672
steroids 7 1 ( 2 0 0 6 ) 670–673
([M − H]−). Anal. calcd. for C18H24O3: C, 74.97; H, 8.39. Found:
5: UV (CH3OH): ꢀmax 247, 289 nm; 1H NMR [14]; ESI(+)MS m/z:
341 ([M + H]+, 100), 343 ([M + 2 + H]+, 63), 345 ([M + 4 + H]+, 15).
C, 75.00; H, 8.42.
2.3.
10ˇ-Chloro-17ˇ-hydroxyestra-1,4-dien-3-one (2),
4-chloro-10ˇ, 17ˇ-dihydroxyestra-1,4-dien-3-one (3),
2,10ˇ-dichloro-17ˇ-hydroxyestra-1,4-dien-3-one (4),
4,10ˇ-dichloro-17ˇ-hydroxyestra-1,4-dien-3-one (5)
3.
Results and discussion
Several oxidants, such as potassium permanganate, lead
tetraacetate, diacetoxyiodobenzene, sodium periodate, potas-
sium persulfate were tested for their ability to bring about
direct conversion of 17-estradiol to the quinol 1. Of these,
potassium permanganate proved to be the most efficient in
producing the desired quinol in good yield. The reaction was
investigated under different experimental conditions, and
an optimized procedure was eventually developed, using an
acidic water/ethyl acetate 1:1 as solvent and 2 molar equiv-
alents of the oxidant. By this method, complete substrate
consumption was observed in less than 1 min, and the desired
quinol 1 was obtained in 75% isolated yield in pure form in the
analysis and comparison with literature data; the stereochem-
istry of the C-10 centre was confirmed from the CD spectrum
[18] showing a negative Cotton effect similar to that reported
for 10-substituted compounds [14,18–20]. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first method for preparing 1 by direct
oxidation of 17-estradiol without functional group protection
and chromatographic separation.
10-Chloro-17-hydroxyestra-1,4-dien-3-one (2) was pre-
pared in 44% isolated yield (48% formation yield as determined
by HPLC) by treating 17-estradiol with 2 molar equivalents
of NaClO2. After 30 min, substrate consumption was com-
plete, and compound 2 was obtained by extraction of the mix-
ture with ethyl acetate, followed by chromatographic purifi-
observed.
17-Estradiol (100 mg, 0.37 mmol) in methanol (7 mL) was
added under vigorous stirring to 0.01 M aqueous HCl (20 mL)
containing NaClO2 (66 mg, 0.74 mmol). After 30 min reac-
tion time, when substrate consumption was complete (HPLC
evidence), the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate
(3 × 75 mL), the organic layers were collected, taken to dryness,
and the residue fractionated on silica plates to afford pure 2
(50 mg, 44% yield, Rf = 0.49, RT = 12.7 min) as colourless crystals
4 (7 mg, 6% yield, Rf = 0.55, RT = 19.3 min), 5 (12 mg, 9% yield,
Rf = 0.52, RT = 21.2 min).
2: m.p. 158–160 ◦C [14]; UV (CH3OH):
241, 280 (sh) nm;
max
1H and 13C NMR [14] (see Table 1); ESI(+)MS m/z: 307 ([M + H]+,
100), 309 ([M + 2 + H]+, 35). Anal. calcd. for C18H23O2Cl: C, 70.46;
H, 7.56. Found C, 70.89; H, 7.45.
3: UV (CH3OH): ꢀmax 249, 289 nm; 1H NMR (CDCl3), ı (ppm)
0.85 (3H, s), 1.03 (1H, m), 1.07 (2H, m), 1.09 (1H, m), 1.34 (1H,
m), 1.45 (1H, m), 1.50 (1H, m), 1.64 (1H, m), 1.65 (1H, m), 1.86
(1H, m), 2.00 (2H, m), 2.09 (1H, m), 2.60 (1H, m), 3.17 (1H, m),
3.64 (1H, m), 6.31 (1H, d, J = 10.4 Hz), 7.12 (1H, d, J = 10.4 Hz); 13
C
NMR (CDCl3), ı (ppm) 11.0 (CH3), 22.8 (CH2), 23.6 (CH2), 28.7
(CH2), 30.4 (CH2), 31.9 (CH2), 35.0 (CH), 36.1 (CH2), 43.0 (C), 49.7
(CH), 55.3 (CH), 72.8 (C), 81.5 (CH), 126.9 (CH), 127.0 (C), 150.6
(CH), 160.6 (C), 178.7 (C); ESI(−)MS m/z: 321 ([M − H]−, 100), 323
([M + 2−H]−, 35).
4: UV (CH3OH): ꢀmax 253, 288 (sh) nm; 1H NMR [14]; ESI(+)MS
m/z: 341 ([M + H]+, 100), 343 ([M + 2 + H]+, 63), 345 ([M + 4 + H]+,
12).
For both products 1 and 2 complete resonances assignment
(Table 1) was obtained by 2D (COSY, HMQC, HMBC, and ROESY)
NMR analysis. Coupling constants (Table 2) were obtained by
DQF-COSY experiments.
Table 1 – Selected NMR data for compounds 1–2a
Careful analysis of the reaction mixture of 17-estradiol
with NaClO2 revealed the presence of minor components
which were purified by preparative TLC and subjected to com-
plete spectral analysis. The most polar compound was char-
acterized as the novel 4-chloro-10, 17-dihydroxyestra-1,4-
dien-3-one (3). The CD spectrum supporting the assignment
of configuration at C-10 is shown in Fig. 1. The other two prod-
ucts were identified as 2,10-dichloro-17-hydroxyestra-1,4-
1
2
ıC
ıH
ıC
ıH
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
C-6
C-7
C-8
151.1
131.3
186.0
126.1
165.2
32.3
33.4
35.1
55.6
76.3
22.7
36.3
43.2
49.9
23.6
30.4
81.6
11.0
6.98
6.34
–
6.17
–
2.45 (), 2.33
1.95 (), 1.06
1.97
1.20
–
1.83 (), 1.68
1.99 (), 1.05
–
147.9
126.6
185.0
123.8
161.1
32.3
32.3
35.8
53.4
67.7
22.9
35.9
43.0
49.4
23.5
30.4
81.4
11.0
7.13
6.18
–
6.06
–
2.85 (), 2.41
1.96 (), 1.03
1.96
C-9
1.34
C-10
C-11
C-12
C-13
C-14
C-15
C-16
C-17
C-18
–
1.89 (), 1.80
1.91 (), 1.12
–
0.92
1.02
1.33 (),1.62
1.45 (), 2.04
3.65
1.38 (), 1.61
1.50 (), 2.09
3.65
0.83
0.85
a
Spectra were taken in CDCl3.
Fig. 1 – CD spectrum of compound 3 taken in methanol.