In conclusion, the photophysical properties of a series of
brominated porphycenes were clarified such that their photo-
physical parameters are dependent on the number of bro-
mines. Especially, the dibrominated porphycene shows the
highest sensitization efficiency for singlet oxygen production
in response to visible light.
We thank Prof. K. Sakai and Dr S. Masaoka, Kyushu
University, for helping to measure the transient absorption
spectra. This work was partially supported by Global COE
Program ‘‘Science for Future Molecular Systems’’ from the
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
(MEXT) of Japan and Research for Promoting Technology Seeds
(15-007) from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST).
Fig. 4 (a) Phosphorescence spectra of singlet oxygen sensitized by a
series of porphycenes in air-saturated toluene at r.t. with excitation at
600 nm. (b) Comparison of FD values for a series of porphycenes.
Table 2 Photophysical parameters of a series of porphycenesab
Notes and references
Compound Ffc
Fic
FT
FD
10ꢁ7
10ꢁ7
10ꢁ7
z Crystallographic data are given in the ESI.w Compounds 3 and 4
kf/sꢁ1 kic/sꢁ1 kisc/sꢁ1
have crystallographically imposed inversion symmetry.
1
2
3
4
5
0.37
0.08
0.03
0.27 0.36 0.36 4.1
0.02 0.90 0.90 5.7
0.02 0.95 0.95 4.0
3.0
1.4
2.7
260
870
4.0
64
130
700
1. J. L. Sessler, A. Gebauer and E. Vogel, in The Porphyrin Handbook,
ed. K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith and R Guilard, Academic Press,
New York, 2000, ch. 8, vol. 2, pp. 1–54.
0.006 0.27 0.72 0.71 5.8
0.002 0.46 0.53 0.49 3.8
2. E. Vogel, M. Kocher, H. Schmickler and J. Lex, Angew. Chem.,
¨
Int. Ed. Engl., 1986, 25, 257–259.
1000
a
3. (a) J. Waluk, M. Muller, P. Swiderek, M. Kocher, E. Vogel,
¨
¨
Ff: Fluorescence quantum yield; Fic: internal conversion quantum
G. Hohlneicher and J. Michl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113,
5511–5527; (b) T. Hayashi, H. Dejima, T. Matsuo, H. Sato,
D. Murata and Y. Hisaeda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124,
11226–11227; (c) J. Hasegawa, K. Takata, T. Miyahara,
S. Neya, M. J. Frisch and H. Nakatsuji, J. Phys. Chem. A,
yield; FT: triplet quantum yield; FD: singlet oxygen production
quantum yield. Solvent, toluene. Determined by absolute and re-
lative methods for 1–3 and 4–5, respectively. Degassed under nitrogen.
b
c
Finally, catalysis of the porphycene for photo-oxygenation
of 1,5-dihydroxynaphthalene was investigated ([sensitizer] =
1.28 mM, [substrate] = 3.33 mM, solv. CH2Cl2–MeOH (9 : 1
v/v) in air at r.t. with a 500 W tungsten lamp (l Z 460 nm)).
As expected, the photoreaction effectively proceeded and the
oxygenated product, 5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone, was
quantitatively obtained within 1 h in the case of 3. In contrast,
tetraphenylporphyrin (H2TPP) and tetrakis(2,6-dichlorophe-
nylporphyrin (H2TPPCl8) yield only 12 and 29% of the
product, respectively, regardless of their high FD values (0.88
for H2TPP, 0.98 for H2TPPCl8).7,8 The advantage of the
porphycene over porphyrin in the photoreaction is due to its
more effective light absorption in the visible region. Further-
more, the porphycene did not show bleaching during irradia-
tion by visible light (ESIw).
2005, 109, 3187–3200; (d) D. Sa
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 215–232.
4. (a) S. E. Braslavsky, M. Muller, D. O. Ma
´
nchez-Ganchez and J. L. Sessler,
´
rtire, S. Porting,
¨
¨
S. G. Bertolotti, S. Chakravorti, G. Koc-Weier, B. Knipp and
K. Schaffer, J. Photochem. Photobiol., B, 1997, 40, 191–198;
(b) J. C. Sockert, M. Canete, A. Juarranz, A. Villanueva,
R. W. Horobin, J. K. Borrell, J. Teixido and S. Nonell, Curr.
Med. Chem., 2007, 14, 997–1026; (c) T. Baba, H. Shimakoshi,
A. Endo, C. Adachi and Y. Hisaeda, Chem. Lett., 2008, 3, 264–265.
5. (a) R. Bonnett, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1995, 19–33; (b) R. K. Pandey and
G. Zheng, in The Porphyrin Handbook, ed. K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith
and R Guilard, Academic Press, New York, 2000, ch. 43, vol. 6,
pp. 157–230; (c) A. Greer, Acc. Chem. Res., 2006, 39, 797–804.
6. P. F. Aramendia, R. W. Redmond, N. Santiago, W. Schuster,
S. E. Braslavsky, K. Schaffner and E. Vogel, Photochem. Photo-
biol., 1986, 44, 555–559.
7. (a) R. W. Redmond and J. N. Gamlin, Photochem. Photobiol., 1999, 70,
391–475; (b) T. Nyokong, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2007, 251, 1707–1722.
8. E. G. Azenha, A. C. Serra, M. Pineiro, M. M. Pereira, J. S. Melo,
L. G. Arnaut, S. J. Formosinho and A. M. d’A. R. Gonsalves,
Chem. Phys., 2002, 280, 177–190.
9. (a) S. Will, A. Rahbar, H. Schmickler, J. Lex and E. Vogel, E.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1990, 29, 1390–1393; (b) I. Aritome,
H. Shimakoshi and Y. Hisaeda, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C, 2002,
58, o563–o564; (c) T. Baba, H. Shimakoshi, I. Aritome and
Y. Hisaeda, Chem. Lett., 2004, 33, 906–907. In these papers, the
authors described the syntheses of the mono- (2), tri- (4) and tetra-
(5) brominated porphycenes.
10. Tetra-brominated porphycene 5 affords three kinds of crystal
structures. Form III is described in this paper for the first time.
11. The photophysical data for 1 have also been reported: N. Rubio, F. Prat,
N. Bou, J. I. Borrell, J. Teixido, A. Villanueva, A. Juarranz, M. Canete,
J. C. Stockert and S. Nonell, New J. Chem., 2005, 29, 378–384.
12. D. Garcı
and E. Oliveros, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1996, 79, 1222–1238.
13. S. Nonell, P. F. Aramendıa, K. Heihoff, R. M. Negri and
´
a-Fresnadillo, Y. Georgiadou, G. Orellana, A. M. Braun
´
S. E. Braslavsky, J. Phys. Chem., 1990, 94, 5879–5883.
14. The distortion of 4 is reduced in the crystal as shown in Fig. 2 by
p–p stacking between the aromatic rings: see crystallographic data
in CCDC 677020.
15. I. V. Sazannovich, V. A. Galievsky, A. v. Hoek, T. J. Schaafsma,
V. L. Malinovskii, D. Holten and V. S. Chirvony, J. Phys. Chem.
B, 2001, 105, 7818–7829.
Fig. 5 Schematic representations of effects of bromine groups. The
rate constants (kf, kicand kisc/107 sꢁ1) are from Table 2.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
2884 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 2882–2884