J.H. Yun et al.
Dyes and Pigments 190 (2021) 109297
The lowest absorption energies of 2TrzSi and 2CzTrzSi corresponding to
HOMO-LUMO gap were 4.12 and 3.65 eV, respectively.
between the LUMO and optical HOMO-LUMO gap from UV–Vis ab-
sorption spectra, while that of 2CzTrzSi was obtained from onset value
of oxidation potential (Figure S2) as the 2CzTrzSi is a CT type material.
The HOMO/LUMO of 2TrzSi and 2CzTrzSi were ꢀ 7.36/-3.24 and
ꢀ 6.40/-3.32 eV, respectively. The LUMO levels were similar because the
same triazine unit was employed as the electron deficient unit, but the
HOMO level of 2CzTrzSi was shallower than 2TrzSi due to the carbazole
moiety. The experimental energy level analysis results were well
correlated with a molecular orbital simulation result by B3LYP 6-31G
(Becke, 3-parameter, Lee–Yang–Parr 6-31G) basis set in Fig. 5. The
HOMO and LUMO frontier molecular orbitals of 2TrzSi were spread over
the diphenyltriazine unit through the tetraphenylsilane backbone
structure. However, the HOMO of 2CzTrzSi was predominantly local-
ized on the carbazole. The HOMO/LUMO energy levels from the mo-
lecular orbital calculation were ꢀ 6.60/-1.83 and ꢀ 5.76/-1.95 eV in the
2TrzSi and 2CzTrzSi, respectively, which followed the trend of the
experimentally validated energy levels. The singlet and triplet energies
were also kept on the experimentally determined emission energies. All
calculated data are summarized in Table 1.
The solid state PL emission of the hosts was further studied to figure
out the complex formation with p-type host in the mixed host because
the 2TrzSi and 2CzTrzSi hosts were developed as n-type hosts. The
fluorescence spectra of the mixed film of p-type and n-type hosts were
compared with those of neat films of each host to verify the exciplex
formation. Carbazole based conventional host, 3,3-di(9H-carbazol-9-yl)
biphenyl (mCBP), was used as the p-type host. The emission spectra of
the mixed host films (Fig. 2), mCBP:2TrzSi and mCBP:2CzTrzSi, re-
flected the PL emission of each host without indistinctive red-shift,
indicating no exciplex formation. Two host materials can be justified
as exciplex free type mixed host. In the case of 2TrzSi, donor-acceptor
interaction between carbazole of mCBP and triazine of 2TrzSi caused
the slight red shift of the emission spectrum in the mixed film. Whereas,
the slight blue shift of the emission spectrum of 2CzTrzSi is due to
suppressed intermolecular interaction between 2CzTrzSi molecules by
the mCBP host.
Transient PL (TRPL) of 2CzTrzSi in Fig. 3 was measured to assess the
thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) characteristic of
2CzTrzSi because the singlet-triplet energy gap was small. A clear
Thermal properties like glass transition temperature (Tg) and ther-
mal decomposition temperature (Td) are depicted in Figure S3. The Tgs
were 118 and 153 ◦C, the Tds were 442 and 526 ◦C in 2TrzSi and
2CzTrzSi, respectively. The Tg and Td of 2CzTrzSi were higher than those
of 2TrzSi due to the large molecular weight and intermolecular inter-
action induced CT character. The two host materials showed high Td for
good thermal stability in device fabrication process and high Tg for
stable device operation.
delayed fluorescence with an excited state lifetime of 15.5
μs was
observed in the TRPL decay data, suggesting that the 2CzTrzSi is a TADF
type host for the mixed host.
The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) was calculated
from onset value of reduction potential by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in
Fig. 4. The HOMO of 2TrzSi was determined from the difference
Based on the material characteristics, the 2TrzSi and 2CzTrzSi were
used as the n-type hosts in blue PhOLEDs with mCBP as a p-type host.
The mixed host was composed of n-type: p-type host (50:50) and Ir(cb)3
[35] was utilized as a blue triplet emitter at 20% doping concentration.
The device energy diagram and molecular structure of fac-tris(5-(tert--
butyl)-1,3-diphenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyrazine)iridium (Ir
(cb)3) are represented at Fig. 6. A planar type triazine based DBFTrz [28]
reported in our previous paper was a reference n-type host. The current
density (J) and luminance (L) plots against voltage (V) are presented in
Fig. 7(a). The J of the mCBP:2TrzSi and mCBP:2CzTrzSi was similar, but
high J was observed in the mCBP:DBFTrz device. This was well corre-
lated with electron transport properties of the hosts. The single carrier
device data in Figure S4 confirmed the electron transport property and
the electron current density of hosts were in the order of DBFTrz >
2TrzSi ≈ 2CzTrzSi. The high electron current density of DBFTrz is
related with the planar molecular structure by hydrogen bonding be-
tween diphenyltriaizne and dibenzofuran. The 2TrzSi and 2CzTrzSi
showed low electron current density because the diphenylsilyl backbone
structure favors tetrahedral geometry. The tetrahedral structure hinders
molecular orbital overlap between molecules, retarding the electron
transport of the hosts. The optimized geometry of 2TrzSi and 2CzTrzSi is
given in the Figure S5. The turn-on voltage of three mixed host devices
were under 2.7 V and driving voltage at 10/100/1000 cdm-2 of the
mCBP:2TrzSi and mCBP:2CzTrzSi devices were 3.1/3.6/4.5 and
3.1/3.6/4.7 V. The turn-on and driving voltages of blue PhOLED devices
were low by transporting carriers separately without energy barrier by
mixing the mCBP and n-type hosts.
The maximum EQEs of the mCBP:2TrzSi and mCBP:2CzTrzSi devices
were 21.4 and 20.7%, respectively. The EQEs at 100/500/1,000 cd/mꢀ 2
were 21.3/21.2/20.5% in mCBP:2TrzSi and 20.7/20.4/19.8% in
mCBP:2CzTrzSi devices. The mCBP:2TrzSi device maintained the high
EQE over 20% even at high luminance and the EQE of the
mCBP:2CzTrzSi device was still high though it was slightly declined
under 20%, indicating the efficiency drop at high luminance was
improved. The mCBP:DBFTrz device showed poor maximum EQE of
9.7% because the energy transfer from host to guest was inefficient due
to the low triplet energy of DBFTrz (2.94 eV) in film state. The EQE plots
are described in Fig. 7(b) and device performances are summarized in
Table 2.
Fig. 2. Film PL spectra of (a) mCBP:2TrzSi and (b) mCBP:2CzTrzSi in com-
parison with those of mCBP, 2TrzSi and 2CzTrzSi.
3