamine, TiPPh-non, previously reported ordered
mesoporous titanium phosphonates constructed by ethylene-
diamine tetra(methylene phosphonic acid) (PMTP-1),4
commercial acidic resin NKC-9 and concentrated HCl
(conc. HCl) were all tested for a 3 h reaction (Table 1). A
scarce product was obtained when catalyzed by TiPPh-non
and PMTP-1 due to their low acid content (2.54 and
2.93 mmol gÀ1) and acid strength (H0 4 À8.20, Table S1,
ESIw). However, with the assistance of alkyl amines, both the
acid contents of TiPPh-butylamine (5.76 mmol gÀ1) and
TiP-butylamine (5.71 mmol gÀ1), and the acid strength
(H0 o À8.20) were increased, leading to high yields of 48.7
and 42.8% for methyl-2,3-o-isopropylidene-b-D-ribofurano-
side, respectively. The yields were even higher than that of
NKC-9 (33.0%) with the acid content of 4.33 mmol gÀ1, which
could be attributed to the low surface area of NKC-9
(12 m2 gÀ1). Thus under the present experimental conditions,
the catalytic ability of these solid acids was not only related to
the H+ exchange capacity (acid content) but also to the acid
strength. For the solid catalysts with H0 4 À8.20 (TiPPh-non,
PMTP-1), the condensation reaction shown in Scheme S1
(ESIw) could hardly proceed; for the solid catalysts with
H0 o À8.20 (TiPPh-butylamine, TiP-butylamine, NKC-9),
the condensation reaction could proceed and the yields were
further determined by the acid contents and pore structure
(surface area, pore volume, etc.) of the materials. It is
This strategy is supposed to open a new area in the
development of outstanding phosphonate-based acid catalysts
and ion exchangers by the defect protection method. Only
small amounts of alkylamines were necessary instead of other
expensive additives, and the facile one-pot preparation process
also makes the present acid catalyst practical in some reactions
in the chemical industry. Moreover, because the P–OH groups
serve as carriers of protons, these materials may also find use
as an electrolyte for fuel cells.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (20973096 and 21073099), the National
Basic Research Program of China (2009CB623502), and the
Ministry-of-Education Program for Innovative Research
Team in University (IRT0927).
Notes and references
1 D. J. Jones, G. Aptel, M. Brandhorst, M. Jacquin, J. Jime
Jimenez, A. Jimenez-Lopez, P. Maireles-Torres, I. Piwonski,
E. Rodrıgues-Castellon, J. Zajac and J. Roziere, J. Mater. Chem.,
2000, 10, 1957.
´
nez-
´
´
´
´
´
2 T. Y. Ma and Z. Y. Yuan, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 2325.
3 T. Z. Ren, Z. Y. Yuan, A. Azioune, J. J. Pireaux and B. L. Su,
Langmuir, 2006, 22, 3886.
4 T. Y. Ma, X. Z. Lin and Z. Y. Yuan, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20,
7406.
5 A. Bhaumik and S. Inagaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 691.
6 T. Kimura, Chem. Mater., 2003, 15, 3742.
7 C. Sanchez, G. J. de A. A. Soler-Illia, F. Ribot, T. Lalot,
C. R. Mayer and V. Cabuil, Chem. Mater., 2001, 13, 3061.
8 T. Kimura, K. Kato and Y. Yamauchi, Chem. Commun., 2009,
4938.
9 P. H. Mutin, G. Guerrero and A. Vioux, J. Mater. Chem., 2005,
15, 3761.
10 P. Sairam, R. Puranik, B. S. Rao, P. V. Swamy and S. Chandra,
Carbohydr. Res., 2003, 338, 303.
11 M. Vasylyev, E. J. Wachtel, R. Popovitz-Biro and R. Neumann,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2006, 12, 3507.
12 G. Guerrero, P. H. Mutin and A. Vioux, Chem. Mater., 2000, 12,
1268.
13 R. Guillet-Nicolas, L. Marcoux and F. Kleitz, New J. Chem., 2010,
34, 355.
14 A. G. M. Barrett and S. A. Lebold, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 3853.
15 A. P. Wight and M. E. Davis, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 3589.
Table 1 Comparison of different acid catalysts
SBETa/ Vpore
/
Dporec/ H+ exchange
capacity/mmol gÀ1 (%)
Yield
b
Sample
m2 gÀ1 cm3 gÀ1 nm
TiPPh-butylamine 269 0.22
5.1
5.1
5.2
2.8
—
5.76
2.54
5.71
2.93
4.33
—
48.7
1.3
42.8
2.2
33.0
26.2
TiPPh-non
TiP-butylamine
PMTP-1d
242 0.21
281 0.23
1066 0.83
12 0.02
NKC-9e
Conc. HCl
—
—
—
a
BET surface area calculated from the linear part of the 10-point BET
b
plot. Single point total pore volume of pores at P/P0 = 0.97.
c
Estimated using the adsorption branch of the isotherm by the BJH
d
method. Periodic mesoporous titanium phosphonate materials
e
(see ref. 4). The commercial acidic resin.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6015–6017 6017