Y. Zhang et al.
Phytochemistry Letters 26 (2018) 179–183
(
Bruker Co., Karlsruhe, Germany). NMR spectrum were performed on a
subsequently added to the solution to heat at 60 °C for 2 h. Then the
chloro trimethyl silane (0.3 mL) was added to the mixture and stirred
for another 2 h at 60 °C. After the reactions had been performed, the
supernatant was diluted 20 times and analysed by GC under the fol-
lowing conditions: the column temperature was maintained at 80 °C for
5 min, then increased from 80 to 280 °C (25 °C/min) and maintained for
Bruker ARX-300 or 600 spectrometer using TMS as the internal stan-
dard. HRESIMS were measured with a Bruker Daltonics Inc. micro-TOF-
Q spectrometer. HPLC separations were performed on a Hitachi 655-15
series pumping system equipped with a Hitachi L-2490 refractive index
detector using a YMC-Park ODS-A column (250 × 10 mm I.D, S-5 μm,
1
2 nm). GC separations were performed on an Agilent 7890 A Gas
2
5 min; the carrier gas was N (1.4 ml/min); the split ratio was 1/20; the
Chromatograph equipped with a SPH-300 A FID detector using an
Agilent 19091J-413 capillary column (30 m × 320 μm×0.25 μm).
injection temperature was 250 °C; and the injection volume was 1 μL.
The absolute configurations of the monosaccharides of 1 and 2 were
finally determined to be all D-glucose by comparing the retention times
with hose of the standard samples D-glucose (14.489 min) and L-glu-
cose (14.576 min).
3.2. Plant material
The leaves of A. elata were collected from Liaoning Province, China,
in August 2009 and were identified by Prof. Lu Jincai of Shenyang
Pharmaceutical University. A voucher specimen was deposited at the
School of Traditional Chinese Materia Medica (No. 090811).
3.6. α-glucosidase inhibition assay
The stock solutions of positive control and each test substances were
prepared in DMSO and further diluted with PBS to obtain an experi-
mental concentration. Enzyme solution was prepared using α-glucosi-
dase (0.5 U/mL, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in 0.2 M po-
tassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). The purified compound (80 μL) at
different concentrations was mixed with enzyme solution (80 μL) then
the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. The p-nitrophenyl-α-D-
glucopyranoside (40 μL, 1.5 mM) was added to the mixture as start of
3
.3. Extraction and isolation
The air-dried leaves (8 kg) of A. elata were extracted with 60%
ethanol firstly for three times under reflux. The combined solution were
concentrated under vacuum and subjected to macroporous resin D101
column chromatography, eluted with an EtOH-H O gradient. The so-
2
lution eluted with 60% ethanol was evaporated to dryness under va-
cuum to give a residue (800 g). The residue was chromatographied on
2 3
the reaction. After 30 min incubation at 37.0 °C, 0.1 M Na CO (50 μL)
silica gel with a CH
H). Fr. D was subjected to column chromatography on silica gel and
eluted using an increasing MeOH gradient in CH Cl (20–100%), to
provide twelve fractions (fr. D -D12). Fr. D was subjected to ODS
column chromatography and eluted with a MeOH-H O gradient to yield
1 fractions (fr. D5-1-D5-11). Among them, fr. D5-6 was purified by pre-
2
Cl
2
-MeOH gradient to afford eight fractions (fr. A-
was added to tube to terminate. The absorbance of yellow color pro-
duced due to the releasing of p-nitrophenol from the hydrolysis of p-
nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside. The sample was evaluated through
detecting the absorbance at 405 nm using a BIO-RAD Model 680 mi-
croplate reader. The non-enzymatic hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl-α-D-
glucopyranoside was corrected by detecting the addition in absorbance
at 405 nm obtained in the absence of α-glucosidase. Acarbose (Sigma,
St. Louis, MO, USA), a common α-glucosidase inhibitor, was used as a
positive control. The inhibition activity was expressed as percentage
inhibition of enzyme activity and was calculated using the following
equation: [1− (Asample−Ablank) / (Acontrol− Ablank)] × 100%. Asample is
the absorbance of the samples, Acontrol is the absorbance of PBS that
replaces the samples, Ablank is the absorbance of PBS that replaces the
samples and the enzyme. The IC50 values were calculated plotting
graphs with percentage inhibition on the y-axis and log concentrations
on x-axis using graph pad prism v 6.0. The IC50 values are reported as
best fit value after normalization of data (n = 3).
2
2
1
5
2
1
2
parative HPLC using MeOH-H O (v/v = 8:2) to give 3 (10 mg), 4
(
148 mg). Fr. D
with a solvent system MeOH-H
). Fr. D9-10 was further separated with silica gel column chromato-
graphy with a solvent system of CH Cl -MeOH-H O (v/v/v = 7:3:0.5)
to obtain 7 (345 mg), 10 (10 mg) and 13 (20 mg). Fr. D9-12 was purified
using Sephadex column chromatography and eluted with MeOH-H O to
give 8 (21 mg). Fr. E was fractionated using column chromatography on
silica gel and eluted with an increasing MeOH gradient in CH Cl
30–100%), led to nine fractions (fr. E -E ). Fr. E was applied to ODS
column chromatograph using a solvent system MeOH-H O to afford
9
was separated using ODS column chromatography
2
O to afford sixteen fractions (fr. D9-1-D9-
1
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
(
1
9
5
2
eighteen fractions (fr. E5-1-E5-19). Of these fractions, fr. E5-9 was sepa-
rated using silica gel column chromatography with a solvent system of
CH
2 (125 mg). Fr. E
with a solvent system MeOH-H
), the eighth fraction was subjected to silica gel column chromato-
graphy eluting with a solvent system of CH Cl -MeOH-H O (v/v/
v = 6:1:0.1) to yield 5 (60 mg), 6 (32 mg), 9 (180 mg) and 11 (205 mg).
2
Cl
2
-MeOH-H
2
O (v/v/v = 8:2:0.25) to give 1 (24 mg), 2 (15 mg) and
was purified using ODS column chromatography
O to obtain fifteen fractions (fr. E6-1-E6-
3.7. PTP1B inhibition assay
1
6
2
Buffer solution (pH 5.5) was composed of 50 mM citrate, 0.1 M
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). Stock solution (in
assay buffer containing 10% DMSO) of the test compounds (1 mM) and
positive control (100 μM) were prepared. Taking suitable aliquots from
the stock solution, five different concentrations were made by dilutions
(50-3.125 μM). The sample (10 μL), 10 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate
1
5
2
2
2
3.4. Characteristic data of the compounds 1 and 2
(
pNPP) (50 μL) and PTP1B (human recombinant) (40 μL, 0.1 U/mL,
Compound 1: white amorphous powder, IR (KBr) vmax: 3424, 1077
ProSpec-Tany TechnoGene Ltd., Ness Ziona, Israel) were added to each
well of a 96-well plate (final volume: 100 μL). After incubation at 37 °C
for 30 min, the reaction was terminated using 0.1 M NaOH (20 μL). p-
Nitrophenyl, the product generated by dephosphorylation of pNPP, can
be monitored at 405 nm using a BIO-RAD Model 680 microplate reader.
The non-enzymatic hydrolysis of 10 mM pNPP was corrected by de-
tecting the addition in absorbance at 405 nm obtained in the absence of
PTP1B enzyme. The PTP1B inhibitor oleanolic acid was used as a po-
−
1
+
and 1036 cm ; HRESIMS at m/z 997.4769 [M + Na] (calcd. for
1
13
C
48
H
78
O
20Na, 997.4769); H and C NMR, see Tables 1 and 2.
Compound 2: white amorphous powder, IR (KBr) vmax: 3422, 1078
−
1
+
and 1032 cm ; HRESIMS at m/z 1137.5680 [M+H] (calcd. for
1
13
54 89
C H O25, 1137.5687); H and C NMR, see Tables 1 and 2.
3.5. Acid hydrolysis of 1 and 2
sitive control. The equation used was: [(Ablank−Asample
)
Compounds 1 and 2 were heated with 2 M HCl (10 mL) at 95 °C for
h. The reaction mixture was extracted using CHCl (3 × 5 mL). The
3
residue was dissolved in pyridine (2 mL) after aqueous layer was eva-
porated to dryness. L-cysteine methyl ester hydrochloride (5 mg) was
/Ablank]×100%. The IC50 values were calculated plotting graphs with
percentage inhibition on the y-axis and log concentrations on x-axis
using graph pad prism v 6.0. The IC50 values are reported as best fit
value after normalization of data (n = 3).
4
182