Journal of Natural Products
Article
2a: white powder; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δH 2.58−3.10 (2H,
m, H-4″), 3.33 (3H, s, MeO-5), 3.40 (3H, s, MeO-5′), 3.70 (3H, s,
MeO-5″), 3.73 (3H, s, MeO-7), 3.78 (3H, s, MeO-14″), 3.81 (3H, s,
MeO-14′), 3.83 (3H, s, MeO-14), 4.04 (1H, m, H-3″), 4.12 (1H, d, J
= 3.5 Hz, H-3′), 4.25 (1H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, H-3), 4.30 (1H, d, J = 3.5 Hz,
H-4 or H-4′), 4.32 (1H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, H-4 or H-4′), 4.70 (1H, d, J =
8.0 Hz, H-2″), 5.98 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz, H-6″), 6.08 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz,
H-6), 6.18 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz, H-6′), 6.20 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz, H-8),
6.92−7.70 (12H, aromatic protons in rings B, E, and H); ESIMS m/z
911.2 [M − H]−.
Statistical Analysis. Hyaloid vessel diameter was used to calculate
the percentage inhibition of compound 3 in HG-treated embryos
according to the formula
percentage inhibition (%)
= [1 − (T − Cav)/(HGav − Cav)] × 100
n
where Cav = average of hyaloid-vessel diameter (SI) in the control
embryos, HGav = average of hyaloid-vessel diameter (SI) in the HG-
treated embryos, and Tn = hyaloid-vessel diameter (SI) of the HG-
treated embryos with compound 3. The results are expressed as means
standard error of the mean (SEM) from three independent
experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett’s multiple comparison
tests with the GraphPad 5.0 Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego,
CA, USA).
1
3a: white powder; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δH 2.60−3.11
(2H, m, H-4″), 3.31 (3H, s, MeO-5), 3.38 (3H, s, MeO-5′), 3.68 (3H,
s, MeO-13′), 3.74 (3H, s, MeO-14′), 3.78 (3H, s, MeO-5″), 3.83 (3H,
s, MeO-7), 3.87 (3H, s, MeO-14″), 3.90 (3H, s, MeO-14), 4.03 (1H,
m, H-3″), 4.14 (1H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, H-3′), 4.26 (1H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, H-3),
4.30 (1H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, H-4′), 4.34 (1H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, H-4), 4.70 (1H,
d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-2″), 5.96 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz, H-6″), 6.07 (1H, d, J =
2.2 Hz, H-6), 6.19 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz, H-6′), 6.20 (1H, d, J = 2.2 Hz,
H-8), 6.90−7.72 (11H, aromatic protons in rings B, E, and H); ESIMS
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
m/z 941.3 [M − H]−
.
1H NMR, 13C NMR, NOESY, and mass spectra for the new
compounds 1−3 and zebrafish data of compound 6. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
Acid Hydrolysis of 1. Compound 1 (5 mg) in 10% HCl−dioxane
(1:1, 1 mL) was heated at 80 °C for 3 h in a water bath. The mixture
was neutralized with Ag2CO3, filtered, and extracted with EtOAc (20
mL). The EtOAc layer was evaporated, and the residue subjected to
reversed-phase HPLC [Agilent 1200 system; YMC-pack Pro C18
column (250 × 10 mm, i.d.); MeOH−H2O (30:70, v/v); UV
detection, 270 nm; flow rate, 3.0 mL/min] to give ent-epiafzelechin-
(2α→O→7,4α→8)-ent-afzelechin (4, 2 mg), identified by comparing
spectroscopic data with literature data.7 The aqueous layer was
evaporated, and the residue was treated with L-cysteine methyl ester
hydrochloride (2 mg) in pyridine (0.5 mL) at 60 °C for 1 h. After the
reaction was completed, the solution was treated with Ac2O (3 mL) at
60 °C for 1 h. Authentic samples were prepared by the same
procedure. The acetate derivatives were subjected to gas chromatog-
raphy (GC) analysis. GC conditions: GC-2010 (Shimadzu) instru-
ment; detector, FID; column, TC-1 capillary column (0.25 mm × 30
m; GL Science, Inc.); column temperature, 230 °C; programmed
increase, 38 °C/min; carrier gas, N2 (1 mL/min); injection and
detector temperature, 270 °C. The sugar derivative thus obtained
showed a retention time of 21.30 min, identical to that of authentic D-
glucose.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*Tel: +82-42-868-9465. Fax: +82-42-868-9471. E-mail: jskim@
■
Author Contributions
∥I.-S. Lee and S. Y. Yu contributed equally to this work.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This research was supported by a grant (K12040, K13040)
from the Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. The NMR and
MS experiments were performed by the Korea Basic Science
Institute (KBSI). The authors thank Prof. C.-H. Kim
(Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of
Korea) for providing zebrafish lines and for technical support.
Determination of AGE Formation. According to a well-
established method, the reaction mixture [bovine serum albumin (10
mg/mL, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA; 700 μL) in 50 mM phosphate
buffer (pH 7.4) with 0.02% sodium azide] was added to 0.2 M fructose
and glucose (100 μL). In screw cap tubes (1.5 mL), the reaction
mixture was mixed with 200 μL of serially diluted compounds and
aminoguanidine (Sigma). After incubating at 37 °C for 7 days, the
fluorescent reaction products (200 μL) were transferred to 96-well
plates and assayed on a spectrofluorometric detector (Bio-Tek,
Synergy HT, USA; excitation wavelength, 350 nm; emission
wavelength, 450 nm). The AGE assay was performed in triplicate.
The concentration of each test sample giving 50% inhibition of the
activity (IC50) was estimated from the least-squares regression line of
the logarithmic concentration plotted against remaining activity.
Measurement of Vessel Dilation in Larval Zebrafish. Adult
zebrafish were maintained under standard conditions at 28.5 °C under
a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle. Embryos were obtained from crosses
between flk:EGFP Tg (transgenic) fish and raised in egg water (sea
salt, 0.06 g/L). One-day flk:EGFP Tg embryos were placed into 24-
well plates (five embryos per well) and maintained in 2 mL volumes of
egg water with 30 mM glucose. HG-induced embryos were treated
with 10 or 20 μM of compounds from 1 day postfertilization (dpf) to
6 dpf. At 6 dpf, HG-induced embryos were fixed with 4% (v/v)
paraformaldehyde, and each lens containing hyaloid retinal vessels was
isolated and aligned so that the optic disc (OD) was facing upward.
Fluorescence images were obtained using an Olympus SZX16
stereomicroscope. The diameters of hyaloid vessels were measured
in 3−4 main branches of the OD, to the first sub-branch, using the
Image J software. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Wei, M.; Gaskill, S. P.; Hanffner, S. M.; Stern, M. P. Diabetes Care
1998, 21, 1167−1172.
(2) Laakso, M. Diabetes 1999, 48, 937−942.
(3) Nishikawa, T.; Edelstein, D.; Du, X. L.; Yamagishi, S.;
Matsumura, T.; Kaneda, Y.; Yorek, M. A.; Beebe, D.; Oates, P. J.;
Hammes, H. P.; Giardino, I.; Brownlee, M. Nature 2000, 404, 787−
790.
(4) Brownlee, M. Nature 2001, 414, 813−820.
(5) Takenaka, K.; Yamagishi, S.; Matsui, T.; Nakamura, K.; Imaizumi,
T. Curr. Neurovasc. Res. 2006, 3, 73−77.
(6) Li, C.; Ikeda, H.; Ohba, H. In Wu, Z. Y.; Raven, P. H.; Hong, D.
Y., Eds. Flora of China, Vol. 9; Science Press: Beijing, and Missouri
Botanical Garden Press: St. Louis, 2003; p 384.
(7) Bilia, A. R.; Morelli, I.; Hamburger, M.; Hostettmann, K.
Phytochemistry 1996, 43, 887−892.
(8) Rawat, M. S. M.; Prasad, D.; Joshi, R. K.; Pant, G. Phytochemistry
1999, 50, 321−324.
(9) Prasad, D. Fitoterapia 2000, 71, 245−253.
(10) Mabry, T. J.; Markham, K. R.; Thomas, M. B. The Systematic
Identification of Flavonoids; Springer: New York, 1970; p 41.
(11) Jacques, D.; Haslam, E.; Bedford, G. R.; Greatbanks, D. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1974, 2663−2671.
(12) Lou, H.; Yamazaki, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Uchida, M.; Tanaka, H.; Oka,
S. Phytochemistry 1999, 51, 297−308.
G
dx.doi.org/10.1021/np400442b | J. Nat. Prod. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX