November 2009
1229
CHCl3. The non-alkaloid layer (HCC) was condensed to obtain a brown
H-2ꢃ, -6ꢃ), 6.78 (1H, d, Jꢁ8.4 Hz, H-5), 6.71 (2H, d, Jꢁ8.6 Hz, H-3ꢃ, -5ꢃ),
5.00 (1H, br s, OH), 3.49 (2H, t, Jꢁ7.5 Hz, CH2-8ꢃ), 2.78 (2H, t, Jꢁ7.5 Hz,
CH2-7ꢃ); 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz) d: 170.3 (C-7), 156.9 (C-4ꢃ), 150.0
(C-4), 146.3 (C-3), 131.5 (C-1ꢃ), 130.8 (C-2ꢃ, -6ꢃ), 127.2 (C-1), 120.5 (C-6),
116.3 (C-3ꢃ, -5ꢃ), 115.8 (C-5), 115.7 (C-2), 42.9 (C-8ꢃ), 35.9 (C-7ꢃ); EI-MS
m/z 273 [M]ꢆ (38); HR-EI-MS m/z: 273.1004 [M]ꢆ (Calcd for C15H15NO2,
273.1001).
Acid Hydrolysis of 1 A solution of all houttuynoside A (1) (1 mg) in
0.2 M HCl (dioxane–H2O, 1 : 1, 2.0 ml) was heated at 95 °C for 1 h under an
Ar atmosphere. The reaction mixture was chromatographed on a Sephadex
LH-20 column eluted with H2O to afford the sugar fraction. The sugar frac-
tion was analyzed by HPLC under the following conditions: column,
Aminex HPX-87H (7.8 mm i.d.ꢅ300 mm, 5 mm, Bio-Rad Laboratories,
Hercules, CA, U.S.A.); solvent, 5 mM H2SO4; flow rate, 0.6 ml/min; detec-
tion, RI and OR. Identification of D-glucose present in the sugar fraction was
carried out by comparison of its retention time and polarity with those of an
authentic sample: tR (min), 8.99 (D-glucose, positive polarity).
Cell Culture and Viruses Vero cells were cultured in minimal essential
medium (MEM; GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, U.S.A.) supplement with 10%
fetal calf serum (FCS; Hyclone, Logan, UT, U.S.A.), 100 U/ml penicillin,
and 100 mg/ml streptomycin and incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator.
To prepare HSV-1 (KOS strain, VR-1493, ATCC) stocks, Vero cells were in-
fected by HSV-1 at a multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) of 3 plaque forming
units (PFU)/cell and harvested at 24 h postinfection and centrifuged at
1500ꢅg (Centrifuge 5810 R, Eppendorf) at 4 °C for 20 min. The supernatant
was collected and stored at ꢀ70 °C for use.
Plaque Reduction Assay The assay followed procedures described pre-
viously.35) Vero cells (3.5ꢅ105/dish) were overlaid with test compounds
(100 mM) and 100 plaque forming units (PFU) of HSV-1 were added to each
dish. The viruses were adsorbed for 1 h at 37 °C and 1% methylcellulose was
added to each well. After 5 d, the virus plaques formed in Vero cells were
counted by crystal violet staining. The activities of test compounds and
acyclovir for inhibition of plaque formation were calculated.
syrup (90 g). The acidic water-soluble part was neutralized with NH4OH(aq)
,
partitioned with CHCl3, and afforded alkaloidal layer (18 g, HCA). The
HCC layer was eluted with step gradient mixtures of CHCl3 and CH3OH
(29 : 1 to 0 : 1) to afford nine fractions. Fraction 2 was chromatographed over
silica gel column chromatography using CHCl3–CH3OH (99 : 1 to 0 : 1) as
step gradient mixtures as eluents and further purified by repeated column
chromatography to give successively 4 (3.3 mg), 9 (2.5 mg), 33 (4.7 mg), and
a mixture of 35 and 36 (2.1 mg). Fraction 3 was chromatographed on silica
gel and eluted with CHCl3–MeOH (19 : 1) to give 10 (3.8 mg). Fraction 4
was further subjected to column chromatography over silica gel using step-
wise gradients of diisopropyl ether–acetone (34 : 1 to 0 : 1) and then was fur-
ther isolated on the chromatography to afford 3 (4.1 mg), 5 (4.8 mg), 13
(1.4 mg), and 16 (3.7 mg). Fraction 5 was chromatographed on silica gel
eluting with step gradient mixtures of diisopropyl ether–CH3OH (5 : 1 to
0 : 1) and then purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography to afford 11
(2.1 mg). Fraction 6 was purified on silica gel column using stepwise gradi-
ents of CHCl3–MeOH (6 : 1 to 0 : 1) as eluents to produce 8 (1.2 mg) and 38
(29.0 mg). Fraction 8 was separated on a silica gel column chromatography
using CHCl3–MeOH–H2O (39 : 1 : 0.1 to 0 : 1 : 0.1) as step gradient mixtures
as eluents to occur the white precipitate, which was recrystallized by
CH3OH to yield 25 (2.1 g). The HCA layer (18 g) was chromatographed on a
silica gel column eluting with step gradients of CHCl3–CH3OH (99 : 1 to
0 : 1) as eluents to give nine fractions. Fraction 2 was separated on a silica
gel column chromatography and further purified by preparative TLC with n-
hexane–ethyl acetate (9 : 1) to obtain 29 (2.3 mg) and 30 (1.2 mg). Purifica-
tion of fraction 6 on a silica gel column chromatography eluting with a step
gradient of diisopropyl ether–ethyl acetate (14 : 1 to 1 : 1) as eluents and fur-
ther separated by preparative TLC to obtain 34 (0.9 mg). Fraction 7 was sub-
jected to column chromatography over a silica gel using a stepwise gradient
of n-hexane–ethyl acetate (1 : 1 to 0 : 1) as eluents and then was further puri-
fied on the chromatography to afford 7 (1.8 mg) and 21 (1.2 mg). Purifica-
tion of the fraction 8 by silica gel with n-hexane–ethyl acetate (1 : 1 to 0 : 1)
as step gradient mixtures as eluents and then purified by preparative thin-
layer chromatography with CHCl3–MeOH (9 : 1) to afford 15 (2.1 mg), 31
(2.5 mg), and 28 (2.4 mg).
Antioxidant Assay The antioxidant assay was based on methods re-
ported by Mellors and Tappel.36) The percentage values of inhibition were
recorded after incubating for 30 min.
The n-BuOH layer (100 g) was chromatographed over reversed-phase Di-
aion HP-20 gel using H2O–CH3OH as step gradients, and afforded seven
fractions. Fraction 2 was subjected to silica gel column chromatography
using diisopropyl ether–CH3OH (5 : 1 to 0 : 1) as step gradient mixtures as
eluents to afford 19 (7.5 mg). Fraction 3 was purified on a silica gel column
using CHCl3–CH3OH (7 : 1) as step gradients as eluent to yield 32 (1.7 mg).
Fraction 4 was separated on a silica gel column chromatography with
CHCl3–CH3OH–H2O (5 : 1 : 0.1) and further purified by preparative TLC to
obtain successively 17 (2.0 mg), 22 (4.2 mg), 23 (5.2 mg), 24 (3.0 mg) and
37 (6.0 mg). Fraction 5 was separated using a silica gel column with step
gradients of diisopropyl ether–CH3OH–H2O (5 : 1 : 0.1 to 0 : 1 : 0.1) as eluent
to give four fractions. Fraction 5-2 occurring the white precipitate was re-
crystallized by CH3OH to yield 26 (0.9 g). The subfraction 5-3 was sepa-
rated on a silica gel column chromatography and further purified by prepara-
tive TLC with CHCl3–CH3OH–H2O (7 : 1 : 0.1) to give 14 (1.8 mg), 20
(1.9 mg), and 2 (2.3 mg). Fraction 6 was subjected to column chromatogra-
phy over a silica gel using stepwise gradients of diisopropyl ether–CH3OH–
H2O (12 : 1 : 0.1 to 0 : 1 : 0.1) as eluents and then was further purified by
preparative TLC with CHCl3–CH3OH–H2O (4 : 1 : 0.1) to afford 27 (6.0 mg),
18 (2.1 mg), and 1 (2.8 mg).
Antityrosinase Assay The antityrosinase assay was based on the
method of Bernard and Berthon.37)
Acknowledgements The authors are grateful for financial support from
the National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China (NSC 96-2628-M-
006-002) awarded to T. S. Wu.
References
1) Hayashi K., Kamiya M., Hayashi T., Planta Med., 61, 237—241
(1995).
2) Li G. Z., Chai O. H., Lee M. S., Han E. H., Kim H. T., Song C. H.,
Biol. Pharm. Bull., 28, 1864—1868 (2005).
3) Chang J. S., Chiang L. C., Chen C. C., Liu L. T., Wang K. C., Lin C.
C., Am. J. Chin. Med., 29, 303—312 (2001).
4) Kim S. K., Ryu S. Y., No J., Choi S. U., Kim Y. S., Arch. Pharm. Res.,
24, 518—521 (2001).
5) Wang D., Yu Q. H., Eikstadt P., Hammond D., Feng Y., Chen N., In-
tern. Immunopharmacol., 2, 1411—1418 (2002).
6) Cho E. J., Yokozawa T., Rhyu D. Y., Kim S. C., Shibahara N., Park J.
C., Phytomedicine, 10, 554—551 (2003).
7) Priestap H. A., Phytochemistry, 24, 849—852 (1985).
8) Lo W. L., Chang F. R., Wu Y. C., J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 47, 1251—1256
(2000).
Houttuynoside A (1): Colorless syrup; [a]D25 ꢀ21.0° (cꢁ0.06, MeOH);
UV (MeOH) lmax (log e) 320 (2.54), 257 (2.54), 211 (3.51) nm; IR (KBr)
n
max 3392 (OH), 1688 (CO) cmꢀ1; 1H-NMR (acetone-d6, 300 MHz) d: 10.37
(1H, br s, OH), 7.88 (2H, d, Jꢁ8.6 Hz, H-2ꢂ, -6ꢂ), 7.50 (1H, d, Jꢁ2.9 Hz, H-
2), 7.33 (1H, dd, Jꢁ9.0, 2.9 Hz, H-6), 6.90 (2H, d, Jꢁ8.6 Hz, H-3ꢃ, -5ꢂ),
6.79 (1H, d, Jꢁ9.0 Hz, H-5), 4.90 (1H, d, Jꢁ7.2 Hz, H-1ꢃ), 4.70 (1H, dd,
Jꢁ11.7, 1.5 Hz, H-6ꢃ), 4.33 (1H, dd, Jꢁ11.7, 7.2 Hz, H-6ꢃ), 3.84 (3H, s,
OCH3-7), 3.82 (1H, m, H-5ꢃ), 3.58—3.46 (3H, m, H-2ꢃ, -3ꢃ, -4ꢃ); 13C-NMR
(acetone-d6, 100 MHz) d: 170.2 (C-7), 165.8 (C-7ꢂ), 162.1 (C-4ꢂ), 157.1 (C-
2), 150.3 (C-1), 131.8 (C-2ꢂ, -6ꢂ), 126.3 (C-4), 121.7 (C-1ꢂ), 118.1 (C-3),
117.6 (C-6), 115.3 (C-3ꢂ, -5ꢂ), 112.3 (C-5), 102.4 (C-1ꢃ), 77.1 (C-3ꢃ), 74.5
(C-5ꢃ), 73.9 (C-2ꢃ), 70.9 (C-4ꢃ), 64.0 (C-6ꢃ), 52.2 (OCH3-7); FAB-MS m/z:
451 [MꢆH]ꢆ; HR-FAB-MS m/z: 451.1244 [MꢆH]ꢆ (Calcd for C21H23O11,
451.1240).
9) Achari B., Bandyopadhyay S., Chakravarty A. K., Pakrashi S. C., Org.
Magn. Reson., 22, 741—746 (1984).
10) Chen C. Y., Chang F. R., Wu Y. C., J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 44, 313—319
(1997).
11) Bate R. B., Janda K. D., Synthesis, 4, 310—311 (1984).
12) Ghosh P., Ghosh M. K., Thakur S., Dan J., Akihisa T., Tamura T.,
Kimura Y., Phytochemisry, 37, 757—760 (1994).
13) Lampert H., Mikenda W., Karpfen A., Kahlig H., J. Phys. Chem. A,
101, 9610—9617 (1997).
14) Pouchert C. J., Behnke J., “The Aldrich Library of 13C and 1H FTNMR
Spectra,” Vol. 2, Aldrich Chemical Company Inc., New York, 1993, p.
1394C.
Houttuynamide A (2): Colorless syrup; UV (MeOH) lmax (log e) 286
(3.90), 278 (3.90), 258 (4.10), 205 (4.60) nm; IR (KBr) nmax 3353 (OH),
15) Kergomard A., Renard M. F., Agric. Biol. Chem., 50, 2913—2914
(1986).
16) Miles H. T., Smyrniotis P. Z., Stadtman E. R., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 81,
1
2924, 1700 (CO), 1612 cmꢀ1; H-NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) d: 7.24 (1H, d,
Jꢁ2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.15 (1H, dd, Jꢁ8.4, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 7.06 (2H, d, Jꢁ8.6 Hz,