A R T I C L E S
Lizandara-Pueyo et al.
ZnO can be prepared from the vapor phase using different
methods including chemical vapor deposition,15 or physical
methods like RF magnetron sputtering, molecular-beam epitaxy
or pulsed-laser deposition.3,16 Despite that the mentioned
methods furnish ZnO with very defined and interesting proper-
ties, their big disadvantage is regarding large-scale production.
Larger amounts at significantly less technical effort can be
provided using bottom-up techniques like precipitation/ crystal-
lization from the liquid phase including melts.17 The predomi-
nant precursor-type for zinc oxide are Zn2+ salts combined with
relatively primitive anions, mainly nitrate and acetate. The
lowering of the pH value leads to the transient formation of
zinc hydroxide which then transforms into ZnO by dehydration.
As a consequence most studies about the formation of ZnO from
solution have focused on water and other very polar solvents.18,19
Good precursors for the generation of ZnO in organic solvents
are organometallic zinc complexes. A nice study was published
by Chaudret et al.20 The authors were able to prepare mono-
disperse ZnO colloids from the controlled oxidation of dieth-
ylzinc (ZnEt2) dissolved in tetrahydrofurane (THF). However,
to the best of our knowledge there exists currently no mecha-
nistic report about the nucleation and growth of ZnO in organic
solvents. On the one hand, due to the excellent relevance of
zinc oxide it is also very important to acquire a detailed
knowledge about the formation of ZnO in nonaqueous systems.
On the other hand, the free excess surface energy γLTS between
the liquid and the forming solid plays a dominant role in all
equations describing nucleation and growth. γLTS is directly
influenced by the choice of the solvent. For instance, the free
enthalpy for nucleation ∆GN contains one surface and one
volume term:
volume term in eq 1 is only important at small particle sizes
due to its r2 dependence in comparison to the r3 dependence of
the volume term. Therefore, γLTS is very important during
nucleation and initial growth. γLTS can be varied if the nucleation
experiments are accomplished in diverse solvents.
We present here a mechanistic study on the nucleation and
growth of ZnO in organic, aprotic solvents. A special precursor
system is employed which allows to perform a fine-tuning of
nucleation and growth and, thus, permits to investigate the
ongoing processes by in situ methods.
Results and Discussion
Setting up the System. It was already mentioned that previous
studies on ZnO formation from homogeneous solution have been
performed on polar, protic solvents, most frequently on water.18,19
Zn2+-salts are of only limited use as far as apolar, aprotic
solvents are concerned because their limited solubility in such
media would not allow to reach a sufficiently high supersatu-
ration level. The bis-alkylzinc compounds utilized by Chaudret
et al. might be an alternative. However, the disadvantage of
ZnR2 is that they are difficult to handle due to the pronounced
reactivity.20 It would be very difficult to perform the nucleation
and growth experiments under controlled conditions using bis-
alkyzinc compounds as precursors for ZnO.
Our group introduced a different organometallic precursor
system to ZnO materials chemistry recently: Alkylzincalkoxides
with heterocubane architecture.7,11,12,23-25 A large variety of
the tetrameric compounds [RZnOR′]4 can be prepared from the
reaction of ZnR2 with the respective alcohol in high yield (see
experimental part). The molecular zinc-oxo heterocubanes
possess many advantages: They are highly soluble and stable
in most aprotic and dry organic solvents. Due to their organo-
metallic character they react to ZnO either by thermal reaction
or the reaction with water.12 It has to be stressed that in the
latter case water does not the play the role of a solvent, it is a
reactant. The reactivity of the [RZnOR′]4 compounds is much
lower than the reactivity of the pure bis-alkylzinc compounds
mentioned before, and it can be adjusted via the modification
of the organic rests attached to the heterocubane core. Last but
not least, the ‘Zn4O4′ heterocubane core can be regarded as a
preformed embryo for ZnO. The structure of [MeZnOisoPr]4 for
instance (determined from single-crystal analysis)25 is plotted
in Figure 1a in such a way that the central “Zn4O4” unit becomes
visible. Furthermore, the tetrahedral coordination of the Zn-
centers is highlighted which is also the coordination mode of
zinc in ZnO. However, some differences between the precursor
and ZnO-Wurtzite are also evident. The zinc-centered tetrahedra
are linked to each other via edges for the molecular precursor
and via angles in the Wurtzite crystal structure.
4
3
∆GN ) 4πr2γLTS + πr3∆Gbulk
(1)
with ∆Gbulk being the free enthalpy of the bulk:
-RT ln S
∆Gbulk
)
(2)
Vm
with Vm being the molar volume of the bulk crystal, and S being
the supersaturation.21,22 The so-called supersaturation S is the
quotient of the actual concentration and the concentration of
the respective species at equilibrium conditions. Therefore, S
indicates how far away from equilibrium the system is. The
(16) (a) Sun, X. W.; Kwok, H. S. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 86, 408. (b) Bagnall,
D. M.; Chen, Y. F.; Shen, M. Y.; Zhu, Z.; Goto, T.; Yao, T. J. Cryst.
Growth 1998, 185, 605. (c) Fujimura, N.; Nishihara, T.; Goto, S.;
Xu, J. F.; Ito, T. J. Cryst. Growth 1993, 130, 269.
(17) (a) Sekiguchi, T.; Miyashita, S.; Obara, K.; Shishido, T.; Sakagami,
N. J. Cryst. Growth 2000, 214, 72. (b) Reynolds, D. C.; Litton, C. W.;
Look, D. C.; Hoelscher, J. E.; Claflin, B.; Collins, T. C.; Nause, J.;
Nemeth, B. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 95, 4802. (c) Ohyama, M.; Kozuka,
H.; Yoko, T. Thin Solid Films 1997, 306, 78. (d) Meulenkamp, E. A.
J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 5566.
(21) Mullin, J. W. Crystallization, 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford,
1997.
(22) Park, J.; Soon, J. J.; Kwon, S. G.; Jang, Y.; Hyeon, T. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4630.
(18) (a) Wong, E. M.; Bonevich, J. E.; Searson, P. C. J. Phys. Chem. B
1998, 102, 7770. (b) Viswanatha, R.; Sapra, S.; Satpati, B.; Satyam,
P. V.; Dev, B. N.; Sarma, D. D. J. Mater. Chem. 2004, 14, 661.
(19) (a) Turgeman, R.; Tirosh, S.; Gedanken, A. Chem.-Eur. J. 2004, 10,
1845. (b) Uthirakumar, P.; Lee, Y. S.; Suh, E. K.; Hong, C. H. Phys.
Lett. A 2006, 359, 223. (c) Viswanatha, R.; Amenitsch, H.; Sarma,
D. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4470. (d) Viswanatha, R.; Santra,
P. K.; Dasgupta, C.; Sarma, D. D. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2007, 98.
(20) (a) Monge, M.; Kahn, M. L.; Maisonnat, A.; Chaudret, B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5321. (b) Kahn, M. L.; Monge, M.; Colliere,
V.; Senocq, F.; Maisonnat, A.; Chaudret, B. AdV. Funct. Mater 2005,
15, 458. (c) Kahn, M. L.; Monge, M.; Snoeck, E.; Maisonnat, A.;
Chaudret, B. Small 2005, 1, 221. (d) Kahn, M. L.; Cardinal, T.;
Bousquet, B.; Monge, M.; Jubera, V.; Chaudret, B. ChemPhysChem
2006, 7, 2392.
(23) (a) Polarz, S.; Orlov, A.; Schu¨th, F.; Lu, A. H. Chem.-Eur. J. 2007,
13, 592. (b) Orlov, A.; Roy, A.; Lehmann, M.; Driess, M.; Polarz, S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 371. (c) Polarz, S.; Roy, A.; Merz, M.;
Halm, S.; Schro¨der, D.; Scheider, L.; Bacher, G.; Kruis, F. E.; Driess,
M. Small 2005, 1, 540. (d) Polarz, S.; Orlov, A.; Van den Berg, M.;
Driess, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7892. (e) Roy, A.; Polarz,
S.; Rabe, S.; Rellinghaus, B.; Zahres, H.; Kruis, F. E.; Driess, M.
Chem.-Eur. J. 2004, 10, 1565.
(24) Van den Berg, M.; Polarz, S.; Tkachenko, O. P.; Klementiev, K. V.;
Bandyopadhyay, M.; Khodeir, L.; Gies, H.; Muhler, M.; Gru¨nert, W.
J. Catal. 2006, 241, 446.
(25) Ischenko, V.; Polarz, S.; Grote, D.; Stavarache, V.; Fink, K.; Driess,
M. AdV. Funct. Mater. 2005, 15, 1945.
9
16602 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 49, 2008