Table 1 Comparison between the direct CL reaction and DNP-catalyzed nucleophilic CL reaction in the absence of base catalysts
Direct
DNP-catalyzed nucleophilic
τmax
H O
DNPO
Fast
Slow
Dominates in excess concentration
Dominates in low concentration
CL intensity decreases with its addition
CL intensity decreases with its addition
Dominates in relatively low concentration
Dominates in excess concentration
CL intensity increases with its addition
CL intensity increases with its addition
2
2
H O
2
DNP
(
direct CL reaction) and the slow decay curve (DNP-catalyzed
from DNPO molecules formed in the DNP-catalyzed CL
reaction might not be significant because large DNP concen-
trations produced from both the direct CL reaction and
DNP-catalyzed CL reaction act to inhibit (quench) the
two DNPO-CL reaction pathways. Table 1 summarizes the
major differences between the direct CL reaction and the
DNP-catalyzed CL reaction.
CL reaction) as shown previously in Figs. 3 and 4. The effect of
H O for each reactive condition (direct CL reaction: [DNPO] =
0
2
.01 mM, [H O ] = 34.0 mM, [perylene] = 0.025 mM; DNP-
2 2
catalyzed CL reaction: [DNPO] = 3.0 mM, [H O ] = 10.0 mM,
2
2
[perylene] = 0.025 mM) in acetonitrile was then investigated
(
data not shown). The results obtained under both reaction
conditions were consistent with those shown in Figs. 3 and 4. In
other words, the intensity obtained from the direct CL reaction
in the presence of H O decreased, whereas the intensity shown
Acknowledgements
2
in the DNP-catalyzed CL reaction with H O increased. The
2
This research was partially funded with the support of the US
Department of Energy (DOE) Cooperative Agreement No.
DE-FC04-95AL85832 with the Amarillo National Resource
Center for Plutonium (ANRCP). However, any opinions, find-
ings, conclusions or recommendations expressed herein are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of
DOE or ANRCP.
decay curve observed under either the direct CL reaction or the
DNP-catalyzed CL reaction in aqueous solution is obtained
from two competitive reaction pathways (the direct CL reaction
and the hydrolysis reaction of DNPO, or the DNP-catalyzed
nucleophilic CL reaction and the hydrolysis reaction of
DNPO). Therefore, DNP generated from the hydrolysis reac-
tion of DNPO with low water content acts as a quencher in the
direct CL reaction and acts as a nucleophile in the DNP-
catalyzed CL reaction.
References
1
2
3
4
L. J. Kricka and G. G. G. Thorp, Analyst, 1983, 108, 1274.
K. Honda and K. Imai, Anal. Chem., 1983, 55, 940.
J. K. DeVasto and M. L. Grayeski, Analyst, 1991, 116, 443.
M. M. Rauhut, L. J. Bollyky, B. G. Roberts and M. J. Loy, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1967, 89, 6515.
F. McCapra, K. Perring, R. J. Hart and R. A. Hann, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1981, 22, 5087.
C. L. R. Catherall, T. F. Palmer and R. B. Cundall, J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 2, 1984, 80, 823.
M. Orlovic, R. L. Schowen, R. S. Givens, F. Alvarez, B. Matuszeski
and N. Parekih, J. Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 3606.
Conclusions
Based on the present results observed under the most
fundamental PO-CL reaction conditions, we propose possible
high energy intermediates formed in DNPO-CL reactions in
the absence of catalysts (Scheme 1). The CL effects observed
5
6
7
8
9
F. Alvarez, N. J. Parekh, B. Matuszeski, R. S. Givens, T. Higuchi and
R. L. Schowen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 6435.
H. P. Chokshi, M. Barbush, R. G. Carlson, R. S. Givens, T. Kuwana
and R. L. Schowen, Biomed. Chromatogr., 1990, 4, 96.
1
1
1
1
0 R. E. Milofsky and J. W. Birks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113,
715.
1 J. H. Lee, S. Y. Lee and K.-J. Kim, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1996, 329,
17.
2 M. Stigbrand, E. Ponten and K. Irgum, Anal. Chem., 1994, 66,
766.
9
1
1
3 C. V. Stevani, D. F. Lima, V. G. Toscano and W. J. Baader, J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1996, 989.
1
1
4 A. G. Hadd and J. W. Birks, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 2657.
5 J. H. Lee, J. C. Rock, S. B. Park, M. A. Schlautman and
E. R. Carraway, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2002, 802.
6 J. H. Espenson, Chemical kinetics and reaction mechanism, 2nd edn.;
McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995.
7 A. G. Hadd and J. W. Birks, Mechanism and Analytical Detection;
R. E. Sievers, Ed.; John Wiley and Sons, 1995, New York,
p. 222.
1
1
1
1
2
8 K. W. Sigvardson and J. W. Birks, Anal. Chem., 1983, 55, 432.
9 N. Hanaoka, Anal. Chem., 1989, 61, 1298.
0 R. N. Jennings and A. C. Capomacchia, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1988,
2
05, 207.
2
1 H. Neuvonen, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2., 1994, 89.
Scheme 1
22 G. Orosz and E. Dudar, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1991, 247, 141.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2002, 1653–1657
1657