122
H.-M. Yang et al. / Phytochemistry 151 (2018) 119e127
tetrahydroxyurs-12-en-28-ursolic acid.
HRESIMS (m/z 520.3629 [M
þ
NH4]þ, calcd for C30H50NO6,
Compound 2 was isolated as white and amorphous powder. The
molecular formula C30H48O7 was deduced from HRESIMS (m/z
538.3738 [M þ NH4]þ, calcd for C30H52NO7, 538.3738) and 13C NMR
data. The 1H NMR spectrum of 2 exhibited the typical spectroscopic
features of an ursane-type triterpene, including an olefinic proton
at dH 5.66 (1H, br s), three oxygenated methine protons at dH 4.97
(1H, m), 4.45 (1H, m) and 4.15 (1H, d, J ¼ 4.5 Hz), a pairs of
oxygenated methylene protons at dH 4.16 (1H, d, J ¼ 10.0 Hz) and
3.92 (1H, d, J ¼ 10.0 Hz), five methyl singlets at dH 1.44, 1.50, 1.68,
1.68,1.72 and a methyl doublet at dH 1.11 (3H, d, J ¼ 5.0 Hz) (Table 1).
In addition, the 13C NMR spectrum displayed one carboxylic carbon
at dC 181.1, five oxygenated carbons at dC 66.7, 68.4, 72.2, 73.1, 81.1 as
well as two olefinic carbons at dC 128.6 and 139.7 (Table 1). These
520.3633) and 13C NMR data. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra (Table 2)
were almost identical to those of 1 except for the replacement of a
methyl signal [dH 0.99 (3H, d, J ¼ 6.0 Hz)] by the NMR signals due to
an exomethylene [dH 4.76 (1H, br s), 4.81 (1H, br s); dC 154.3, 105.4]
in 4. The location of terminal double bond was deduced at C-20 and
C-30 from the HMBC correlations of dH 4.76 and 4.81 with C-19 (dC
38.1)/C-21 (dC 33.2), H-29 (dH 1.11) with C-19 (dC 38.1)/C-18 (dC
56.1)/C-20 (dC 154.3) (Fig. 5). The relative configuration of 4 was
consistent with that of 1 and confirmed by the NOE interactions in
the NOESY spectrum (Fig. 5). Hence, the structure of 4 (Fig. 1) was
elucidated as 1
ursolic acid.
b, 2a, 3b, 23-tetrahydroxyurs-12,20(30)-dien-28-
Compound 5 was obtained as white and amorphous powder. It
gave the molecular formula C36H56O10, according to its HRESIMS at
m/z 666.4210 [M þ NH4]þ (calcd for 666.4212) and 13C NMR data.
The 13C NMR spectrum of 5 showed 36 carbon signals due to the
aglycone and one sugar moiety (Table 2). The five sp3 carbons (dC
16.8, 17.6, 18.1, 18.1, 24.0), two sp2 carbons (dC 126.8, 138.6) and a
carboxylic carbon (dC 176.0) were coupled with the 1H NMR data
which were assigned as four methyl proton singlets (dH 1.17, 1.09,
1.05, 0.87), a methyl proton doublet (dH 1.04), a broad triplet-like
NMR data (Table 1) were almost identical to those of 2a, 3a,19a, 23-
tetrahydroxy-12-en-28-ursolic acid (Lee et al., 2005) except for the
replacement of one methylene by an additional oxymethine [dH
4.97 (1H, m); dC 68.4] in 2. The 1He1H COSY correlations of the
oxymethine proton between H-5 and H-7 (Fig. 3) revealed the
attachment of an OH group to C-6 in 2. The NOE interaction of H-5
with H-6 (Fig. 3) confirmed the
compound (Fig. 1) was elucidated as 2a,3a,6
pentahydroxyurs-12-en-28-ursolic acid.
b-orientation of 6-OH. Therefore,
2
b
,19 ,23-
a
vinyl proton signal
(dH 5.44). These data indicated that 5
Compound 3 appears as white and amorphous powder. Its
molecular formula was established as C30H48O6 by HRESIMS (m/z
522.3786 [M þ NH4]þ, calcd for C30H52NO6, 522.3789) and 13C NMR
data. The 1H NMR spectrum (Table 1) displayed resonances for five
methyl singlets (dH 1.06, 1.07, 1.07, 1.14, 1.38), a methyl doublet [dH
1.22 (3H, d, J ¼ 5.0 Hz)], two oxymethines [dH 4.24 (1H, ddd,
J ¼ 10.5,9.5,4.0 Hz), 4.19 (1H, d, J ¼ 9.5 Hz)], an oxygenated methy-
lene group [dH 4.18 (1H, d, J ¼ 10.0 Hz), 3.72 (1H, d, J ¼ 10.0 Hz)] and
an olefinic proton [dH 5.54 (1H, br s)]. The 13C NMR spectrum
(Table 1) showed 30 carbon resonances comprising four oxygen-
bearing carbons (dC 67.1, 69.3, 72.7, 78.8), two olefinic carbons (dC
139.1 and 125.8) and a carboxylic carbon (dC 180.2). These spec-
trometric data (Table 1) were comparable to those of 2a, 3a, 23-
trihydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid (Lee et al., 2008) except for
replacement of one methine by an additional oxygenated quater-
nary carbon (dC 72.7) in 3. Furthermore, the OH group was located
at C-20 based on the HMBC cross-peak from H-29 [dH 1.22 (3H, d,
J ¼ 5.0 Hz)] and H-30 [dH 1.38 (3H, s)] to C-20 (dC 72.7) (Fig. 4). The
possessed an urs-12-en-28-oic acid skeleton. Furthermore, the 1H
and 13C NMR spectrum (Table 2) exhibited an exomethylene signal
[
dH 4.71, 4.73 (each 1H, br s); dC 153.6, 105.6]. The comparison of
NMR data (Table 2) with those of 2 ,3 ,23-trihydroxy-12,20(30)-
dien-28-ursolic acid (Sashida et al., 1992) indicated the presence of
-glucopyranosyl moiety on the basis of the 13C NMR data as well
as the coupling constant of the anomeric proton (JH-1' ¼ 8.5 Hz)
(Yang et al., 2012). Acid hydrolysis of 5 afforded a -glucose from
a
a
a
b
D
HPLC analysis compared with an authentic sugar sample. The
linkage of the glucose was verified at C-28 by the HMBC correlation
from H-1' (dH 6.25) to dC 176.0 (Fig. 6). The relative configuration of
the aglycone was determined to be 2a, 3a, 23-trihydroxy-12,
20(30)-dien-28-ursolic acid by NOESY spectrum interpretation
(Fig. 6). Consequently, compound 5 was assigned as 2a, 3a, 23-
trihydroxy-12, 20(30)-dien-28-ursolic acid 28-O-b-D-glucopyrano-
side (Fig. 1).
Compound 6 was isolated as a white and amorphous powder. Its
molecular formula of C35H54O9 was determined from HRESIMS (m/z
641.3653 [MþNa]þ, calcd for C35H54NaO9, 641.3660) and 13C NMR
data. In the 1H NMR spectrum (Table 2), six methyl singlets (dH 1.40,
1.21, 1.19, 1.19, 0.93, 0.89), one olefinic proton signal at dH 5.50 (1H,
br s), together with one anomeric proton signal at dH 6.24 (1H, d,
J ¼ 7.0 Hz) were observed. The 13C NMR spectrum (Table 2) showed
signals at dC 213.5, 177.0 (for a keto carbonyl group and an ester
carbonyl group), two olefinic carbons signals (dC 143.8, 123.7), and
an anomeric carbon signal (dC 96.7). The analysis of NMR data and
comparison with the reference revealed that 6 shared the same
b-orientation of 20-OH was confirmed by the strong ROESY corre-
lations from H-19 [dH 2.24 (1H, m)] to H-30 [dH 1.38 (3H, s)]. The
configurations of the remaining stereogenic centers were identical
to those of 2a, 3a, 23-trihydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid based on the
ROESY correlations of 3 (Fig. 4). Accordingly, the structure of 3
(Fig. 1) was defined as 2a, 3a, 20b, 23-tetrahydroxyurs-12-en-28-
ursolic acid.
Compound 4 was purified as white and amorphous powder. It
showed a molecular formula of C30H46O6 on the basis of the
Fig. 3. Key 1He1H COSY (
), HMBC (
), and NOE (
) correlations of 2.