1
134
L. Garanti, G. Molteni / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 1133–1135
1
bonyl-1,2,3-triazole 10, respectively, with 83% overall
yield. In conclusion, the present study provides the first
insight into the cycloaddition between the MeOPEG-
supported azide 2 and a number of alkynyl dipolar-
ophiles. Further developments are in progress.
Acknowledgements
We thank the NMR specialist Dr. Lara De Benassuti,
1
University of Milan, for H NMR analyses of the
MeOPEG-supported materials.
Scheme 2.
Table 1. Cycloaddition between MeOPEG-supported azide
References
2
and alkynyl dipolarophiles 4
1
. Huisgen, R.; Knorr, R.; M o¨ bius, L.; Szeimnies, G.
Chem. Ber. 1965, 98, 4014.
. Lwowsky, W. In 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry;
Padwa, A., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1984;
Vol. 1, Chapter 4, pp. 621–627.
R
Product yield (%)
Product ratioa
5
+6
2
5:6
7:8
Ph
COOMe
CH Cl
CH Br
CH OH
CH CH OH
98
98
96
96
95
93
80:20
83:17
70:30
70:30
57:43
76:24
50:50
82:18
66:34
–
–
–
3
. (a) Alvarez, R.; Velazquez, S.; San, F.; Aquaro, S.; De,
C.; Perno, C.; Karlsson, A.; Balzarini, J.; Camarasa, M.
J. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 4185; (b) Velazquez, S.;
Alvarez, R.; Perez, C.; Gago, F.; De, C.; Balzarini, J.;
Camarasa, M. J. Antivir. Chem. Chemoter. 1998, 9, 481.
2
2
2
2
2
a
Determined from 1H NMR.
4. Genin, M. J.; Allwine, D. A.; Anderson, D. J.; Bar-
bachyn, M. R.; Emmert, D. E.; Garmon, S. A.; Graber,
D. R.; Grega, K. C.; Hester, J. B.; Hutchinson, D. K.;
Morris, J.; Reischer, R. J.; Ford, C. W.; Zurenko, G.
E.; Hamel, J. C.; Schaadt, R. D.; Stapert, D.; Yagi, B.
H. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 953.
5
6
7
product yield, while the ratio 5:6 was generally similar
16
to that of 7:8 as it was reported previously for the
reaction between n-pentylazide and the appropriate
alkynyl dipolarophile (Fig. 1 and Table 1).
. Brockunier, L. L.; Parmee, E. R.; Ok, H. O.; Candelore,
M. R.; Cascieri, M. A.; Colwell, L. F.; Deng, L.;
Feeney, W. P.; Forrest, M. J.; Hom, G. J.; MacIntyre,
D. E.; Tota, L.; Wywratt, M. J.; Fisher, M. H.; Weber,
A. E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 2111.
. (a) Fr u¨ chtel, J. S.; Jung, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1996, 35, 17; (b) Allin, S. M.; Sharma, P. K.
Synthesis 1997, 1217; (c) Ellmann, J. A. Chem. Rev.
Finally, the removal of the MeOPEG pendant from the
mixture of supported cycloadducts 5b+6b was accom-
plished in mild conditions (see Scheme 3) giving 4-
1
7
methoxycarbonyl-1,2,3-triazole 9 or 5-methoxycar-
1996, 96, 555; (d) Krc nˇ a´ k, V.; Holladay, M. W. Chem.
Rev. 2002, 102, 61.
. Nefzi, A.; Otresh, J. M.; Houghten, R. A. Chem. Rev.
1997, 97, 449.
8
9
. Toy, P. H.; Janda, K. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 546.
. L o` pez-Pelegr `ı n, J. A.; Wentworth, P., Jr.; Sieber, F.;
Metz, W. A.; Janda, K. D. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
8527.
10. Zhao, X.-y.; Metz, W. A.; Sieber, F.; Janda, K. D.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8433.
Figure 1.
11. The yields of MeOPEG-bounded materials were deter-
mined by weight of pure compounds. The purity of
1
MeOPEG-bounded compounds was determined by
H
NMR analyses with pre-saturation of the MeOPEG
methylene signals at 3.64 l.
1
1
2. H NMR data of 3 (CDCl ): l 3.28 (2H, t, J=7.0,
3
CH OCH6 –), 3.33 (3H, s, CH6 3OCH –), 3.80 (2H, t, J=
3
2
2
7
.0, –C H6 CH Nꢀ), 3.94 (6H, s, C H6 3COO–), 4.81 (2H,
2
2
t, J=7.0, –CH CH
6
2Nꢀ).
2
Scheme 3.
13. Zalkow, L. H.; Hill, R. H. Tetrahedron 1975, 31, 831.