4958
P. Phuwapraisirisan et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 4956–4958
sponding hydrolysate named aegeline B (8a, Fig. 4), whose minus
140
120
100
80
26
IC50 35.8
μ
M
sign of specific rotation ([
a 20R-phenylethyl cinnamide.11
Compounds 1, 7 and 8 displayed slightly weak inhibition (30.1,
17.6 and 8.8%, respectively) against -glucosidase, even at concen-
tration of 10
g/mL (see Table 2).12 Of compounds isolated, anhyd-
roaegeline (2) turned out to be the most potent inhibitor
possessing IC50 value of 35.8 M (Fig. 5).
a
]
ꢀ20.6) was reminiscent to that of
D
a
l
60
l
40
In summary, we have isolated a variety of phenylethyl cinna-
mides, which included anhydromarmeline (1), aegelinosides A
20
(7) and
B (8), as a novel type of a-glucosidase inhibitors.
0
Although phenylethyl cinnamides have been commonly encoun-
tered in certain genus such as Aegle13 and Hibiscus,14 the pres-
ence of cis-cinnamide moiety in 8 is extraordinarily rare in
Nature. Recently Narender et al. have demonstrated that aegeline
(5), the related congener of 7 and 8, could serve as a potential
remedy for diabetes mellitus by suppressing blood glucose and
plasma triglyceride levels. Therefore they are likely to deserve
further development discovering new antidiabetes drugs having
dual functions.
0
20
40
60
80
100
Concentration (μM)
Figure 5. Inhibitory effect of anhydroaegeline (2) against
hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl -glucopyranoside.
a
-glucosidase on
a-D
amide (dC 162.7). Interpretation of 2D NMR resulted in the con-
struction of two separated aromatic systems, which were con-
nected through amide linkage. A monosubstituted benzene [dH
7.53 (2H) and 7.38 (3H)] was connected to trans-olefinic protons
[dH 7.75 (d, J = 15.2 Hz) and 6.44 (d, J = 15.2 Hz)], which were in
turn linked to amide carbon based on HMBC correlations from H-
2 and H-3 to C-1. The other aromatic motif was assigned to a
para-substituted benzene [dH 7.28 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H) and 6.86 (d,
J = 8.4 Hz, 2H)], which was accommodated by the oxygenated pre-
nyl (Me2C@CHCH2O–) and ethyleneamine (–CH@CH-NH–) moie-
ties. A large coupling constant (14.4 Hz) of olefinic protons (H-100
and H-200) pointed out that they were E-oriented. Therefore the
gross structure of anhydromarmeline (1) was depicted (see Fig. 2).
Aegelinoside A (7)8 was isolated from 7:3 MeOH–H2O extract
and displayed [M+Na]+ ion in HRESIMS at m/z 482.1781 that led
to molecular formula of C24H29NO8. The 1H NMR spectrum (Table
1) of 7 in CD3OD showed signals of aromatic and olefinic protons
in range of 6.6–7.6 (11H) and oxygenated methylenes and
methines (dH 3.0–5.2, 10H). The 13C NMR spectrum displayed 24
signals, which included resonance of amide (dC 166.5). The reso-
nances of dH 7.57 (m, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (m, 3H),
and 6.65 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H) were ascribable to trans-cinnamide
based on COSY and HMBC data. The signals at dH 7.35 (d,
J = 8.8 Hz, 2H) and 6.92 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H) were assigned to p-disub-
stituted benzene which was accommodated by methoxy group (dH
3.78 and dC 54.1) at C-60 and oxygenated ethyl amine moiety
(–OCH-CH2-NH–) at C-30. The HMBC cross peaks (Fig. 3) observed
for H-2, H-3, and H-10 to C-1 indicated that these two separated
aromatic systems were linked through amide bond. The remaining
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by Thailand Research Fund
(MRG5180158) and the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn Uni-
versity Fund (F-31-GS-ES13/28).
References and notes
1. Moller, D. E. Nature 2001, 414, 821.
2. For comprehensive reviews of natural a-glucosidase inhibitors, see: (a) Melo, E.
B.; Gomes, A. S.; Carvalho, I. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 10277; (b) Watson, A. A.; Fleet,
G. W. J.; Asano, N.; Molyneux, R. J.; Nash, R. J. Phytochemistry 2001, 56, 265.
3. Narender, T.; Shweta, S.; Tiwari, P.; Reddy, K. P.; Khaliq, T.; Prathipati, P.; Puri,
A.; Srivastava, A. K.; Chander, R.; Agarwal, S. C.; Raj, K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2007, 17, 1808.
4. For recent reports, see (a) Kesari, A. N.; Gupta, R. K.; Singh, S. K.; Diwakar, S.;
Watal, G. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 107, 374; (b) Panda, S.; Kar, A. Phytother. Res.
2006, 20, 1103; (c) Upadhya, S.; Shanbhag, K. K.; Suneetha, G.; Naidu, M. B.;
Upadhya, S. Indian J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2004, 48, 476.
5. Although several phenylethyl cinnamides have been isolated from A. marmelos,
many of which have not been given the IUPAC or trivial names, for the sage of
communication in this Letter, we adopted terms ‘marmeline’ for phenylethyl
cinnamides having 60-phenyloxyl and ‘aegeline’ for those having 60-methoxyl.
6. Anhydromarmeline (1): UV (MeOH) kmax (loge
) 277 (4.81), 333 (4.46); 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.74 (3H, s, H-500), 1.80 (3H, s, H-400), 4.50 (2H, d, J = 6.8 Hz,
H-100), 5.49 (1H, m, H-300), 6.14 (1H, d, J = 14.4 Hz, H-30), 6.44 (1H, d, J = 15.2 Hz,
H-2), 6.86 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-50 and H-70), 7.28 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-40 and H-
80), 7.38 (3H, m, H-6, H-7 and H-8), 7.53 (3H, m, H-5, H-9 and H-10), 7.75 (1H, d,
J = 15.2 Hz, H-3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 18.2 (C-500), 25.8 (C-400), 65.4 (C-
100), 113.2 (C-30), 115.0 (C-50 and C-70), 119.7 (C-2), 119.9 (C-200), 126.7 (C-40
and C-80), 128.0 (C-5 and C-9), 129.1 (C-6 and C-8), 130.1 (C-7), 132.4 (C-4),
137.5 (C-10), 138.3 (C-300), 143.8 (C-3), 158.1 (C-60), 162.7 (C-1); HRESIMS m/z
[M+Na]+ 356.1623 (calcd for C24H29NO8Na, 356.1626).
oxygenated methylenes and methines were assigned to b-D-glu-
cose residue, which was attached to C-20 based on HMBC correla-
tion from H-100 (4.12, d, J = 7.2 Hz) to C-20. Therefore overall
structure of 7 was accomplished. The absolute configuration of
C-20 was determined by chemical degradation. Hydrolysis of 7 in
7. Phuwapraisirisan, P.; Udomchotphruet, S.; Surapinit, S.; Tip-pyang, S. Nat. Prod.
Res. 2006, 20, 1332.
8. Aegelinoside A (7): [
25
a
]
ꢀ26.3 (c 0.05, MeOH); UV (MeOH) kmax (loge) 274
D
(4.73); 1H and 13C NMR (see Table 1); HRESIMS m/z [M+Na]+ 482.1781 (calcd
for C24H29NO8Na, 482.1791).
1 M HCl under reflux yielded
of which was identical in all respects, particularly optical rotation
D
-glucose and (ꢀ)-aegeline; the latter
9. Kamal, A.; Shaik, A. A.; Sandbhor, M.; Malik, M. S. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2004,
15, 3939.
10. Aegelinoside B (8): [
25
26
25
a
]
ꢀ33.3 (c 0.05, MeOH); UV (MeOH) kmax (loge) 260
D
([a
]
ꢀ27.6), to R-aegeline (lit.[
a]
ꢀ35.9)9.
D
D
(4.43); 1H and 13C NMR (see Table 1); HRESIMS m/z [M+Na]+ 482.1786 (calcd
for C24H29NO8Na, 482.1791).
Aegelinoside B (8)10 was isomeric to 7 as evidenced by a molec-
ular formula of C24H29NO8. Although direct comparison of their 1H
and 13C NMR spectra could not be made since they were recorded
in different solvents, 8 revealed signals essentially identical to
those of 7. Significant difference observed by us was slightly up-
field olefinic protons H-2 (6.05, d, J = 12.8 Hz) and H-3 (6.68, d,
J = 12.8 Hz). A relative small coupling constant (J23 = 12.8 Hz) indi-
cated that D2 in 8 was cis-oriented instead of trans-oriented in 7.
The gross structure of 8 was subsequently confirmed by 2D NMR
data. The absolute configuration of C-20 was also deduced by chem-
11. Optically pure phenylethyl amides having only one chiral secondary alcohol
revealed different signs of specific rotation; (ꢀ) for R and (+) for S isomers. For
certain instances, see Ref. 9.
12. The inhibitory effects of isolated compounds were validated using previous
protocol with slight modification. For detailed experiment, see: Schäfer, A.;
Högger, P. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2007, 77, 41.
13. (a) Govindachari, T. R.; Premila, M. S. Phytochemistry 1983, 22, 755; (b) Sharma,
B. R.; Rattan, R. K.; Sharma, P. Phytochemistry 1981, 20, 2606; (c) Manandhar,
M. D.; Shoeb, A.; Kapil, R. S.; Popli, S. P. Phytochemistry 1978, 17, 1814; (d) Basu,
D.; Sen, R. Phytochemistry 1974, 13, 2329; (e) Shoeb, A.; Kapil, R. S.; Popli, S. P.
Phytochemistry 1973, 12, 2071.
14. Seca, A. M. L.; Silva, A. M. S.; Silvestre, A. J. D.; Cavaleiro, J. A. S.; Domingues, F.
M. J.; Pascoal-Neto, C. Phytochemistry 2001, 58, 1219.
ical degradation. Acid hydrolysis of 8 afforded D-glucose and corre-