7732 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 107, No. 31, 2003
Rajasekar et al.
at low temperatures, while the rest adsorbs in a dissociated state.
XPS analyses of the C 1s photoelectron peak following
submonolayer exposure at low temperatures suggest that mo-
lecular adsorption for BrCN is higher (60%) than that of ClCN
(40%). The fraction of molecular BrCN is larger than the 25%
found for ICN adsorption on Si(100),1 possibly due to the
stronger Br-CN bond. However, this possibility does not
explain the large degree of dissociation found for low-temper-
ature ClCN adsorption on Si(100) with respect to BrCN. We
propose, based on the low-temperature XPS uptake experiments,
that molecular ClCN has a lower sticking probability with
respect to ICN and BrCN and that this lower sticking probability
results in the disproportional buildup of the dissociated species.
The dissociated species forms due to the relatively weak X-CN
bond. Consistent with this idea, the C2N2 and aromatic (HCN)3
molecules adsorb without dissociation on the Si(100) surface
at low temperatures.6,8 For low-temperature HCN adsorption
on Si(100), HCN, HCNH, and CN species could be identified
along with HCN dimers.5 In contrast, the Si(100) surface after
low-temperature adsorption of BrCN and ClCN contains only
the molecular and one dissociated species with an intact CN
group on Si(100).
Acknowledgment. We acknowledge the support of this work
by Oklahoma State University Center for Energy Research and
by the Research Corporation. Lucas Ward acknowledges sum-
mer support through OSU’s Department of Physics and its NSF
funded REU program.
References and Notes
(1) Rajasekar, P.; Kadossov, E. B.; Watt, T.; Materer, N. F. Surf. Sci.
2002, 515, 421.
(2) Kadossov, E. B.; Rajasekar, P.; Materer, N. F. Chem. Phys. Lett.
2003, 370, 548.
(3) Lu, X.; Lin, L. M. Int. ReV. Phys. Chem. 2002, 21, 137.
(4) Bacalzo-Gladden, F.; Musaev, D. G.; Lin, M. C. J. Chin. Chem.
Soc. (Taipei) 1999, 46, 395.
(5) Bu, Y.; Ma, L.; Lin, M. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 7081.
(6) Bu, Y.; Ma, L.; Lin, M. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 1046.
(7) Bu, Y.; Ma, L.; Lin, M. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 11797.
(8) Bu, Y.; Lin, M. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 7871.
(9) Materer, N. F.; Watt, T. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2002, 20, 572.
(10) Bak, B.; Hillebert, A. Cyanogen Iodide. In Organic Synthese;
Rabjohn, N., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1963.
(11) Cyanogen Chloride. In Handbook of PreparatiVe Inorganic Chem-
istry, 2nd ed.; Brauer, G., Ed.; Academic Press: 1963; Vol. 1; p 662.
(12) Popov, C.; Plass, M. F.; Bergmaier, A.; Kulisch, W. Appl. Phys.
1999, A69, 241.
The C 1s and N 1s photoelectron peaks found after BrCN
and ClCN exposure at room temperature on Si(100) are similar
to those found for ICN and support the existence of intact CN
function groups.1 As in the case of ICN, no contributions are
found from the molecularly adsorbed species. The UPS spectra
of BrCN and ClCN are more complicated than that of ICN due
to the contribution of adsorbed atomic Br and Cl on the surface.
However, for both BrCN and ClCN, the CN species bonded to
the Si(100) surface contributes only a single peak (6.0 eV) due
to the π-electrons in CN bond to the UPS spectra. This result
indicates that the Br-CN and Cl-CN bonds break, while the
CN bond remains intact during room-temperature adsorption
on Si(100). Upon annealing the CN saturated Si(100) surface
to higher temperatures, the UPS and XPS spectra indicate that
the CN triple bond starts to disappear at approximately 470 K.
Simultaneous changes in the C 1s and N 1s photoelectron peaks
between 470 and 800 K are consistent with the idea that CN
bond cleavage is correlated with silicon carbide and nitride
formation. By 800 K, all adsorbed CN species decompose
completely into silicon carbide and nitride. These annealing
results are similar with the results obtained for the CN-saturated
Si(100) surface prepared by using ICN1 and other analogous
CN-containing systems.5-7
(13) Hammer, P.; Lacerda, R. G.; Droppa, J. R.; Alvarez, F. Diamond
Relat. Mater. 2000, 9, 577.
(14) Bondino, F.; Baraldi, A.; Comelli, G.; Netzer, F. P. Surf. Sci. 2000,
461, 31.
(15) Davis, D. D.; Okabe, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 5526.
(16) Dean, J. A. Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry, 14 ed.; McGraw-
Hill: New York, 1992.
(17) Eland, J. H. D.; Baltzer, P.; Lundqvist; Wannberg, B.; Karlsson,
L. Chem. Phys. 1996, 212, 457.
(18) Eland, J. H. D.; Baltzer, P.; Karlsson, L.; Wannberg, B. Chem.
Phys. 1997, 222, 229.
(19) Heilbronner, E.; Hornung, V.; Muszkat, K. A. HelV. Chim. Acta
1970, 53, 347.
(20) Hollas, J. M.; Sutherley, T. A. Mol. Phys. 1971, 22, 213.
(21) Kovac, B. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 4231.
(22) Lake, R. F.; Thompson, H. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 1970, 317,
187.
(23) Yee, D. S. C.; Brion, C. E. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom.
1976, 8, 313.
(24) Jones, R. G.; Kadodwala, M. Surf. Sci. Lett. 1997, 370, L219.
(25) Kruger, B.; Benndorf, C. Surf. Sci. 1986, 177, 515.
(26) PHI Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; 1977.
(27) Johansson, L. S. O.; Uhrberg, R. I. G.; Lindsay, R.; Wincott, P.
L.; Thornton, G. Phys. ReV. B 1990, 42, 9534.
(28) Martin-Gago, J. A.; Roman, E.; Refolio, M. C.; Lopez-Sancho, J.
M.; Rubio, J.; Hellner, L.; Comelli, G. Surf. Sci. 1999, 424, 82.