X.-L. Zhao et al.
12
7
11
5
10
9
MS and HR-ESI-MS spectra were taken on a Q-TOF
Micro LC-MS-MS mass spectrometer (Waters Co, Mil-
ford, MA, USA).
1
3
O
2
4
Compound 1 was isolated as colorless oil with [α]2D5 + 125
(c 0.03, EtOH) and UV (EtOH) λmax nm (log ε): 233 (4.02).
Its molecular formula was determined to be C23H35NO9 by
HRESIMS at m/z 492.2207 [M + Na]+ (calcd as 492.2204 for
C23H35NO9Na) and NMR data (Table 1). In the IR spectrum
of 1, absorption at 3447, 3197, and 1689 cm−1 indicated the
presence of hydroxyl, imide, and carbonyl groups, respec-
tively. Analysis of 1H NMR spectrum (Table 1) of 1 revealed
the presence of three olefinic protons at δH 5.19 (1 H, br d, J
= 9.8 Hz), 5.48 (1 H, m), 5.82 (1 H, br d, J = 11.6 Hz), one
anomeric proton at δH 4.87 (1 H, d, J = 3.9 Hz), one oxyge-
nated methylene at δH 3.64 (1 H, dd, J = 11.9, 5.3 Hz), 3.78
(1 H, dd, J = 11.9, 2.1 Hz), five oxygenated methine protons
from δH 3.27 to δH 4.19, two olefinic methyls at δH 1.77 (3 H,
dd, J = 7.2, 2.6 Hz), 1.86 (3 H, d, J = 1.2 Hz), one
doublet aliphatic methyl at δH 1.14 (3 H, d, J = 6.8 Hz). The
13C NMR and DEPT135 spectra (Table 1) of 1 showed 23
resonances attributable to one carbonyl carbon at δC 212.1,
two amide carbonyl carbons at δC 175.4 and 175.4, three sp2
methines at δC 125.8, 129.7, 134.1, one sp2 quaternary carbon
at δC 136.7, one anomeric carbon at δC 99.1, five oxygen-
bearing aliphatic methines between 71.6 and 75.0 ppm, one
oxygenated methylene at δC 62.5, two aliphatic methines at δC
28.2, 48.2, four aliphatic methylenes at δC 37.9, 39.2, 41.4,
44.8, and three methyl carbons at δC 15.0, 16.7, 17.5. Com-
parison of the 1H and 13C NMR data (Table 1) of 1 with those
of 3 revealed significant similarities. The differences between
1 and 3 were that 1 showed six extra 13C resonances. The six
extra 13C resonances were postulated to glucose moiety
according to one doublet anomeric proton (δH 4.87), one
oxygenated methylene (δH 3.64, 3.78) and four oxygenated
1'
3'
6
8
HN
OR
O
5'
O
1 R = a-D-glucose
3 R = H
12
11
OH
1
3
O
2
4
5
9
7
1'
3'
10
8
6
HN
OH
O
5'
O
2
Fig. 1 Structures of compounds 1, 2, and 3
MeOH (3 l) and the supernatant was subjected to a Diaion
HP-20 resin (Mitsubushi Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) col-
umn eluting with 95% EtOH (5 l). The MeOH extract and
the EtOH eluents were evaporated under reduced pressure
at 55 °C to yield the crude extract. The crude extract was
chromatographed on a silica gel (Qingdao Haiyang Che-
mical Group, Qingdao, China; 100-200 mesh) column and
successively eluted with a stepwise gradient of CHCl3/
MeOH (100:0-50: 50, v/v) to give three fractions (Fr.1-
Fr.3) based on the TLC profiles. TLC was performed on
silica-gel plates (HSGF254, Yantai Chemical Industry
Research Institute, Yantai, China) with solvent system of
CHCl3/MeOH (9:1, v/v) and the developed TLC plates
were observed under a UV lamp at 254 nm or by heating
after spraying with sulfuric acid-ethanol, 5:95 (v/v). The
Fr.2 was subjected to another silica gel column eluted
with CHCl3/MeOH (95:5-60:40, v/v) to give six fractions
(Fr.2-1-Fr.2-6). The Fr.2-4 was further purified by semi-
preparative HPLC (Agilent 1100, Zorbax SB-C18, 5 μm,
3
methine protons. The relatively small JHH value (3.9 Hz) of
the anomeric proton suggested an α linkage [9]. The linkage
of the glucose to the aglycone was established by the HMBC
correlation (Fig. 2) from H-1″ to C-2. The NOESY correla-
tions (Fig. 2) between H-5 and H3-12, H-6 and H-8 demon-
strated the geometry of Δ6,7 was E. In the 1H NMR spectrum
of 1, the coupling constant between H-8 and H-9 was 11.6
Hz, indicating the geometry of Δ8,9 was Z. Furthermore, the
presence of glucose was evidenced by the acid hydrolysis.
Compound 1 (2.5 mg) was dissolved in 2 ml of 2 M HCl and
heated for 2 h at 80 °C, followed by neutralization with
NaHCO3. The reaction mixture was extracted with CHCl3 to
separate a sugar moiety-containing aqueous fraction from the
aglycone-containing fraction. The aqueous fraction was
identified by cochromatography with authentic glucose on
TLC analysis using ethyl acetate/pyridine/glacial acetic acid/
H2O (8: 5: 1: 1.5, v/v) as a developing solvent. Spots were
detected by heating after spraying with sulfuric acid-ethanol
(5:95, v/v). The identical Rf values of the aqueous fraction
250 × 9.4 mm inner diameter; 1.5 ml min−1
; 254 nm;
Agilent, PaloAlto, CA, USA) eluting with CH3CN/H2O
(20:80, v/v) to obtain compound 1 (tR 24.68 min, 18.0
mg). The Fr.2-3 was separated by semi-preparative HPLC
eluting with CH3CN/H2O (25:75, v/v) to afford compound
2 (tR 20.13 min, 14.2 mg). The Fr.1 was subjected to a
Sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare, Glies, UK) column
eluted with CHCl3/MeOH (1:1, v/v) and detected by TLC
to give two subfractions (Fr.1-1-Fr.1-2). The Fr.1-2 was
isolated by semi-preparative HPLC eluting with CH3CN/
H2O (35:65, v/v) to give compound 3 (tR 25.06 min, 23.5
mg). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were measured with a
Bruker DRX-400 (400 MHz for H and 100 MHz for 13C)
spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany). The ESI-
1