356
J.-Q. Yu, L. Zhao / Phytochemistry Letters 13 (2015) 355–359
silica gel (200–300 mesh). TLC was carried out with glass plate
precoated silica gel G. Spots were visualized under UV light and by
spraying with 10% H2SO4 in 95% EtOH, followed by heating at
100 8C. Acetonitrile and methanol used in preparative HPLC
procedure were in HPLC grade, and other solvents were of
analytical grade.
2.3.2. Methyl-O-
a
-
L
-cymaropyranosoyl-(1 ! 4)-
b
-D-
digitoxopyranoside (2)
White amorphous powder; ½a D20
ꢂ
-11.6 (c = 0.12, CH3OH, 20 8C);
IR (KBr) n ;
max: 3395, 2924, 2850, 1451, 1379, 1158, 1060, 992 cmꢁ1
ESI-MS (positive mode) m/z: 329.5 [M + Na]+; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
pyridine-d5): dH 5.41 (dd, J = 10.2, 1.8 Hz, H-10), 5.06 (br s, H-100),
4.46 (2H, overlapped, H-30, 50), 4.10 (m, H-500), 3.70 (m, H-300), 3.60
(m, H-400), 3.54 (s, OMe-10), 3.38 (s, OMe-300), 3.41 (m, H-40), 2.38
(m, Ha-20), 2.35 (m, Ha-200), 1.91 (m, Hb-20), 1.82 (m, Hb-200), 1.43 (d,
J = 6.6 Hz, H-60), 1.36 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, H-600); 13C NMR (125 MHz,
2.2. Plant material
The roots of C. stauntonii were collected from Hebei Province of
China. It was identified by associate Prof. L Ma from Institute of
Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking
Union Medical College. A voucher specimen (ID-S-2426) was
deposited in the Herbarium of Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese
Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China.
pyridine-d5): d
C 98.6 (C-10, d), 98.4 (C-100), 80.9 (C-40, d), 76.6 (C-300,
d), 72.8 (C-400, d), 69.2 (C-50, d), 67.9 (C-500, d), 67.2 (C-30, d), 57.5
(OMe-10, q), 56.8 (OMe-300, q), 38.6 (C-20, t), 32.3 (C-200, t), 18.6 (C-
600, q), 18.4 (C-60, q); HRESI-MS (positive mode) m/z:
329.4577 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C14H26O7Na, 329.4575).
2.3. Extraction and isolation
2.3.3. (+)-(7S, 8R, 7E0)-5-hydroxy-3, 50-dimrthoxy-40, 7-epoxy-8, 30-
neolign-70-ene-9, 90-diol 90-ethyl ether(3)
The dried-up and powdered roots of C. stauntonii (30 Kg) were
extracted three times under reflux with 95% EtOH (2 h, 1 h, 1 h).
The EtOH extract was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield a
dark-brown residue (5000 g). The residue was suspended in 80%
aqueous ethanol (10,000 mL) and then extracted with petroleum
ether, and EtOAc, respectively and successively, each for three
times in separatory funnel. The combined EtOAc solution was
washed with 5% aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (3 ꢀ 1000 mL) and
then H2O (2 ꢀ 1000 mL), respectively, to pH 7. After removal of the
organic solvent, 190 g of brown residue was obtained. This
resulting residue was fractionated by CC over silica gel eluted
with gradient solvents of CHCl3-MeOH (100:0 ! 1:1) to yield
13 fractions (designated as F1 to F13) based on their TLC analysis.
Fraction 3 (24.0 g) was applied to Flash C18 column chromatogra-
phy eluted with CH3OH/H2O (40% ! 100%) to give six subfractions
(F3-1 to F3-6). Fraction 3-4 (2.0 g) was applied to Flash C18 column
chromatography eluted with CH3OH/H2O (40% ! 100%) to give
five subfractions (F3-4-1 to F3-4-5). Fraction 3-4-5 (100 mg) was
applied to preparative HPLC system [mobile phase: CH3OH/H2O
(75:25, v/v); flow rate: 5 mL minꢁ1; UV detection at 210 nm]
resulting in the isolation of compound 2 (35 mg). Fraction 5
(12.0 g) was applied to Flash C18 column chromatography eluted
with CH3OH/H2O (40% ! 100%) to give five subfractions (F5-1 to
F5-5). Fraction 5-2 (2.5 g) was applied to Flash C18 column
chromatography eluted with CH3OH/H2O (40% ! 100%) to give
five subfractions (F5-2-1 to F5-2-5). Fraction 5-2-3 (400 mg) was
applied to preparative HPLC system [mobile phase: CH3CN/H2O
(45:55, v/v); flow rate: 5 mL minꢁ1; UV detection at 280 nm]
resulting in the isolation of compound 1 (80 mg). Fraction 6 (7.0 g)
was further separated by CC over silica gel using gradient solvents
of petroleum ether/acetone (25:1 ! 1:1) as eluents to yield four
further subfractions (F6-1 to F6-7). Fraction 6-3 (5.0 g) was applied
to Flash C18 column chromatography eluted with CH3OH/H2O
(40% ! 100%) to give five subfractions (F6-3-1 to F6-3-5). Fraction
6-3-3 (90 mg) was applied to preparative HPLC system [mobile
Brown jelly; ½a 2D0
ꢂ
+ 1.4 (c = 0.10, CH3OH, 20 8C); IR (KBr) nmax:
3285, 2939, 1646, 1534, 1447, 1400, 1239, 1076 cmꢁ1; ESI-MS
(positive mode) m/z: 409.1 [M + Na]+; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-
d6): 6.96 (br s, H-4), 6.95 (br s, H-20), 6.89 (br s, H-2), 6.75 (d,
J = 1.2 Hz, H-60), 6.74 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, H-6), 6.50 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-70),
6.19 (dt, J = 16.0, 6.0 Hz, H-80), 5.45 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, H-7), 4.03 (dd,
J = 6.0, 1.2 Hz, H-90), 3.78 (s, OMe-50), 3.73 (s, OMe-3), 3.70 (m, Hb-
9), 3.62 (m, Ha-9), 3.44 (dd, J = 14.0, 7.2 Hz, H-110), 3.43 (m, H-8),
1.13 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, H-120); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 147.5 (C-
3, s), 147.4 (C-40, s), 146.4 (C-5, s), 143.7 (C-50, s), 132.3 (C-1, s),
131.6 (C-70, d), 130.0 (C-10, s), 129.5 (C-30, s), 124.0 (C-80, d), 118.5
(C-6, d), 115.3 (C-4, d), 115.3 (C-60, d), 110.4 (C-20, d), 110.2 (C-2, d),
87.3 (C-7, d), 70.4 (C-90, t), 64.6 (C-110, t), 62.9 (C-9, t), 55.7 (OMe-3,
t), 55.6 (OMe-50, q), 53.0 (C-8, d), 15.2 (C-120, q); HRESI-MS
(positive mode) m/z: 409.1631 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C22H26O6Na,
409.1622).
2.4. Acid hydrolysis of 1 and 2 and determination of the absolute
configurations of the monosaccharides
Each solution of 6 mg of compounds 1 and 2 was refluxed
within 10% HCl (3 ml) at 75 8C for 2.5 h. After cooling, the reaction
mixture was extracted thoroughly with CHCl3, the CHCl3 layer was
washed with water, and then the water fraction was combined
with the original aqueous layer. The aqueous layer was evaporated
under vacuum, then re-diluted with water and re-evaporated in
vacuo repeatedly to eliminate the surplus HCl and furnish a final
neutral residue. The monosaccharides obtained on acid hydrolysis,
as described above, were dissolved in pyridine and reacted with L-
cysteine methyl ester hydrochloride at 60 8C for 1 h. Equal volume
of acetic anhydride was added and heating was carried out for
another 1 h. Acetylated thiazolidine derivatives were injected into
GC system. The absolute configurations of the sugars were
determined by comparing the retention times with those of
acetylated thiazolidine derivatives synthesized from the known
sugars obtained through acid hydrolysis of the known compound
phase: CH3CN/H2O (38:62, v/v); flow rate: 5 mL minꢁ1
; UV
detection at 210 nm] resulting in the isolation of compound 3
(12 mg).
Glaucogenin-C-3-O-
a
b
-
-
L
-cymaropyranosoyl- (1 ! 4)-
-canaropyranoside (Fu et al., 2007). Also,
-canarose, -digitoxose, and -cymarose
b-D-digitoxo-
pyranosoyl-(1 ! 4)-
D
the retention times of
D
D
L
2.3.1. Deoxyamplexicogenin A-3-O-yl-4-O-(4-O-
a
-
-
L
-
were determined by interactive comparison among the known
compound Glaucogenin-C-3-O-
- cymaropyranosoyl-(1 ! 4)-
-digitoxopyranosoyl-(1 ! 4)- -canaropyranoside. GC condi-
m;
detection, FID; carrier gas, N2; injection temperature, 250 8C,
detection temperature, 280 8C, column temperature, 150 8C
(0 min), 10 8C/min to 250 8C (20 min). Retention times of the
cymaropyranosoyl- - digitoxopyranosoyl)-
b
-
D
b
-D
a
b-D
-
L
b-
canaropyranoside(1)
D
White amorphous powder; ½a D20
ꢂ
+ 2.21 (c = 0.09, CH3OH, 20 8C);
tions in the test: column, HP-5, 30 m ꢀ 0.25 mm, 0.25
m
IR (KBr)
n
max: 3432, 2934, 1679, 1452, 1379, 1163, 1063, 870 cmꢁ1
;
ESI-MS (positive mode) m/z: 769.4 [M + Na]+; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
pyridine-d5) and 13C NMR (125 MHz, pyridine-d5) for aglycone and
sugar moiety, see Table 1; HRESI-MS (positive mode) m/z:
769.3775 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C40H58O13Na, 769.3770).
authentic samples: tR
D-digitoxose 13.09 min, tR L-cymarose
13.46 min, and tR -canarose 16.51 min).
D