1148
OPTIMAL PREDICTORS OF PROSTATE CANCER ON REPEAT BIOPSY
gists and other physicians percent free PSA is the most
clinically useful tool for determining which patients initially
diagnosed with BPH should undergo repeat biopsy.
zone density and percent free PSA in addition to total PSA
levels. Prostate, 37: 133, 1998
23. Ukimura, O., Durrani, O. and Babaian, R. J.: Role of PSA and its
indices in determining the need for repeat prostate biopsies.
Urology, 50: 66, 1997
REFERENCES
24. Letran, J. L., Blase, A. B., Loberiza, F. R. et al: Repeat ultra-
sound guided prostate needle biopsy: use of free-to-total pros-
tate specific antigen ratio in predicting prostatic carcinoma.
J Urol, 160: 426, 1998
25. Morgan, T. O., McLeod, D. G., Leifer, E. S. et al: Prospective use
of free prostate-specific antigen to avoid repeat prostate biop-
sies in men with elevated total prostate-specific antigen. Urol-
ogy, 48: 76, 1996
26. Fleshner, N. E., O’Sullivan, M. and Fair, W. R.: Prevalence and
predictors of a positive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided
needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol, 158: 505, 1997
27. Catalona, W. J., Beiser, J. A. and Smith, D. S.: Serum free
prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density
measurements for predicting cancer in men with prior nega-
tive prostatic biopsies. J Urol, 158: 2162, 1997
28. Keetch, D. W., McMurtry, J. M., Smith, D. S. et al: Prostate
specific antigen density versus prostate specific antigen slope
as predictors of prostate cancer in men with initially negative
prostatic biopsies. J Urol, 156: 428, 1996
29. Rietbergen, J. B. W., Boeken Kruger, A. E., Hoedemaeker, R. F.
et al: Repeat screening for prostate cancer after 1-year fol-
lowup in 984 biopsied men: clinical and pathological features
of detected cancer. J Urol, 160: 2121, 1998
30. Durkan, G. C. and Greene, D. R.: Elevated serum prostate spe-
cific antigen levels in conjunction with an initial prostatic
biopsy negative for carcinoma: who should undergo a repeat
biopsy? BJU Int, 83: 34, 1999
31. Noguchi, M., Yahara, J., Koga, H. et al: Necessity of repeat
biopsies in men for suspected prostate cancer. Int J Urol, 6: 7,
1999
32. Keetch, D. W. and Catalona, W. J.: Prostatic transition zone
biopsies in men with previous negative biopsies and persis-
tently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. J Urol,
154: 1795, 1995
1. Cancer Facts and Figures, 1998. Atlanta: American Cancer So-
ciety, 1998
2. Partin, A. W. and Oesterling, J. E.: The clinical usefulness of
prostate specific antigen: update 1994. J Urol, 152: 1358, 1994
3. Brawer, M. K.: Prostate-specific antigen: critical issues. Urology,
44: 9, 1994
4. Hudson, M. A., Bahnson, R. R. and Catalona, W. J.: Clinical use
of prostate specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer.
J Urol, 142: 1011, 1989
5. Stamey, T. A., Yang, N., Hay, A. R. et al: Prostate-specific anti-
gen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
N Engl J Med, 317: 909, 1987
6. Beduschi, M. C. and Oesterling, J. E.: Percent free prostate-
specific antigen: the next frontier in prostate-specific antigen
testing. Urology, suppl., 51: 98, 1998
7. Catalona, W. J., Smith, D. S., Wolfert, R. L. et al: Evaluation of
percentage of free serum prostate-specific antigen to improve
specificity of prostate cancer screening. JAMA, 274: 1214,
1995
8. Morote, J., Ravento´s, C. X., Lorente, J. A. et al: Comparison of
percent free prostate specific antigen and prostate specific
antigen density as methods to enhance prostate specific anti-
gen specificity in early prostate cancer detection in men with
normal rectal examination and prostate specific antigen be-
tween 4.1 and 10 ng/mL. J Urol, 158: 502, 1997
9. Vashi, A. R., Wojno, K. J., Henricks, W. et al: Determination of
the “reflex range” and appropriate cutpoints for percent free
prostate-specific antigen in 413 men referred for prostatic
evaluation using the AxSYM system. Urology, 49: 19, 1997
10. Bangma, C. H., Rietbergen, J. B. W., Kranse, R. et al: The
free-to-total prostate specific antigen ratio improves the spec-
ificity of prostate specific antigen in screening for prostate
cancer in the general population. J Urol, 157: 2191, 1997
11. Bedushi, M. C. and Oesterling, J. E.: Prostate-specific antigen
density. Urol Clin North Am, 24: 323, 1997
33. Keetch, D. W., Catalona, W. J. and Smith, D. S.: Serial prostatic
biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate
specific antigen values. J Urol, 151: 1571, 1994
12. Bazinet, M., Meshref, A. W., Trudel, C. et al: Prospective evalu-
ation of prostate specific antigen density and systematic biop-
sies for early detection of prostatic carcinoma. Urology, 43: 44,
1994
EDITORIAL COMMENT
13. Carter, H. B. and Pearson, J. D.: Prostate-specific antigen veloc-
ity and repeated measures of prostate-specific antigen. Urol
Clin North Am, 24: 333, 1997
14. Richardson, T. D. and Oesterling, J. E.: Age-specific reference
ranges for serum prostate-specific antigen. Urol Clin North
Am, 24: 339, 1997
15. Djavan, B., Zlotta, A. R., Byttebier, G. et al: Prostate specific
antigen density of the transition zone for early detection of
prostate cancer. J Urol, 160: 411, 1998
16. Djavan, B., Zlotta, A., Kratzik, C. et al: PSA, PSA density, PSA
density of transition zone, free/total PSA ratio and PSA veloc-
ity for early detection of prostate cancer in men with serum
PSA 2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL. Urology, 54: 517, 1999
17. Djavan, B., Zlotta, A. R., Remzi, M. et al: Total and transition
zone prostate volume and age: how do they affect the utility of
PSA-based diagnostic parameters for early prostate cancer
detection? Urology, 54: 846, 1999
18. Djavan, B., Seitz, C., Remzi, M. et al: Combination and multi-
variate analysis of PSA-based parameters for prostate cancer
prediction. Tech Urol, 5: 71, 1999
19. Zlotta, A. R., Djavan, B., Roumegue`re, T. et al: Transition zone volume
on transrectal ultrasonography is more accurate and reproducible
than the total prostate volume. BJU Int, 84: 661, 1999
20. Catalona, W. J., Partin, A. W., Slawin, K. M. et al: Use of the
percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differ-
entiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a
prospective multicenter clinical trial. JAMA, 279: 1542, 1998
21. Chan, D. W., Sokoll, L. J., Partin, A. W. et al: The use of percent
free PSA to predict prostate cancer probabilities: an eleven
center prospective study using an automated immunoassay
system in a population with non-suspicious DRE. J Urol,
suppl., 161: 95, abstract 353, 1999
The authors indicate which PSA related factors might indicate
which men at risk of prostate cancer should undergo repeat sextant
biopsies after initial negative results. Their experience with 820
repeat biopsies in men 44 to 77 years old at risk for prostate cancer
with PSA 4 to 10 ng./ml. is the largest study on prospectively per-
forming repeat biopsy in men published so far to my knowledge, and
justifies the use of the PSA ratio or percent free PSA as an indicator.
At a sensitivity of 95% the specificity or true negative value of the
use of percent free PSA was 33.5%, which was significantly more
than that of PSA density (14.7%) or transition zone PSA density
(21.4%) at the given cutoffs. Although 14% of men with percent free
PSA less than 38% had a positive repeat biopsy, no cancer could be
detected in 98% of those with percent free PSA greater than this
cutoff. Therefore, the number of men in whom re-biopsy could be
avoided relatively safely, although PSA was “suspect” was larger
with percent free PSA compared to volume adjusted PSA. As the
number of men included in this study is considerable, the confidence
intervals around these percentages are probably low. I could not
determine easily how these findings related to the results of digital
rectal examination. In this PSA range digital rectal examination
certainly has value for first visit screening,1 although its low inter-
observer agreement is well accepted. Digital rectal examination was
not demonstrated to be a predictor of cancer but did it reinforce the
predicted negative results of percent free PSA?
Remarkably, prostate volume in men with cancer on repeat biopsy
appeared to be larger than that of men with cancer detected initially
(442 participants, p ϭ 0.19). The findings of Reitbergen et al were
similar but significant (p ϭ 0.003) during repeat screening after 1
year, as about 10% of men had positive biopsies (reference 29 in
article). Therefore, the suggestion of Brawer (reference 3 in article)
and others to take more biopsies in men with larger glands, seems to
22. Horninger, W., Reissigl, A., Klocker, H. et al: Improvement of be valid and is undoubtedly applied by many urologists. However,
specificity in PSA-based screening by using PSA-transition the findings of missing up to 25% in clinical series of detectable