J.-R. Xu et al. / Phytochemistry Letters 15 (2016) 98–102
99
Fig. 1. Structure, key HMBC and 1H– H COSY correlations of compound 1.
1
side chain at C-6 of the hex-4-en-3-one moiety. Additionally, the
one methane (H-7), a tri-substituted double bond (H-9). 13C NMR
spectrum (Table 1) showed four quaternary carbons and a carbonyl
carbon (dC 208.6, C-10), The NMR spectrum also showed the signals
ascribable to the same diglycosyl moiety in 1. These spectroscopic
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
H– H COSY correlations of H-1 /H-2 /H-3 /H-4 /H-5 /H-6 and
their vicinal coupling constants, together with the HMBC
0
0
correlations between H-1 and C-11 and between H-11 and C-1 ,
indicated the connection of
b
-glucopyranosyloxy at C-11. The
data indicates that 2 is a tricyclic sesquiterpene
b
-
D
-apiofuranosyl-
1
1
00
00
00
0
b
H– H COSY correlation of H-1 /H-2 and the HMBC correlations
(1 !6 )-
-D-glucopyranoside, with an aglycone moiety different
from 1. In the H H COSY spectrum of 2 (Fig. 2), the correlations of
0
0
00
0
00
00
00
1 –1
between H-1 and C-4 /C-6 , between H-4 /H-5 and C-3 ,
0
00
between H-6 and C-1 , together with the quaternary nature of
C-3 , suggested a
00
0
b-apiofuranosyloxy at C-6 of the b-glucopyr-
Table 1
anosyl, which was supported by NMR data comparison of the
diglycosyl in 1 with structurally related compounds (Takayanagi
et al., 2003; Tamaki et al., 2000) and further confirmed by
enzymatic hydrolysis of 1 with snailase. In the hydrolysate of 1, a
sugar mixture of glucose and apiose was isolated by column
1
H NMR (500 MHz) and 13C NMR (150 MHz) spectral data of 1 and 2 (
d in ppm, J in
6
Hz, DMSO-d ).
Nos.
1
2
d
H
d
C
d
H
d
C
chromatography over silica gel (CH
identified by thin-layer liquid chromatography comparing with
authentic sugar controls. The sugar mixture, authentic -/ -glucose
and -/ -apiose separately reacted with -cycteine methyl ester and
arylisothiocyanate (Takana et al., 2007). The following HPLC
analysis indicated that two sugar derivatives from the mixture had
3
CN ꢀꢀ H
2
O, 7:2, v/v) and
1
2a
35.2
47.6
61.7
56.8
2.46 (1H, d, J = 16.5)
1.93 (1H, d, J = 16.5)
2b
3a
3b
4a
D
L
197.5 1.32 (1H, dd, J = 12.0, 6.0) 38.3
D
L
L
1.15 (1H, m)
5.85 (1H, s)
124.6 1.43 (1H, m)
1.33 (1H, m)
162.4 1.67 (1H, dd, J = 12.0, 6.0) 40.5
1.37 (1H, dd, J = 12.0, 6.0)
27.2
4b
5
5
6
7
8
9
a
b
the same retention time (t
derivatives, which indicated that both glycosyl units in 1 were the
-configuration. The similarity of the NMR data and the circular
dichroism spectra between 1 and the known acetylated
R
) to those of D-glucose and D-apiose
2.62 (1H, d, J = 9.5)
55.7
57.5
50.8
170.2
123.4
208.6
D
5.67 (1H, dd, J = 15.5, 9.5) 126.1 2.16 (1H, d, J = 5.0)
b
-D-
6.28 (1H, d, J = 15.5)
137.6
glucopyranoside (Lutz and Winterhalter,1992) indicated that 1 has
the same aglycone moiety including absolute configurations. The
configuration was further confirmed by comparison of the
experimental CD spectra of 1 with the calculated electronic CD
spectra, its aglycone, and a model compound with substitution of
the diglycosyl unit by a methyl group predicted from the quantum-
mechanical, time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT)
calculations (Li et al., 2010). Therefore, the structure of compound
135.3 6.01 (1H, d, J = 0.5)
127.9
1
0
5.66 (1H, dd, J = 7.0, 6.5)
1
1a
4.33 (1H, dd, J = 12.5, 6.5) 64.2
4.14 (1H, dd, J = 12.5, 7.0)
2.08 (1H, dd, J = 12.0, 5.0) 47.5
1
1b
1.85 (1H, d, J = 12.0)
0.95 (3H, s)
0.93 (3H, s)
1
2
1.71 (3H, s)
1.87 (3H, s)
0.92 (3H, s)
0.85 (3H, s)
12.2
23.5
27.8
26.3
17.6
23.7
28.8
72.4
13
1
4
1.11 (3H, s)
1
5a
4.46 (1H, dd, J = 17.5, 2.0)
4.36 (1H, dd, J = 17.5, 2.0)
4.22 (1H, d, J = 8.0)
3.23 (1H, t, J = 8.0)
3.12 (1H, t, J = 8.0)
3.20 (1H, m)
3.30 (1H, m)
3.95 (1H, dd, J = 11.5, 2.0)
3.51 (1H, dd, J = 11.5, 6.0)
15b
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
4.16 (1H, d, J = 8.0)
2.91 (1H, t, J = 8.0)
3.28 (1H, dd, J = 9.0, 8.0)
2.93 (1H, t, J = 9.0)
3.15 (1H, t, J = 9.0)
3.80 (1H, d, J = 11.5)
3.46 (1H, dd, J = 11.5, 7.0)
4.82 (1H, d, J = 3.0)
3.71 (1H, d, J = 2.0)
101.4
73.7
76.1
70.5
75.2
67.3
104.7
78.5
75.4
71.1
78.8
68.2
1
was elucidated as (R)-dehydroxyabscisic alcohol
b
-
D
-apiofur-
0
0
0
b
anosyl-(1 !6 )-
993).
Compound 2: ½
white amorphous powder. The molecular formula C26
deduced from HR-ESI-MS. The IR spectrum of 2 showed the
-D-glucopyranoside (Lutz and Winterhalter,
1
2
0
aꢁ
ꢀ 45.9 (c 0.04, MeOH), was obtained as a
11 was
D
6’a
6 b
0
H
40
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
4
4
5
109.7 4.97 (1H, d, J = 2.5)
111.9
78.7
80.2
75.6
ꢀ1
75.5
78.5
73.7
3.81 (1H, d, J = 2.5)
presence of hydroxyl (3389 cm
) and conjugated carbonyl
ꢀ
1
1
(
1738 and 1643 cm ) groups. The H NMR spectrum (Table 1)
00
00
a
b
3.88 (1H, d, J = 9.0)
3.52 (1H, d, J = 9.0)
3.36 (1H, m)
3.83 (1H, d, J = 9.5)
3.63 (1H, d, J = 9.5)
3.55 (1H, s)
displayed signals including three methyls (H-12, H-13, H-14), five
methylenes (an oxygen-connecting) (H-3, H-4, H-5, H-11, H-15),
00
63.6
65.2