Fig. 1 Molecular structure of 2 without H atoms: (a) showing the atom
labelling; (b) the crystal packing diagram showing the ‘cup-to-cup’
alignment of the metallocalixarene units. Selected bond lengths (Å) and
angles (°): Mo(1)–N(1) 1.735(5), Mo(1)–O(1) 1.936(5), Mo(1)–O(2)
1.941(4), Mo(1)–O(3) 1.936(5), Mo(1)–O(4) 1.949(5), Mo(1)–N(3)
2.304(6), Mo(2)–N(2) 1.716(5), Mo(2)–O(5) 1.948(5), Mo(2)–O(6)
1.942(4), Mo(2)–O(7) 1.920(4), Mo(2)–O(8) 1.953(5); Mo(1)–N(1)–C(1)
176.7(5), Mo(2)–N(2)–C(14) 178.8(5), C(4)–C(13)–C(17) 112.2(5) (a
Fig. 2 Molecular structure of 4 without hydrogen atoms: (a) showing the
atom labelling; (b) showing the intermolecular interactions between
adjacent metallocalixarene units. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°):
Mo(1)–N(1) 1.729(2), Mo(1)–O(1) 1.9419(18), Mo(1)–O(2) 1.9334(16),
Mo(1)–O(3) 1.9323(18), Mo(1)–O(4) 1.9713(16), Mo(1)–N(3) 2.326(2);
Mo(1)–N(1)–C(1) 171.60(19).
mm21 (Mo-Ka, l = 0.71073 Å), T = 160 K. 51852 Reflections were
measured on a Siemens SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer and
corrected for absorption. The structure was solved by direct methods and
refined by full-matrix least-squares on F2 values of all 16446 unique data
(Rint = 0.1135) with restraints on disordered substituents and solvent
uncoordinated NH2 group, together with a strong n(C–N)
stretch at 1287 cm21. The structure was confirmed by an X-ray
crystallographic study and is shown in Fig. 2(a). Each of the two
aromatic rings of the imido ligand interact weakly with two
aromatic carbons on an adjacent imido ligand [C(5)···C(12A)
3.449, C(6)···C(13A) 3.561 Å], and there is a hydrogen-bonding
interaction between one of the amine hydrogens and a
calixarene oxygen atom [O(4)···H(2AA) 2.188 Å] [Fig. 2(b)].
The complexes described here represent the first steps
towards the covalent linking of metallocalixarene units and the
development of tailored supramolecular metallocalixarene
arrays.
molecules; RA = {S[w(Fo 2 Fc2)2]/S[w(Fo2)2]}1/2 = 0.2589 for all data,
2
2
conventional R = 0.0779 on F values of 11304 reflections with Fo
>
2s(Fo2); goodness of fit = 1.086 on F2 for 1432 parameters and 423
restraints. Largest peak in final difference map 1.224 e Å23 ( > 3.2 Å from
all atoms, possibly further unresolved disordered solvent). Programs:
Siemens SMART (control), SAINT (integration), SHELXTL and local
programs.
Crystal data for 4: C60H69MoN3O4, M = 992.12, triclinic, space group
¯
P1, a = 12.5913(8), (b) = 14.5121(9), c = 14.5797(8) Å, a = 81.253(2),
b = 84.564(2), g = 84.657(2)°, U = 2612.9(3) Å3, Z = 2, Dc = 1.261
g cm23, m = 0.300 mm21 (Mo-Ka, l = 0.71073 Å), T = 160 K. 16442
The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council is
thanked for financial aupport.
Reflections were measured as for
2 yielding 11367 unique data
(Rint = 0.0193). The structure was solved by Patterson synthesis and refined
as for 2 with restraints on one disordered tert-butyl group; RA = 0.1004 for
Notes and References
2
all data, R = 0.0412 on F values of 9626 reflections with Fo > 2s(Fo2);
goodness of fit = 1.061 on F2 for 658 parameters and 139 restraints. Largest
† E-mail: v.gibson@ic.ac.uk
‡ Satisfactory elemental analyses have been obtained on 2 and 4. Selected
spectroscopic data for 2: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz, 298 K) d 7.12 (m,
peak in final difference map 0.686 e Å23. CCDC 182/971.
3
2
20H, aromatic H), 4.68 [spt, 4H, JHH 6.8, CH(CH3)2], 4.43 (d, 8H, JHH
12.2, CH2), 4.26 (s, 2H, ArCH2Ar), 3.23 (d, 8H, 2JHH 12.2, CH2), 1.53 [d,
1 Calixarenes by C. D. Gutsche, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge,
1989.
2 A. Zanotti-Gerosa, E. Solari, L. Giannini, C. Floriani, A. Chiesi-Villa and
C. Rizzoli, Chem. Commun., 1996, 119; J. A. Acho, T. Ren, J. W. Yuu
and S. J. Lippard, Inorg. Chem., 1995, 34, 5226.
3 B. Xu and T. M. Swager, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 1159.
4 V. C. Gibson, C. Redshaw, W. Clegg, M. R. J. Elsegood, U. Siemeling
and T. Turk, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1996, 4513.
5 V. C. Gibson, C. Redshaw, W. Clegg and M. R. J. Elsegood,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 2371.
3
24H, JHH 6.8 Hz, (CH3)2CH], 1.21 [m, 72H, (CH3)3C], 20.08 (s, 6H,
MeCN). For 4: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz, 298 K) d 8.05–6.50
(overlapping m, 16H, aromatic H), 4.42 (d, 4H, 2JHH 12.2, CH2calix), 3.95
2
2
(br s, 2H, NH2), 3.67 (t, 2H, JHH 7.4, ArCH2), 3.36 (t, 2H, JHH 7.4,
ArCH2), 3.32 (d, 4H, 2JHH 12.2 Hz, CH2calix), 2.03 (s, 3H, MeCN), 1.21 [s,
36H, (CH3)2CH], 20.08 (s, 3H, MeCN).
§ Crystal data for 2·2C5H12: C117H144Mo2N4O8·2C5H12, M = 2070.5,
monoclinic, space group I2/a (non-standard setting of C2/c avoiding large
b
angle),
a = 34.891(2), b = 16.2235(11), c = 45.318(3) Å,
b = 101.303(2)°, U = 25155(3) Å3, Z = 8, Dc = 1.093 g cm23, m = 0.251
Received in Basel, Switzerland, 5th March 1998; 8/01808A
1970
Chem. Commun., 1998